Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Agricultural Income is defined under Section 2(1A) of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
Power to levy taxes on agricultural income is vested only with the State
legislatures.
{a} Rent or revenue derived from land: The grant of use of land as a right for
which payment is made to the owner in cash or kind. The source of yielding
income has to be direct and proximate, not indirect.
In CIT v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy, the Court defined agricultural
purposes to include the following operations, which must be in
conjugation and continuation:
[i] Basic operations: activities essential to constitute agriculture prior to
germination, involving expenditure of human skill and labour on the land
itself e.g. tilling of land, sowing seeds and planting.
[ii] Subsequent Operations: activities performed after the production of
sprouts from the land which by themselves alwould not constitute
agriculture e.g. weeding, tending, pruning, cutting, felling.
CASE: Bacha F Guzdar v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Agricultural income as defined in Section 2(1A)(a) of the Indian Income tax
Act signifies income proximately derived from direct association with land by a
person who actually tills the land or gets it cultivated by others. Agricultural
income does not mean income which can be ultimately or indirectly traced to
have connection with agricultural operations.
Held: Dividend of a shareholder of the tea company would not be the part of
agricultural income.
[II] Section 2(1A) (b) of the Act
Agricultural income is the income derived from any land by agricultural
processing of the production, raised or received as rent in kind, in order to
make it fit for the market, or sale of such produce.
Three sub-sections:
(i) Agriculture: standing crop after harvest sold by agriculturist, or use for his
own consumption, or crop used as raw material for business.
(ii) Performing marketing process or agricultural process: Includes
increase in the value of produce for saleability (marketing process). Does
not include industrial processes (PGBP income) e.g. extraction of oil,
conversion of sugarcane into jaggery.
I. The owner of building should be the land-holder and the building should be occupied by him.
II. Where there is a cultivator or land holder receiving rent in kind, the only necessity is that the
building is occupied by him and ownership is not necessary.
III. Building should be within the vicinity of the land that is used for agricultural purposes.
IV. Building should be in the use as dwelling house, store house or other out-building.
V. Land should be assessed to land revenue or a local rate. If it is not assessed, then it
should be situated outside the urban area.
CONDITIONS
In the following circumstances income can be considered as agricultural income:
Existence of an area/land.
Both rent and income from the horticultural area and pay earned by the cultivator
or recipient by method for offer of produce are exempted from taxation only if
agricultural operations are performed on the land/area.
Cultivation of Land.
Article 246 (1) read with Article 270 of the Constitution gives the Centre authority
to legislate with regard to taxes on income other than agricultural income and the
States to legislate with regard to taxes on agricultural income.
In Karimtharuvi Tea Estates Ltd. v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court upheld such
power and freedom vested in the State Legislatures.
RELEVANCE IN INCOME TAX CALCULATION
Scheme of partially integrated taxation on non- agricultural income with income derived
from agriculture was:
Purpose: agricultural income of a person should be taken into account for the
purpose of determining the rates of income-tax chargeable to his non- agricultural
income.
COMPUTATION OF NET AGRICULTURAL INCOME
The net agricultural income thus computed is aggregated with the total
COMPUTING THE TAX BASED ON PARTIAL INTEGRATION
Agricultural income alone is not taxable.
But when assessee earns both non-agricultural income and agricultural income, then
the latter is included in total income for purposes of income tax computation
(indirectly taxing agricultural income).
Step 2: Add agricultural income to the maximum exemption limit available in the
case of assessee and compute tax on such amount as if it is the total income. [B]
Step 3: Deduct the amount of income tax as computed in Step 2 from the tax
computed in Step 1. The amount so arrived shall be total income- tax payable by
the assessee. [A - B]
Sale of cocoons- The silk cocoon cannot be regarded as the agricultural produce of the cultivator of mulberry
leaves and hence the income derived from the sale of cocoons is not agricultural income. [Lakshmanan & Co
(K) v. CIT]
Sale of water- Income from sale of water situated in a pond amidst agricultural land cannot be treated as
agricultural income. It is also otherwise not exempt as a capital receipt.
CASES WHERE INCOME WAS INFERRED AS AGRICULTURAL
Income from nurseries or pot cultivation- Income from sale of plant grown directly in the pots and the sale of
seeds will be agricultural income. Income from nurseries was not treated as agricultural income.
Miscellaneous income from plantation- Miscellaneous income should also be agricultural income except in
respect of sale of trees of spontaneous growth.
Proceeds of crop insurance- The compensation received for loss of agricultural produce in pursuance of an
insurance policy can be treated as agricultural income liable to tax. [Midland Rubber and Produce Company
Ltd. v. State of Kerala]
Sale of seeds procured by research- Sale of hybrid/ germ plasm seeds after heavy outlay on research
produced by unconventional methods would not constitute agricultural income.
Hybrid seeds- Production and sale of hybrid seeds was eligible for exemption on its entire income as
SHOULD AGRICULTURAL INCOME BE TAXED?
Majority of Indias population (70%) is dependent on agriculture as their means of earning.
Reasons for exempting agricultural income from income tax were:
(a) India was a poor, developing country.
(b) primary agricultural sector was in a bad shape.
(c) A lot of farmers were leaving the sector.
(d) Farmers committing suicide for heavy debts due to crop failures owing to unreliable
weather and low prices offered by traders and middlemen.
The intention of the government was thus, to not add to the plight of the poor farmers by
levying taxes on them.
Fact is, many farmers in the northern states are very rich.
Being a developing country India incurs a large amount of expenditure on the development of
infrastructure which is met by the taxpayers money. Exempting 70% of the population is a
huge loss.
Being exempted of tax,there are recurring cases of tax evasion.
According to statics agricultural income is around 2000 lakhs Crores, i.e. 20
times of the nations GDP.
Tax evaders represent their black money as agricultural income.
Taxation Enquiry Commission set up in 1953-54 recommended that the
agricultural income should be (directly) taxed.
Levying of income tax will not affect the poor farmers because income less
than Rs. 2,50,000 is exempted from income tax anyway.
For the initial years of taxing agricultural income, such revenue should be put
to expenditure on the development of equipment, machinery, policies of the
agricultural sector.
Both the farmers and the government will be at a win-win situation.
Thank You.