Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FACULTY OF LAW
UNIVERISTY TECHNOLOGY MARA
SOMETIMES REFERRED
TO AS THE RATIONALE
OF THE STUDY
SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
IS A SECTION WHICH
EXPLAINS WHY IT IS
IMPORTANT TO DO THE
RESEARCH.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS SECTION
THIS SECTION IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE
AT THIS POINT THE RESEARCHER
TRIES TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: IS
THIS RESEARCH WORTH DOING?
IN THIS SECTION, THE RESEARCHER
CAN CONVINCE THE COMMITTEE THAT
THE RESEARCH IS IMPORTANT AND
WORTHWHILE.
HOW TO PROVE IMPORTANCE OF THE
RESEARCH ?
IN THIS SECTION, IDENTIFY THE GROUP THAT
COULD BENEFIT FROM THE FINDINGS OF
YOUR STUDY.
WHOM THE GROUP MAY INVOLVE
IT MAY INVOLVE:
OTHER RESEARCHERS (resolves theoratical
questions/inconsistencies, develop a theoratical
model or gives idea for new research);
PROFESSIONALS AND OTHER PRACTITIONERS
(may change the way they execute their tasks or
provide better idea pertaining to their tasks);
Service Providers (may change the way they deal
with their clients);
Cont on group benefiting
Teachers/Lecturers/Trainers (may change the content
or method of teaching or understanding of anything
relevant to their teaching);
Policy Makers (may influence public policy and bring
about changes in the policies for the betterment of
society and country)
Managers (May change their management practices)
Consumers (may benefit from consumers rights
perspective or some of the above).
REMEMBER!
IT IS UNLIKELY THAT A STUDY
WOULD NOT BENEFIT ANYBODY.
HENCE, IDENTIFY THE BENEFIT
OF YOUR STUDY AND ELABORATE
IT IN YOUR SIGNIFICANCE OF
RESEARCH PORTION.
EXAMPLE OF SIGNIFICANCE OF RESEARCH
The findings of this study will provide salient evidence on the practice and
decision-making process of withholding/withdrawal of medical treatment
from the severely ill or impaired neonates in Malaysia. This will enable all
the stakeholders(politicians, legislators, medical practitioners, hospitals,
parents and educators) to better evaluate the effectiveness of the practice
and procedure used in deciding non-selective treatment for the said
neonates within the hospital settings in Malaysia.
The finding may also contribute to the development of improved
decision-making regime which is more transparent and systematic to
protect the rights of the affected neonates who are still vulnerable.
Finally, it is hoped that this study would encourage further related
research to identify reformations necessary in future to enhance the
decision-making regime within the hospital settings in Malaysia.
SCOPE (OR DELIMITATIONS) OF THE STUDY
THE END