Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AML Investigations
Lets Refresh our Concept of Risk
Regulatory Fines/Penalty
Consultancy fees
Increased headcount
Identification
Evaluation and
Estimation of the levels of Risks
BFIU Circular Letter No. 01/2015 dated 08.01.2015 ML & TF Risk Assessment Guideline for Banking
Sector
Operational Risk
Legal Risk
Reputational Risk
Concentration Risk
Krolls Findings on Risk Assessment of IBBL
Risk rating is done on clients net-worth, occupation & transaction profile only
Customer Country/Jurisdiction
New customer
New customer but wants to conduct large any country which is unidentified by
transaction credible sources as having significant level
of corruption and criminal activity
Transaction to the same individual or group
any country subject to economic or trade
Cash intensive business sanctions
Identification is difficult to check any country known to be a tax haven and
Large but small denominated transactions unidentified by credible sources as
Distance between business and location of providing funding or support for terrorist
the customer activities or that have designated terrorist
organizations operating within their country
Non resident customer
any country unidentified by FATF or FATF
Complex corporate ownership
Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs) as not having
PEPs & IPs adequate AML&CFT system
Unreliable documents any country indentified as destination of
Inconsistent transaction with source of illicit financial flow
income etc.
Business Risks Arises to and from (Contd)
Regulatory Risks
Likelihood Scale
Frequency Likelihood of an ML/FT Risk
Very Likely Probably occur several times in a year
Likely High probability that it will happen once in a year
Unlikely Unlikely, but not impossible
Impact Scale
Consequence Impact of an ML/FT Risk
Major major damage or effect. Serious terrorist act or large-
scale money laundering
Moderate Moderate level of money laundering or terrorism
financing impact
Minor Minor or negligible consequences or effects
Risk Matrix
Risk Score Table
Methodology
Type & extent of interim validation
Result of the Risk Assessment
Material Change to the Risk Environment
Regulatory intervention
Trigger based
Implications
wgK cKwZ SuywKi gvv vi
26 dBU/wkwcs/KvMv GRU DP 3
27 wjwRs dvBbv Kvvbx gag 3
28 Byi/evKviR GRx gag 3
29 agxq cwZvb/msv gag 3
30 webv`bKvix cwZvb/cvK gag 3
31 gvUi cvUm Gi eemv gag 3
32 ZvgvK I wmMviUi eemv gag 3
33 Drcv`bKvix cwZvb gag 3
34 PvKzix (eZb wnmve evZxZ Ab wnmve) gag 3
35 Qv gag 3
36 MwnYx gag 3
37 AUv cvBgvix (bZzb Mvox) gag 2
38 `vKvbi gvwjK (LyPiv) wb 2
39 eemv-GRU wb 2
40 z` eemvqx (evwlK UvbIfvi 50 j UvKvi bxP) wb 2
41 evox wbgvY mvgMxi eemv wb 2
42 md&UIqvi eemv wb 2
43 PvKzix (aygv eZb wnmve) wb 1
44 PvKzix nZ AemiMnYKvix wb 1
45 KwlRxex wb 1
46 Abvb.....(aiY Abymvi evsK wi vi c`vb Kie)