Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Magdalena Byra
Paula Mendez
Luis Felipe Bermudez
Introduction
Thinking is slow, effortful, and unreliable.
It does not immediately solve problems and it takes concentration.
Also, it might provide wrong solutions to a problem.
Critical Thinking
CRITICAL THINKING
John Dewey
Socratic Circles
12
7
10 6
8 5
4
6
3
4
2
2
1
0 0
Finding Main Idea Higlighting Predicting Finding Main Idea Higlighting Predicting
Excellent Outstanding Good Not able Excellent Outstanding Good Not Able
Critical Thinking Skills
Critical Thinking Skills before Socratic Circles Critical Thinking Skills after Socratic Circles
10 12
9
10
8
7
8
6
5 6
4
4
3
2
2
1
0 0
Making Inferences Connecting Text to Self Making Inferences Connecting Text to Self
Excellent Outstanding Good Not Able Excellent Outstanding Good Not Able
Perception after the activity
General Perception of Socratic Circles after concluding the activity
9
0
Task was organized and understood the text better Task was relevant but no participation Task was disorganized
12
10
0
Improved Critical Thinking Didnt improve Critical Thinking Created confusion
Number of students
Aspects
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
9 12
8
10
7
6 8
5
6
4
3
4
2
1 2
0
Active Discussions Critical Thinking Understanding of the Cooperation 0
text Not enough time Discipline Organization o
Conclusions
Socratic circles can be applied to educational settings in a controlled and
efficient way
Socratic seminars can improve the quality of the students oral and written
productions taking into account that the teacher and the students are
prepared.
Students need to be empowered in order to participate in this activity.
References
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
Byrne, Ghiran Using Socratic Circles to Develop Critical Thinking Skills Practically Primary, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 2011.
Chorzempa, B. F., & Lapidus, L. (2009). To Find Yourself, Think for Yourself : Using Socratic Discussions in Inclusive Classrooms. TEACHING
Exceptional Children, 41(3), 5459.
Cohen , L, Manion , L & Morrison , K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.). New York : Routledge.
Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, Me.: Stenhouse.
Council of Europe, (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moeller, M., & Moeller, V. (2013). Socratic Seminars and Literature Circles. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Oyler, D. R., & Romanelli, F. (2014). The Fact of Ignorance Revisiting the Socratic Method as a Tool for Teaching Critical Thinking. American Journal of
Pharmaceutical Education, 78(7), 19.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). Critical thinking concepts and tools (5th ed.). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The thinker's guide to the art of Socratic questioning. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, R., & Elder, L., (2008, March). Critical thinking: The art of Socratic questioning, part III. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(3), 34-36.
Robinson, E. (2008). Evaluation of academic achievement at nine Paideia schools. Baylor University, Department of Educational Psychology.
https://www.paideia.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/08_baylor_report.pdf
Willingham, D. (2009). Why Dont Students Like School? San Francisco: Josey-Bass.