0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
10 vues11 pages
Mr. Mendoza, a department manager, chose an equipment supplier that offered him a bribe over a more qualified supplier. The chosen equipment has since caused production delays from frequent breakdowns. An engineer, Mr. Castro, wonders if he should tell his superior about suspecting better equipment was available but not selected. If he reports this, an investigation may occur that finds documentation was falsified and bribes were accepted, resulting in Mr. Mendoza being fired and legal action taken.
Mr. Mendoza, a department manager, chose an equipment supplier that offered him a bribe over a more qualified supplier. The chosen equipment has since caused production delays from frequent breakdowns. An engineer, Mr. Castro, wonders if he should tell his superior about suspecting better equipment was available but not selected. If he reports this, an investigation may occur that finds documentation was falsified and bribes were accepted, resulting in Mr. Mendoza being fired and legal action taken.
Mr. Mendoza, a department manager, chose an equipment supplier that offered him a bribe over a more qualified supplier. The chosen equipment has since caused production delays from frequent breakdowns. An engineer, Mr. Castro, wonders if he should tell his superior about suspecting better equipment was available but not selected. If he reports this, an investigation may occur that finds documentation was falsified and bribes were accepted, resulting in Mr. Mendoza being fired and legal action taken.
Nadine T. Frisnedi Russell Jan P. Cortezano PROBLEM Mr. Mendoza is a department manager in XYZ Company that specializes in the production of semiconductor materials and electronic components. An equipment selection is going to happen and he is the one chosen to handle the project. He in charge of approving and accepting the bids of companies that will provide machines in the production of the electronic components. These contracts involve a huge amounts money since these machines are very expensive. Therefore it should be checked properly and inspected to be of the best standards and finest quality for the high production output rate. ANA Company offered the best quality equipment as per inspection but in a very expensive amount. CEA Company on the other hand provided equipment that are not of the best performance. XYZ has a very limited budget, so Mr. Mendoza is contemplating on which one to choose. The XYZ Company values the highest standards in every way at all times. However the budget allotted for buying new machines is not sufficient based from the given offer by the ANA Company it was not selected by Mr. Mendoza and chose the CEA Company to have the contract for the machines instead. His decision was also influenced by the promise given by Mr. De Leon, Engineer in Sales Representative in CEA Company, who offered Mr. Mendoza a brand new car so that he would hand the contract to his company. Mr. Mendoza accepted the offer because he taught that is was for the best. Later on Ms. Garcia a department head maintenance engineer heard of complaints that when the equipment was used in production, it did not meet the expected quality of output since some of the machines break down a lot and production is delayed. The technicians and engineers were having a hard time just to cope up with the delay in production. Mr. Castro, an engineer noticed that there is another brand of machine that is way better in performance and wonder why it was not selected. Should he tell his superior about it? GIVEN MR. MENDOZA - Department manager in XYZ Company - in charge of approving and accepting the bids of companies that will provide machines in the production of the electronic components ANA Company offered the best quality equipment CEA Company on the other hand provided equipment that are not of the best performance GIVEN MR. DE LEON -Engineer in Sales Representative in CEA Company MS. GARCIA - Department head maintenance engineer in XYZ Company MR. CASTRO - Engineer in XYZ Company under Ms. Garcia PROBLEM If Engr. Castro should or should not tell the authorities about the issues with the newly acquired machines. SOLUTION AND POSSIBLE OUTCOME Engr. Castro should approach his superior who is Engr. Garcia and tell her what he thinks of the newly acquired machines that are causing the delay of production. The possible outcome of this is that Engr. Garcia will then go and validate the information by consulting technicians or machine experts. If there is a probable cause, she will take the issue to her boss and an investigation might happen. Data can be checked to find proof that there might be a falsification of document in terms of the quality of performance of the machines bought from CEA Company and all the ones involved will the handling of contract will also be investigated and might lead to them finding out about Engr. Mendozas actions and as a consequence, he will be fired and sued for falsifying documents, and violating company policy of accepting bribes as well as making contracts that is of conflicting interest. As Mr. Mendoza gets fired, he would be replaced by new department manager. Thus, the unlawful acts done by Mr. Mendoza in the company that resulted in the problems among engineers and delay in production, could be prevented to happen again in the future.[4] IF MR. CASTRO DID NOT TELL HIS SUPERIOR Given that scenario, there is a possibility that the entire company may suffer greater loss and eventually, if the company does not meet its target output, they might be in a huge debt due to losses. Also, Mr. Mendoza will just keep on doing this type of practice since no one told the authorities about the machines and he wont be investigated, they might just give complaints on the machines bought from CEA Company.