0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
100 vues2 pages
The document discusses a legal case involving the Development Bank of the Philippines exercising its right to rescind a deed of conditional sale due to the debtor's failure to pay six monthly amortizations. The bank gave due notice of a notarial rescission. The Civil Code allows parties to agree that a violation of contract terms can result in cancellation of the contract. Judicial intervention is only needed to determine if the rescission was proper. If rescission is deemed proper, the court's decision simply declares the revocation, but does not itself revoke the contract.
The document discusses a legal case involving the Development Bank of the Philippines exercising its right to rescind a deed of conditional sale due to the debtor's failure to pay six monthly amortizations. The bank gave due notice of a notarial rescission. The Civil Code allows parties to agree that a violation of contract terms can result in cancellation of the contract. Judicial intervention is only needed to determine if the rescission was proper. If rescission is deemed proper, the court's decision simply declares the revocation, but does not itself revoke the contract.
The document discusses a legal case involving the Development Bank of the Philippines exercising its right to rescind a deed of conditional sale due to the debtor's failure to pay six monthly amortizations. The bank gave due notice of a notarial rescission. The Civil Code allows parties to agree that a violation of contract terms can result in cancellation of the contract. Judicial intervention is only needed to determine if the rescission was proper. If rescission is deemed proper, the court's decision simply declares the revocation, but does not itself revoke the contract.
November 23, 2011 DOCTRINAL DIGEST A creditor, like Development Bank of the Philippines, in a deed of conditional sale, could exercise its right to rescind the contract due to the failure of the debtor to pay the six monthly amortizations, and after being given due notice of the notarial rescission. Article 1191 of the Civil Code did not prohibit the parties from entering into an agreement whereby a violation of the terms of the contract would result to its cancellation. Judicial intervention is only necessary to determine whether or not the rescission was proper. Where such propriety is sustained, the decision of the court will be merely declaratory of the revocation, but it is not itself the revocatory act.