FO/INS/COR

Penumpang yang terhormat,

sebentar lagi pesawat akan segera
lepas landas, harap handphone,
laptop, dan alat elektronik lainnya
dimatikan sekarang, karena akan
menggangung sistem navigasi
pesawat
"Please power off your electronic
devices like mobile phones, laptops
during takeoff and landing as they
may interfere with the airplane
system."
 Padahal, ujar Febri, dia tidak menegur Zakaria dengan kata-kata kasar
ketika meminta Zakaria mematikan ponselnya. Saya bilang dengan cara
sopan. Saya bilang, HP-nya saya pinjam dulu, Pak. Saya tidak tahu
kalau dia tersinggung, kata Febri yang tinggal di Perumahan Cimone
Permai, Ciputat, Tangerang itu.

Pukulan kedua dari Zakaria dilayangkan ke arah Febri ketika pesawat

telah mendarat di Bandara Depati Amir, Pangkalpinang, Bangka
Belitung. Akibatnya telinga Febri memar. Ketika itu Zakaria berkali-kali
berucap Penumpang adalah raja. Kepada orang-orang yang
menjemputnya di bandara, Zakaria juga mengatakan Biar kapok.
Name: Nur Febriyani
Age: 31 years
Occupation: Sriwijaya Flight
attendant
HP: +62813 xxxx xxxx
Address: Ciputat
Main HP/ Nelpon Di pesawat ! Gak pa pa dan gak bikin pesawat jatuh ! Hanya bikin
pramugari sewot doang ! Hanya bikin penumpang dipenjara
( farhat abbas capres ganteng)

This is the most crap I've ever heard (putting 9/11 official conspiracy aside). We
should openly rebel (while respecting flight crew). This is a federal regulation on
private companies. Just like the TSA, this = BULL. There has been "documented" 75
over worldwide airlines and with flights every day, that's less than 0.01%. These
"documented" experiences is also probably on the plane's end. This idiot ABC "News"
acts like there's NEVER failures in flight. Sorry to break it to you, you bunch of
ignorant mind controlling cowards, but flight failures happen EVERY DAY on almost
EVERY AIRCRAFT. Whether it be small things to big things. Do you know why the
plane doesn't crash? They have this unique ability to FLY. They GLIDE. They do not
drop out of the sky you bunch of idiots. Stop brainwashing the American people into
believing your idiocracy.

While they may not cause hardly any, and no lasting damage. There's a reason
you're asked to turn them off. They just might cause some interference, but the main
reason is that people are just rude! Can you imagine a coast to coast flight, where
everyone is trying to talk louder than his neighbor? It would be like holding a
screaming baby in your lap. For a good example, try riding a city bus. Five to Six
hours of that din on a flight would drive anyone postal!
 Theoretically, active radio transmitters such as mobile phones, small walkietalkies, or radio
remotecontrolled toys may interfere with the aircraft. This may be especially true for older planes
using sensitive instruments like older galvanometer based displays. However these have been
replaced by new technologies, which have good shielding
Another reason I found that makes the most sense was the fact that when you make a call, at say
10,000 feet, the signal bounces off multiple available cell towers, rather than one at a time. The
frequent switching between cells creates significant overhead on the network and may clog up the
networks on the ground, which is why the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) not the
Federal Aviation Association (FAA) banned cell use on planes.

The FCC did, however, allocate spectra in the 450- and 800-MHz frequency bands for use by
equipment designed and tested as "safe for air-to-ground service" and these systems use widely
separated ground stations. The 450-MHz service is limited to "general aviation" users, in corporate jets
mostly, while the 800-MHz spectrum can be used by airliners as well as for general aviation.
To conclude, the fact is that the radio frequencies that are assigned for aviation use are separate from
commercial use. In addition, the wiring and instruments for aircraft are shielded to protect them from
interference from commercial wireless devices.
Contrary to the fact, a few airlines do allow mobile phones to be used on aircraft, however with a
different system that utilises an on-board base station in the plane which communicates with
passengers' own handsets (see figure).
Some reasons for restricting mobile phone use on airplanes are:
1. Airlines need passengers under control and the best way to maintain that cattle-car atmosphere might just be with a set of little rules beginning
at takeoff.
2. The barrier is clearly political, not technological. No one in a position of authority wants to change a policy that is later implicated as a
contributing factor toward a crash. Therefore, it's a whole lot easier to do nothing and leave the policy as it is, in the name of "caution." (Since
old airplanes with analog systems may still be vulnerable to interference, it's best to make the rule consistent.)
3. The FCC (and not the FAA) bans the use of cell phones using the common 800-MHz frequency, as well as other wireless devices, because of
potential interference with the wireless network on the ground. This also clogs the ground network since the signal bounces off of multiple cell
towers.
4. Mobile phones do interfere with airplane communications and navigation networks trust what they tell you :).
5. Since the towers might be miles below the aircraft the phone might have to transmit at its maximum power to be received, thereby increasing
the risk of interference with electronic equipment on the aircraft. Similar to Point 4.
6. A few devices, if left on, may not cause any interference. However the case may be different if 50-100 or more devices are left on, chattering
away interfering with the plane communications system. Furthermore, there would be no way for the flight crew to easily determine which
devices are causing the problem. So best is to restrict usage completely.
7. If mobile phones are allowed on board, terrorists might use the signal from a cell phone to detonate an onboard bomb.
8. Airlines support the ban on mobile usage because they do not want passengers to have an alternative to the in-flight phone service. This
might have some truth to it since the phone service could be very profitable for the companies involved.
9. Even though all aircraft wiring is shielded, over time shielding can degrade or get damaged. Unshielded wires exposed to cell phone signals may
affect navigation equipment.
10.Another reason could be to keep passengers aware of the important announcements and safety procedures from pilot and crew, which
otherwise could be ignored. In addition, these devices in people's hands could cause injuries during an emergency situation and hence should be
required to be switched off during landing and take-off. The idea being that since one could not operate the device, most likely, passengers
would keep them away rather than holding them.
 No Exact Evidence of Phone cell effect to Plane Accident, Yet the rules
has Clearly Mention, Therefore instead of Arguing on Why it couldnt be
use, in the name of Percussion it will be better to Follow the Rule

National Rule Related to Radio Frequency Intervention

Restriction
1. UU No. 36 Tahun 1999 tentang Telekomunikasi, Pasal 33
Ayat (2) dan Pasal 38. Sanction: 4 years prison and/or
Rp. 400 million fine
2. UU RI no.1 Tahun 2009
3. instruksi Direktur Keselamatan Penerbangan Ditjen
Perhubungan Udara melalui suratnya No.
AU/4357/DKP.0975/2003
4. FAA 1991