Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 1 of 172
INTRODUCTION
Questions to be addressed in this chapter include:
How do organizations buy software, hardware, and
vendor services?
How do information systems departments develop
custom software?
How do end users develop, use and control
computer-based information systems?
Why do organizations outsource their information
systems, and what are the benefits and risks of doing
so?
How are prototypes used to develop an AIS, and what
are the advantages and disadvantages?
What is computer-aided software engineering, and
how is it used in systems development?
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 2 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 3 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 4 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 5 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 6 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 7 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 8 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 9 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Advantages of ASPs:
Reduction of software costs and administrative
overhead.
Automated software upgrades.
Scalability as the business grows.
Global access to information.
Access to skilled IT personnel.
Ability to focus on core financial competencies
rather than IT.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 10 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 11 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 12 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 13 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
These activities must still take place,
including:
Purchasing software
Selecting and personnel
and training the SDLC:
Companies Installing
that buy andrather
testingthan
hardware and software
develop
Documenting procedures
software still follow the SDLC process,
Converting from old to new AIS
including:
However, the software modules do not
Systems analysis
have to be developed and tested.
Conceptual
And design
the computer programs do not need
Physical
todesign
be documented.
Implementation and conversion
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 14 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Selecting a vendor
Deciding whether to make or buy software
can be made independently of the decision to
acquire hardware, service, maintenance, and
other AIS resources.
And the preceding resources can be bought
independently of the software.
But hardware and vendor decisions may
depend on the software decisions.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 16 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 17 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 18 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 19 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 20 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 21 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 22 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 23 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 24 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 25 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 26 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 27 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 28 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 29 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 30 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 31 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 32 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 33 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 34 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 35 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 36 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Benchmark problem
The new AIS performs a data processing task
with input, processing, and output jobs typical
of what would be required of the new system.
Processing times are calculated and
compared.
The AIS with the lowest time is judged most
efficient.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 37 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 38 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Point scoring:
A weight is assigned to each criterion used to
evaluate the system, based on the relative
importance of that criterion.
Each criterion is rated for each product.
Each rating is multiplied times the weight
assigned to the criterion to develop a
weighted score.
The weighted scores are added for each
product.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 39 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Example:
Zorba Co. is evaluating systems offered by three
different vendors: Able Co., Baker Co., and Cook Co.
Zorba has determined three criteria that they will use
to evaluate the different systems: cost, speed, and
vendor reliability.
They have provided the following weights to each
criteria, with vendor reliability being the most critical:
Vendor reliability9
Cost6
Speed4
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 40 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 41 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
WEIGHTED SCORES
Criteria Able Co. Baker Co. Cook Co.
Vendor reliability (9) 18 45 36
Cost (6) 30 18 24
Speed (4) 12 16 8
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 42 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
WEIGHTED SCORES
Criteria Able Co. Baker Co. Cook Co.
Vendor reliability (9) 18 45 36
Cost (6) 30 18 24
Speed (4) 12 16 8
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 43 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 44 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 45 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
Requirements costing:
Estimates cost of purchasing or developing
features that are not included in a particular
AIS.
The total AIS cost is calculated by adding the
acquisition cost to the purchasing and
development costs.
Total cost = cost of system with all required
features.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 46 of 172
PURCHASING PREWRITTEN SOFTWARE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 47 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 48 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 50 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 51 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 52 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 53 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 54 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 55 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 56 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 57 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 58 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 59 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 60 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 61 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 62 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 63 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 64 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 66 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 67 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 68 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 69 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 70 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 71 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 72 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 74 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 75 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 77 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 78 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
Increased costs
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 79 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 81 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 82 of 172
DEVELOPING SOFTWARE IN-HOUSE
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 83 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 84 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
In a client/server or a PC outsourcing
agreement the organization outsources:
A particular service (e.g., help desk services);
A segment of its business;
A particular function; or
PC support.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 86 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 87 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 88 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 89 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Allows companies to concentrate on their core
competencies.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 91 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Asset utilization
Companies can improve cash position and reduce
expenses by selling their computers to an
outsourcer.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 92 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Asset utilization
Access to greater experience and more
advanced technology
The cost and time to stay at the cutting edge of
technology is escalating rapidly.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 93 of 172
OUTSOURCE
OutsourcingTHE SYSTEM
can reduce IS costs by 15
30% because of economies of scale and
lower costs of outsourcers.
Benefits of outsourcing:
IBM outsources project management and
Provides aprogramming
business solution
to China where labor costs
are 1/3 of U.S. costs.
Asset utilization
Access to greater experience and more
advanced technology
Lower costs
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 94 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Asset utilization
Access to greater experience and more
advanced technology
Lower costs
Improved development time
Experienced specialists can often develop and
implement a system faster and more efficiently.
Can also help the company cut through some of
the internal politics.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 95 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Asset utilization
Access to greater experience and more
advanced technology
Companies with seasonal fluctuations dont have
Lower costs
to staff an IT force or maintain hardware for peak
Improvedperiods.
development time
Elimination of peaks-and-valleys usage
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 96 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Benefits of outsourcing:
Provides a business solution
Asset utilization
Access to greater experience and more
advanced technology
Lower costs
Companies
Improved development with in-house
time systems that downsize
are often left with an unnecessarily large AIS
Elimination of peaks-and-valleys usage
function.
Facilitation of downsizing
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 97 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing
Many outsourcing contracts fail to meet
expectations for reasons including:
Inflexibility
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 98 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss of control
The company may lose control of its system and data.
Also risk of confidential data being shared with others.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 99 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss of control
Reduced competitive advantage
Companies can lose a fundamental understanding of
their IS needs and how the system can provide it with
competitive advantages.
Outsourcers are not as motivated to meet the clients
competitive challenges.
Can be mitigated significantly by outsourcing the
portion of business processes considered standard
(e.g., payroll, accounts receivable) and customizing the
portion that provides competitive advantage.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 100 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss of control
Reduced competitive advantage
Locked in system
It is expensive and difficult to reverse outsourcing.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 101 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss of control
Reduced competitive advantage
Locked in system
Unfulfilled goals
Many outsourcing goals and benefits are never realized.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 102 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss
Some
of control
companies complain of poor service from
their outsourcers,
Reduced competitive particularly
advantagewith respect to:
Slow or no responsiveness to changing business
Lockedconditions.
in system
Poorly
Unfulfilled planned migration to new technologies.
goals
Poor service
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 103 of 172
OUTSOURCE THE SYSTEM
Risks of outsourcing:
Inflexibility
Loss of control
Increased
Reducedriskscompetitive advantage
include loss of market position,
loss of human
Locked capital, and reputation
in system
impairment among others.
Unfulfilled goals
Poor service
Increased risk
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 104 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 105 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 106 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
BPR:
Simplifies the system.
Makes it more effective.
Improves a companys quality and service.
BPR software has been developed to help
automate many BPR tasks.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 107 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 108 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 109 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 110 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
You centralize operations to achieve economies
of scale and eliminate redundancy.
Michael Hammer has set forth several principles
You decentralize operations to be more
that help organizations successfully reengineer
responsive to customers and provide better
business processes:
service
- Organize around outcomes,
With technology, not tasks.
you dont have to choose.
- Require those who use
Corporate-wide the output
databases to perform
centralize data. the
process.
Telecommunications technology disburses it to the
organization.
- Require those who produce information to process it.
- Centralize AND disperse data.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 111 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 112 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 115 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 116 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 117 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 118 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 119 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 120 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 121 of 172
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 122 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 123 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 124 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 125 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 127 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 128 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 130 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 131 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 132 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 134 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 135 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 136 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 137 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 138 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 139 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 140 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 141 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 142 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 143 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 144 of 172
PROTOTYPING
The users reactions to the new system are important
development considerations.
Many design strategies must be tested.
The design staff has little experience developing this type of
system or application.
The system will be used infrequently so that processing
efficiency is not crucial.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 145 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 146 of 172
PROTOTYPING
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 147 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Because of intensive end-user involvement.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 148 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Higher user involvement and satisfaction
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 149 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Higher user involvement and satisfaction
Faster development time
It may take days or weeks to get a prototype up vs. a
year or more for a traditional system.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 150 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Higher user involvement and satisfaction
Faster development time
Fewer errors
Errors are detected early because the users
experiment with each version.
Its also easy to identify and terminate an infeasible
AIS early.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 151 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Higher user involvement and satisfaction
Faster development time
Fewer errors
More opportunity for changes
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 152 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Advantages of prototyping:
Better definition of user needs
Higher user involvement and satisfaction
Faster development time
Fewer errors
More opportunity for changes
Less costly
Some for 1020% of the cost of traditional systems.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 153 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 154 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
Less efficient use of system resources
Shortcuts in developing the system may
result in:
Poor performance and reliability
High maintenance and support costs
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 155 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
Less efficient use of system resources
Incomplete system development
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 156 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
Less efficient use of system resources
Incomplete system development
Inadequately tested and documented
systems Who wants to do that stuff?
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 157 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
Less efficient use of system resources
Incomplete system development
Inadequately tested and documented systems
Negative behavioral reactions
If the prototype is discarded, users may be upset
about using it and losing it.
May also be dissatisfied if all their suggestions are
not incorporated or if they have to go through too
many iterations.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 158 of 172
PROTOTYPING
Disadvantages of prototyping:
Significant user time
Less efficient use of system resources
Incomplete system development
Inadequately tested and documented systems
Negative behavioral reactions
Never-ending development
If not managed properly, the development could get
stuck in a terminal loop.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 159 of 172
INTRODUCTION
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 160 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Traditionally, software developers have created
software to simplify the work of others, but not
for themselves.
Computer-aided software (or systems)
engineering (CASE) tools are an integrated
package of computer-based tools that automate
important aspects of the software development
process.
Used to plan, analyze, design, program, and maintain
an information system.
Also used to enhance efforts of managers, users, and
programmers in understanding information needs.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 161 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
CASE tools do not replace skilled
designers, but provide developers with
effective support for all SDLC phases.
CASE software typically includes tools for:
Strategic planning
Project and system management
Database design
Screen and report layout
Automatic code generation
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 162 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Advantages of CASE technology:
Increased productivity
Can generate bug-free code from system
specifications.
Can automate repetitive tasks.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 163 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Advantages of CASE technology:
Increased productivity
Improved program quality
Can simplify enforcement of structured
development standards, which:
Improves quality of development.
Reduces threat of serious design errors.
Can check internal accuracy of design
and detect inconsistencies.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 164 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Advantages of CASE technology:
Increased productivity
Improved program quality
Cost savings
Cost savings of up to 8090% are possible.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 165 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Advantages of CASE technology:
Increased productivity
Improved program quality
Cost savings
Improved control procedures
Encourages development early in the
design process of:
System controls
Security measures
System auditability
Error handling procedures
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 166 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Advantages of CASE technology:
Increased productivity
Improved program quality
Cost savings
Improved control procedures
Simplified documentation
Automatically documents as the system
development progresses.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 167 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Problems with CASE technology:
Incompatibility
Some tools dont interact effectively with
some systems.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 168 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Problems with CASE technology:
Incompatibility
Cost Some packages > $360,000.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 169 of 172
Computer-Aided Software Engineering
(CASE) Tools
Problems with CASE technology:
Incompatibility
Cost
Unmet expectations
Only 37% of CIOs believe they achieved expected
benefits.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 170 of 172
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Youve learned:
How organizations buy software, hardware,
and vendor services.
How information systems departments
develop custom software.
How end users develop, use, and control
computer-based information systems.
Why organizations outsource their information
systems, as well as the benefits and risks of
doing so.
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 171 of 172
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Accounting Information Systems, 11/e Romney/Steinbart 172 of 172