Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
&
A New Approach
to
Rural Trauma Care
***
Military Trauma Care as the model
Norman McSwain MD
FACS, NREMT-P
Professor
Tulane School of Medicine
Trauma director
Charity Hospital
Thanks
for including me
in the summit
Interactive lecture
with yourself
How can I change
my state?
rt
– Knowledge, Skill , Ability, & Affect of the operator
– Resources available A
Goals of Prehospital care
• Improve survival
– Arrival on the scene
– Arrival at the hospital
– At worst “do no further harm”
• Reduce pain
– Stabilization
– Medication
• Reduce hemorrhage
– Stop on the scene
– Prevent additional hemorrhage
– Stabilize Fractures
– Deliver to correct hospital
Principles
• Do no further harm
• Preserve and improve energy production
• Airway/Ventilation management
• Hemorrhage control
• Transport patient to correct hospital
• Do not transport dead patients
• Appropriate resuscitation
• Reduce pain
Proof based patient care
Evidence based medicine
Prominence based patient care
Eminence based medicine
Perceptive based patient care
• WWI
– Thomas Splint
– Ground evacuation
• WWII
– Training of corpsmen in early management of injured soldiers
– Plasma
• Korea
– Use of helicopter for rapid transportation
– Front line hospitals (MASH)
Changes of the Wars
• Viet Nam – advanced scene care by corpsmen
– IV
– Airway
– Bypass CAS for MASH
– Large volumes of crystalloid resuscitation
• Iraq/Afgahnistan
– Advanced care en route to the next medical care
– Damage control Surgery
– Damage control Resuscitation
– Military Echelon of Casualty Management
– Tourniquets/hemostatic agents
– Interosseous vascular access
Larrey’s Principles
EMS Changes in Current Conflicts
• CoTCCC
• TCCC
• Military Echelon Casualty Management (MECM)
• Medical Evacuation (CCAT)
• Hemorrhage control
– Tourniquets
– Hemostatic agents
• Resuscitation
• Surgical management
• Interosseous Access
• Field Assessment
• Field trauma management
Committee on
(CoTCCC)
CoTCCC Members –
Recent and Present
• U.S. Surgeon General
• Chairman – ACS Committee on Trauma
• Trauma consultants for Army, Navy, and Air Force
Surgeons General
• 5 Trauma Directors for Level 1 Trauma Centers
• White House Medical Officer
• 2 Command Surgeons, U.S. Special Operations
Command (USSOCOM)
• Command Surgeon for the Army Rangers
• Senior Enlisted Medical Advisor, USSOCOM
• Senior Medic for the Army Rangers 18
Changes to the TCCC Guidelines
Published Direct Input
Prehospital From
Trauma Combat Medical
Literature Personnel
CoTCCC
Committee on
Tactical Combat Casualty Care
TCCC Changes 2008/2009
• No hemostatics in Care Under Fire
• Updated tourniquet use plan
• Combat Gauze
• Mgt of Tension Pneumothorax
• Mgt of Sucking Chest Wound
• Mgt of Penetrating Eye Trauma
• TCCC Casualty Card
• Third phase of care: “Tactical
Evacuation Care”
22
Unclassified
2 Special Operations Units
Experience with TCCC
• Kotwal – TCCC First Responders Conf 9/08
Practice
– 75th Ranger Regiment
– 482 casualties – 37 fatalities
• Pennardt – CoTCCC Practice
meeting 2/09
– Army Special Forces unit
– 201 casualties –Practice
12 fatalities
• Neither unit identified any preventable
deaths
• Both units train all combatants in TCCC
23
Tactical Combat Casualty Care
The Course
PHTLS Seventh Edition
• Introduction – Frank Butler
• Care Under Fire – Shawn Johnson
• Tactical Field Care – Frank Butler
• CASEVAC – Jay Johannigman, Tom Rich
• Triage – Paul Cordts
• CASEVAC, MEDEVAC, and Aeromedical
Evacuation – Jay Johannigman, Tom Rich
• Injuries from Explosives – Howard Champion
• Medical Support of Urban Ops – Bob Mabry
• Ethical Considerations – Frank Anders
• Burns in TCCC – Booker King
• Theater Medical Care – Brian Eastridge
• Pre-Mission Medical Planning – Russ Kotwal, Harold 25
Montgomery
Revised TCCC Curriculum
Completed
• Powerpoint presentations (5)
• Skill sheets (9)
• Instructor guides (5)
• Training videos (16)
• Maintain on websites – public domain
– MHS
– PHTLS
• Update with each change in guidelines
26
TCCC Training Options
27
Requests for TCCC
Training
• Sweden
• Spain
• Portugal
• Argentina
28
PHTLS support of TCCC
• Certification card
• TCCC Registry
• Instructor qualifications
• Test
• Curriculum used
• Skills sets trained
29
Combat
Trauma Care
Civilian Trauma Care
31
Is this
rural/wilderness
or
military
Principles vs Preferences
• Situation
• Conditions
• Skill, Knowledge, Ability, & Affect
• Resources
Military Field Triage
TCCC
Stages of Medical Care
• Care Under Fire • Echelon I
• Tactical Field Care
• Tactical Evacuation
• Echelon II
• Field Hospital
– FST
• Echelon III
– CSH
• MedEvac • Echelon IV
• Definitive medical care
• Echelon V
Care under Fire
Questions?
36
Care Under Fire
Guidelines
1. Return fire and take cover.
40
The Number One
Medical Priority
Unclassified
C-Spine Stabilization
44
Berator
45
45
Tactical Field Care
Guidelines
2. Airway Management
b. Casualty with airway obstruction or impending airway
obstruction:
- Chin lift or jaw thrust maneuver
- Nasopharyngeal airway
- assume position that best protects the airway
- Place unconscious casualty in recovery position.
- If previous measures unsuccessful:
- Surgical cricothyroidotomy (with lidocaine
if conscious)
46
IV Access – Key Point
• NOT ALL CASUALTIES NEED IVs!
– IV fluids not required for minor wounds
– IV fluids and supplies are limited – save them
for the casualties who really need them
– IVs take time
– Distract from other care required
– May disrupt tactical flow – waiting 10 minutes
to start an IV on a casualty who doesn’t need it
may endanger your unit unnecessarily
47
Tactical Field Care
Guidelines
Shock management
6. Fluid Resuscitation
• Assess for hemorrhagic shock;
– altered mental status (in the absence of head injury)
– weak or absent peripheral pulses
• best field indicators of shock.
Not in shock:
- No IV fluids necessary
- PO fluids permissible if conscious and can
swallow
48
Tactical Field Care
Guidelines
Shock management
6. Fluid Resuscitation
b. If in shock:
- Hextend, 500ml IV bolus
- Repeat once after 30 minutes if still
in shock.
- No more than 1000ml of Hextend
49
Hypotensive Resuscitation
Goals of Fluid Resuscitation Therapy
• Improved state of consciousness (if no TBI)
• Palpable radial pulse
– Corresponds roughly to systolic blood
pressure of 80 mm Hg
• Avoid over-resuscitation of shock from torso
wounds.
• Too much fluid volume may make internal
hemorrhage worse by “Popping the Clot.”
50
Pulse Oximetry Monitoring
• Pulse oximetry –
– heart rate
– percent of oxygenated blood (“O2 sat”)
• Sea Level
– 98% or higher
• 12,000 feet
• 86% = normal
51
Resuscitation
Resuscitation
• Damage Control Surgery (DCS)
– Control of hemorrhage
– Shunt vascular injury
– Staple bowel injuries
– Stabilize fractures
– Vac Pac Dressing
Does NOT have to
• Follow up surgery be done in same hospital
– 24-48 hours
– Definitive vascular care
– Repair bowel injuries
– Assure hemostasis
Damage Control Resuscitation
• Replace what is lost
• Whole blood
– PRBC
– Plasma
– Platelets
– Cryoprecipitate
• Ratio
– 1 PRBC : 1 plasma : ?
– 1 platelets : 1 Cryoprecipitate
– No crystalloid
Damage Control Resuscitation
Fatal
Cycle
Fluid
administration
without
easy vessels
William Blaisdale, MD Alex Haller, MD
Scudder Orator 1982 Scudder Orator 1994
Sternal Screw for IV fluids Intraosseous IV fluids in
pediatric patients
EZ - IO
Intraosseous Fluid Administration
Hemorrhage
Control
Hemorrhage control
• Compression bandages
• Tourniquets
• Hemostatic agents
– Cutaneous/local
– Systemic
• Factor XIV
YES!
Tourniquets
• Why were we wrong?
– Don’t confuse me with no data, my mind is
made up?
– The data does not support their use
– Data? What data?
– Well if you put them on, that determines the
level of the amputation. They distal extremity
will die.
– If they are too tight, the artery will be damaged.
– If they are too tight, the nerve will be damaged.
Hemorrhage control
Kragh et al
J Ortho Trauma ‘07
Tourniquets
Clinical Experience
• UK Joint Trauma Registry
• 66 months
• 1375 patients
• Tourniquets = 70 (5%) patients
• Tourniquets used = 107
• 2 or > = 24%
• 87% survival Brodie et al
JR Army Med corps ‘07
Tourniquets
Clinical Experience
• Vietnam KIA exsanguination = 9%
• OTF 31st Combat Support Hospital
• 12 months = 3444 patients
• Major vascular, traumatic amputation, tourniquet
• 165 patients
• Prehospital tourniquet = 67 (TK)
• Severe extremity injury no tourniquet = 98 (No TK)
• Bleeding control = TK=83% vs No TK-60%
• Secondary amputation = TK=6% vs No TK =9%
• Potentially preventable deaths = 57%
Beekley et al
J Trauma ‘08
Tourniquets
Clinical Experience
• Israeli Defense Forces
• 550 patients
• 91 prehospital tourniquets (16%)
• Injury to application 15 minutes
• Ischemia time = 83 minutes
• 78% effective
Lakstein et al
J Trauma ‘03
Special Operation Forces Tactical
Tourniquet
SOFT-T
Combat Applied Tactical
Tourniquet
CATT
Application of CATT
Emergency Medical Tourniquet
EMT
Tourniquets
Cravat/Windlass 85
Tourniquets in WWII
Wolff AMEDD J April 1945
86
Hemostatic Agents
• QuikClot
• Hemcon
• Wound Stat
• Combat Gauze
Mechanism of action
• Absorb water
– QuikClot
– Combat Gauze
• Increase clotting
– Hemcon
Hemostatic Agents
• Complications
• Vascular damage
– WoundStat
• Local hypothermia
– QuikClot
• Difficulty in placement
– All powder/granular agents
Courtesy Dr. Bijan Kheirabadi 90
Combat Gauze
• 3 inch x 4 yard roll of gauze
• Impregnated with kaolin
• Material that causes blood to clot
Torso Extremity
Hemostatic Agent Tourniquet
Hospital
Tactical Field Care Guidelines
2. Airway Management
a. Unconscious casualty without airway obstruction:
- Chin lift or jaw thrust maneuver
- Nasopharyngeal airway
- Place casualty in recovery position
94
Open chest
wound
Open chest wound
• Re-establish ventilation
• Air movement out airway not chest wall
– Close open hole
• Relive compartment syndrome
– Needle into pleural cavity
– Needle not stop in chest wall
– 8 cm
– 14 gauge
Open Pneumothorax Mgt
98
Pain Control – Fentanyl
Lozenge
Access
Trauma
12 10 30 0
10 012 5
Scene
Center
transport
ED
Surgeon
Community 12 10 12 10 25 25 15 10 20 OR staff
Hospital
Ready OR
to OR
0 50 100 150 Hemorrhage control
Minutes
Indications to bypass
Severe trauma
• Physiologic reasons
– Shock
– Airway & ventilation
– Major Hemorrhage
• Anatomic
– Penetration - head, neck, torso, proximal limbs
– Crush torso
– Major fractures
• Mechanism of injury
– Major vehicle damage
– Fall from height
Failure to fly syndrome
Contra-indications to bypass4
Time
• Technical difficulties
– Inability to maintain airway
• BVM is not working
• Separation of esophagus & trachea required
– Intubation in the field unsuccessful or not trained
• Surgical airway necessary
– Uncontrollable hemorrhage
• External
• Internal
• Critical conditions
– Cardiac Arrest
– Ventilation compromise
• Tension pneumothorax
• Major fail chest
• Medical Control decision
– Shock
– Transportation time > 50 minutes
Contra-indications to bypass2
Mechanism of injury
• How important is it ?
• > 75 % go home within 6 hours
• 1 year
– 641 patients in AR
– 2 deaths
– 59 operations
– 120 admissions
Plan for
Louisiana Trauma Care
System
Stages of Medical Care
• Care Under Fire • Echelon I
• Tactical Field Care
• Tactical Evacuation
• Echelon II
• Field Hospital
– FST
• Echelon III
– CSH
• MedEvac • Echelon IV
• Definitive medical care
• Echelon V
Louisiana Echelon for Trauma Care
• Echelon I
– EMS system
– ALS care
– State wide communication
• Echelon II
– Critical Access Hospitals
– <25 beds
– ED Provider in-house
– Physician available
• Echelon III
– Rural Hospitals 25-60 beds
– ED physician staffed
– Surgeon available
– Orthopedics available
– OR staffed
– Blood bank
Louisiana Echelon for Trauma Care
• Echelon III
– Level III trauma center
– Neurosurgeon available
– OR rapid access 24 hours
– 24 hour blood bank
– CT, MRI
– Interventional Radiology
• Echelon IV
– Level II/I Trauma Center
– In house OR
– 24 hour everything – 15 minutes
– ED physicians & Surgeons dedicated to patient care
SE Louisiana Trauma system
Field to Trauma Center
• Physiologic reasons
– Shock
– Airway & ventilation
– Major Hemorrhage
• Anatomic
– Penetration - head, neck,
torso, proximal limbs
– Crush torso
– Major fractures
• < 50 minutes
Rural Trauma Organization
System
Patient care movement
• EMS triage
– Hospital best able to care for patient
• Minor - closest hospital
• Major
– level III
– DCS
– DCR
• Serious – Trauma Center
– ACS anatomical
– ACS physiological
Rural Trauma Organization System
• Trauma patient care
• Critical Access
– No serious patients via EMS
– Treat and release
– Understand trauma if walk-in
• Rural
– DCR
– DCS
– Rapid assessment & move
• Trauma Center (III, II, I)
• Totally prepared
Rural Trauma Organization System
• Trauma Educational System
– Critical Access
• RTTCS
• ATLS ?
– Rural
• ATLS
• DCR/DCS
– Level III
• ATOM
• DCS/DCR
– Level II, I
• Teaches above
Rural Trauma Organization System
• Trauma Transportation System
• EMS triage
• ACS Anatomic & Physiologic
– Trauma center (within 50 minutes)
– Rural hospital
• DCS/DCR
• Immediate transfer to Trauma Center
EMS triage Hospital Triage
Regional Regional
Medical
Medical
Center
Center
Rural Rural
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Critical Access Critical Access
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Trauma Education System
ATOM
Trauma Center
Rural Rural
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Critical Access Critical Access
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Trauma Education System
RTTDC
Trauma Center
Rural Rural
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Critical Access Critical Access
Rural Rural
Critical Access Critical Access
Summary
• Re-assess rural trauma patients needs
• Re-assess rural trauma care
– EMS
– Critical Access hospitals
– Rural Hospitals
– Trauma Center
121
Transportation of dead patients is bad
CoTCCC
Open Pneumothorax Mgt
Frank
What Mel isn't telling you is that he saved this
guys life. I happened
to be in the bay when they got here. The patient is
recovering following
a Left upper lobectomy and chest wall
reconstruction
Would echo Mel's comments
EKG/Defib pad yes
Asherman no
j