Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CONDENSERS
Liquid film
Condensate film thickness are thin heat transfer coefficients are large
Example - steam at a saturation temperature of 305 K condenses on a 2 cm O.D
tube with a wall temperature of 300 K
Average film thickness - 50m (0.05 mm) and the average heat transfer coefficient
11,700 W/m2.K
If the condensate flow rate is small, the surface of the film will be smooth and the
flow laminar because
Temperature difference is small
Wall is short
If the condensate flow rate is high, waves will form on the surface to give wavy
laminar flow
If the condensate flow rate is yet higher, the flow becomes turbulent
DROPWISE CONDENSATION
80C
Droplets
If the condensate does not wet the wall, because either it is dirty or it has been
treated with a non-wetting agent, droplets of condensate nucleate at small pits and
other imperfections on the surface, and they grow rapidly by direct vapor
condensation upon them and by coalescence
When the droplets become sufficiently large, they flow down the surface under the
action of gravity and expose bare metal in their tracks, where further droplet
nucleation is initiated
THIS IS CALLED DROPWISE CONDENSATION
Droplets slide down when they reach a certain size, clearing the surface and
exposing it to vapor.
There is no liquid film in this case to resist heat transfer.
Heat transfer rates that are more than 10 times larger than those associated with
film condensation can be achieved with dropwise condensation
Most of the heat transfer is through drops of less than 100m diameter
Thermal resistance of such drops is small; hence, heat transfer coefficients for
dropwise condensation are large; values of upto 30000 W/m2.K have been
measured.
Hence, dropwise condensation is preferred over filmwise condensation
Considerable efforts are put for non-wetting heat exchanger surfaces
If the surface is treated with non-wetting agent (stearic acid) to promote dropwise
condensation, the effect lasts only few days, until the promoter is washed off or
oxidised.
Continuous adding of the promoter to the vapour is expensive and contaminates the
condensate.
Bonding a polymer such as teflon to the surface is expensive and adds additional
thermal resistance
Gold plating is also expensive
Because of lack of sustainability of dropwise condensation, present day condensers
are designed based on filmwise condensation
Filmwise condensation conservative estimate
LAMINAR FLOW CONDENSATION ON A VERTICAL WALL
Tsat g
Tw
Laminar
Vapor reservoir
Cold wall Wavy T
Tw x
T x
0
Tsat
Velocity Vapor
Turbulent Liquid Vapor Liquid
Tw
Laminar film of
condensate x
0
T
Tsat
u
Zero shear , 0
v y
u
Tw
v
x = (y)
Interface
T = Tsat
Tsat
Tw x
y H
y + dy From reservoir of
hg d
saturated vapor
d
T Tsat
H + dH
ASSUMPTIONS
Laminar flow and constant properties are assumed for the liquid film
Gas is assumed to be pure vapour and at a uniform temperature equal to Tsat. The
merit of this simplification is that it allows us to focus exclusively on the
flow of the liquid film and to neglect the movement of the nearest layers of
vapour
Shear stress at the liquid-vapour interface is assumed to be negligible
With no temperature gradient in the vapour, heat transfer to the liquid-vapour
interface can occur only by condensation at the interface and not by
conduction from the vapour
Steady state two dimensional incompressible flow
u u P 2u 2u
L u v L 2 2
x y x x y
v v P 2v 2v
L u v L 2 2 L g
x y y x y
x ~ ;y ~ L
u v , Hence , x momentum equation vanishes
Neglected, y<<x
v v dP v v
2 2
L u v L 2 2 L g
x y dy x y
dP
pressure imposed from the inviscid potion v g Hydrostatic pressure
dy
v v 2v
L u v L v g L 2
x y x
v v 2v
L u v
L v g L 2
x y x
SINKING EFFECT
FRICTION
INERTIA
x 0 v 0 C2 0
v v
x 0 L g L v x C1 g L v C1
x x
x2
L v g L v C1 x C 2
2
C2 0
C1 g L v
x2
Lv g L v g L v x
2
g L v x2
v x
L 2
g L v 2 x 1 x
2
v x , y
L 2
Film thickness is unknown function of (y)
Local mass flow rate per unit width (y)
y
y L v dx
0
g L v
2
y L 2 x 1 x
2
dx
0 L
g L v 2 x 2 1 x 3
y L 3
L 2 6 0
L g L v 2
y
L 2 6
L g L v 2
y
L 3
L g L v 3
y
L 3
L g L v 3
y
L 3
b L g L v 3
b y
m
L 3
B width of the plate perpendicular to the plane of paper
Flow rate is proportional to the sinking effect - g(L-v)
Flow rate is inversely proportional to the liquid viscosity (Friction)
T Tsat Tw Tw
x
This is a linear temperature profile similar to the conduction in a plane
wall
Heat flux into the wall = Heat flux across the film
Q kl Tsat Tw
hTsat Tw
dT
kl
dx w A
kl
dT kl Tsat Tw
h
dx w
kl
Tsat Tw Tsat Tw
kl
h
Determination of film thickness
L g L v b L g L v 3
b y
3
y ; m
L 3
L 3
b L g L v 3 2 d Rate of condensation of
b y
dm
dy L 3 dy vapour over a vertical
distance dy
Rate of heat transfer from the vapour = Heat releasead as vapour is condensed
to the plate through the liquid film
Tsat Tw
dQ dmh fg k l b dy
dm k l b Tsat Tw
dy h fg
b L g L v 3 2 d kl b Tsat Tw
b y
dm
dy L 3 dy h fg
L g L v 3 2 d k T Tw
l sat
L 3 dy h fg
L k l Tsat Tw
3 d dy
L g L v h fg
4 L k l Tsat Tw
yC y 0, 0C 0
4 L g L v h fg
4 L kl Tsat Tw
y
4 L g L v h fg
1
4 k 4 T T 4
y L l sat w
y
L g L v h fg
1
g L v h fg k l4 4
h
kl L
4 L kl Tsat Tw y
1 1
L g
L L v h fg kl3 4
g L L v h fg k l3 4 L 1
dy
1 1
hL
L 0 4 L Tsat Tw y 4 L Tsat Tw L
y 4 dy
0
1
g L L v h fg k l3 4
hL 0.943
4 T T L
L sat w
1
b L g L v 3 4 k 4 T T 4
b y y L l sat w
y
L g L v h fg
m
L 3
3
b L g L v 4 L k l4 Tsat Tw 4
m y
3 L L g L v h fg
All liquid properties evaluated at
Tsat Tw
Tf
2
Effect of subcooling
Rohsenow refined
avoided linear temperature profile
Integral analysis of temperature distribution across the film
Temperature profile whose curvature increases with the degree of subcooling
Cp,L(Tsat-Tw)
C p ,L Tsat Tw
Ja
h fg
hfg h fg 1 0.68Ja
Reynolds Number
Lum Dh 4 Ac 4b
Re ; um ; Dh 4
L L P b
4 4
Re L
L L L
4
Re
L
L g L v 3
y
L 3
4 4 L g L v 3
Re
L 3 L L
4 L2 g 3 4 g 3
L v Re
3 L2 3 L2
4 L2 g 3
L v Re
3 L2
x L l
kl k
h hx L
3
hx L havg
4
3
2
kL
3
4 g L k L
2
4 g L
Re 2
3 L hx L 3 L
2
3
havg
4
1
1
g 3
havg 1.47k l Re 3
2
l
Hydraulic diameter
P 2L
P D Ac 2 L
PL
Ac D 4 Ac
Ac L Dh 4
4 Ac P
4 Ac Dh 4
Dh 4 P
P
Wavy Laminar flow over vertical plates
At Reynolds number greater than about 30, it is observed that waves form at the
liquid vapour interface although the flow in liquid film remains laminar. The flow in
this case is Wavy Laminar
Kutateladze (1963) recommended the following relation for wavy laminar
condensation over vertical plates
1
g
Re k l 3
hvert ,wavy
1.08 Re 1.22 2
5 .2 l
30 Re 1800 , v l
0.82
1
3.70Lk l Tsat Tw g 3
Revert ,wavy 4.81
l h fg
l
2
Turbulent flow over vertical plates (Re > 1800)
Labuntsov proposed the following relation
1
Re k l g 3
hvert ,turbulent
8750 58 Pr 0.5 Re 0.75 253 l2
Film condensation on an inclined Plates
1 1
1 2
hL l2 3
k l g
Re L 0.44
5.82 10 6 Re L
0.88
PrL3
Non-dimensionalised heat transfer coefficients for the wave-free laminar and
turbulent flow of condensate on vertical plates
Pr = 10
2
h( vl2 g )1 3
kl
1
3
l 0.315 10 Pa .s hfg 2257 103 0.68 4206 100 80
l l 0.326 10 6 m 2 / s
l hfg 2314103 J / kg
C pl 4206 J / kg .K
k l 0.675 W / m .K
Pr 1.9628
1 1
9.81 965.3 965.3
g L L v h fg k l3 4
2314 1000 0.6753 4
hL 0.943 0.943
4 T T L 4 0.315 103
100 804
L sat w
W
hL 2656.2
m2K
4 4 m 4 0.1329
Re 562.5
L
L b 0.315 10 3
3
1 1
1 2
hL l2 3
k l g
Re L 0.44
5.82 10 6 Re L
0.88
PrL3
1 1
hL 0.326 10
6 2 3
562.5 0.44
1 2
5.82 10 6 562.50.88 1.96283
0.675 9.81
W
hL 7691.4
m2K
4 4 m 4 0.9972
Re 3 4221
L L b 0.315 10 3