Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The authorial voice is particularly severe here filtered through the voice of
Elinot who receives his slight as a violent confirmation of his social standing
and economic power. The language reflects this disapproval and desire to to
take revenge if only in language.
Some typical examples of the style in
Austen and its function
P. 21: Her eagerness..
P. 21: Dear, dear Morland
P. 25: They were scarcely ever without
P.27: Mariannes performance
P. 27 His pleasure in music.. (free indirect speech)
P. 33 His person
P. 37 You will soon have..
P. 97 Lucy was naturally clever
P. 197 Yes, but I did not love only him
P. 272 When Elinor had ceased to rejoice
P.275 But Elinor How are her feelings to be described?...
Speaking true or the good use of
language: some questions
reason and constraint
logic and the rejection of excess
language and politics
what links between good use of language and
property?
what is the link between propriety and irony?
Language and reason
Preamble:
Language as the motor of society: it can bind it together or
potentially explode it apart. Language as volatile,
dangerous and needing to be used with care. Irony as the
policing function of language - to avoid excess in language.
Reason as the guiding rule of the enlightenment. Logic and
reason which keeps in check the irrational forces of human
nature . It works against excessive sensibility or sentiment
Language is shown to be ideally guided by reason in Sense
and sensibility. Good sense is reason and language must
reflect this sense. Austen suggests however that sensibility
and sense must work together to keep society functioning
as it should.
Language is what polices the body puts trauma or desire
into words. Legal language places seduction on an
acceptable social footing (Mariannes engagement not
publicly said etc).
Flowery language as a disguise of real motivations (Lucy,
Willoughby, seducers of Eliza.
Language and silence: lack of reason/lack of ideas can
create silence (Lady Middleton). Or great intelligence be
silent (Bradon says little). The more reasonable Marianne
becomes the less she says.
Edward keeps his WORD a reasoned promise cannot be
revoked. He sparing language but the words he uses are
true
The Palmers: language without reason (Mrs. Palmer) vs
reason with little language (Mr. Palmer)
Fanny Dashwood reasons husband out of generosity. Fanny
always uses the language of reason to combat any warmth
or generosity
Problmatique
I wish to discuss Austens need to reveal plain
economic and social truths and the way she
does this through reason and sense. I will also
show that there is a tension between this
language of reason and a more anarchic force of
language which expresses desire and
undermines the status quo.
Plan
1. The language of reason: reasonable characters and their
reasonable narrator defending society and its truths. A style
which expresses reason.
2. Language is prompted by desire rather than pure reason. Pure
reason will create none of the dynamic movement that society
needs: who or what allows language to operate change in Sense
and Sensibility? Less reasonable characters use language which
questions the status quo (emotional or excessive language but
also irony). Is there a gender or class question here? What is the
point of speaking out against the grain?
3. Austen admires reason but her novels are not philosophical
tracts. They function on a co-existence of the wildness or
untamed nature of what is said and the restraints the
establishment places on it. The narrator operates a language of
control. Austen uses her language reasonably to make her novels
attractive and give readers a reason to read on: romantic
excitement and uncertainty is one of those reasons