Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 39

Procurement Chain Management

A Strategic Implementation Process

1-1
Product supply management is nothing but Procurement
Strategy, which is integral to corporate strategy.
A corporations corporate strategy and procurement
strategy must fit with each other or otherwise, both will
fail.
We will discuss the strategic decision making issues of
procurement and also how managers make decisions
related to both corporate and procurement strategy.
The discussions should facilitate understanding of the
issues of strategic implementation.

1-2
The new global business environment

Fierce competition
Introduction of products with shorter and shorter
life cycles
Heightened expectations of customer
Continuing advances in communications and
transportation technologies (e.g. mobile
communication, Internet, overnight delivery)

1-3
Cost impact of managing inventory

It is estimated that the grocery industry could save


$30 billion (10% of its operating cost) by using
effective logistics strategies.
Compaq computer estimates it lost $500 million to
$1 billion in sales because its laptops and desktops
were not available when and where customers
were ready to buy them (Compaq does not exist
anymore).

1-4
Managing costs in the supply arena

JIT, TQM, lean mfg. techniques have reduced


manufacturing costs as much as they could.
One area that yet requires improvement:
Inventory Procurement. See the following
examples:
It takes a typical box of cereals more than 3
months to get from factory to supermarket.
It takes a new car, on average, 15 days to travel
from factory to dealership.

1-5
The Success Stories

In 10 years, Wal-Mart transformed itself by


changing its logistics system. It has the highest
sales per square foot, inventory turnover and
operating profit of any discount retailer.
Dell Computer has outperformed the competition
in terms of shareholder value growth over the
eight years period, 1988-1996, by over 3,000%

1-6
What exactly is procurement?

All stages and parties involved, directly or


indirectly, in fulfilling a customer request
Internally, the procurement process includes all
functions involved in fulfilling a customer request
(product development, marketing, operations,
distribution, finance, customer service).
Externally, it includes the suppliers, vendors,
manufacturers, transportation, and distributors,
that exist to transform raw materials to final
products and supply those products to customers.

1-7
A procurement or a supply example

Let us briefly go over how selling a simple box of


detergent through a retail store involves so many
parties and contractual arrangements and why each one
must function effectively to make the process efficient.

1-8
Buying Cereals from Wal-Mart

Timber Paper Tenneco


Company Manufacturer Packaging

P&G or other
Wal- Mart Customer
Manufacturer

Corn Plastic
manufacturer Producer

1-9
The Objectives of a Procurement Chain

Primary purpose is satisfying customer needs.


Maximizing the overall value created
Value, measured monetarily, refers to: the difference
between what the final product is worth to the customer
(price the customer is willing to pay) and the effort,
collectively, the procurement chain expends in filling the
customers request (the collective costs)
Therefore, procurement profitability would be: the
difference between revenue generated from the customer
and the overall cost across the entire Procurement chain.

1-10
While managing procurement process is important for
managing costs and profits and delivering value to the
customer, it is not easy to do.

It requires understanding, cooperation, coordination, and


information sharing among several trading partners both
internal and internal.

And, given that there are so many parties, it is indeed a


formidable task to make all of them work towards a common
objective.

1-11
Why should procurement be a challenging
problem?
Procurement chain network is often very
complex
Procurement chain partners have conflicting
objectives.
Consequently, making everyone to agree is
not an easy task.

1-12
Conflicting Objectives
in the Procurement Chain
1. Purchasing wants
Stable volume requirements
Flexible delivery time
Little variation in mix
Large quantities
2. Manufacturing wants
Long run production
High quality
High productivity
Low production cost

Tell me why some of these objectives are conflicting.

1-13
Conflicting Objectives
in the Procurement Chain
3. Warehousing wants
Low inventory
Reduced transportation costs
Quick replenishment capability
4. Customers want
Short order lead time
High in stock
Enormous variety of products
Low prices
Tell me why some of these objectives are conflicting.

1-14
While we agree on the importance of
procurement, how does it translate
into a corporate strategy?
Achieving strategic Fit
Matching multiple strategies

2-16
Business strategies change over time

In the 1990s, outsourcing was the focus of many


manufacturers.
Example: Nike Shoes
Nikes strategy: R and D on one hand and
marketing, sales, and distribution on the other.
Example 2: CISCO
CISCOs strategy: Focus on Internet sales;
increased productivity and save on business
expenses.
Example 3: Apple Computers
Apple computers: outsourced most of its mfg.

2-17
The Landscape changed

In 2001, Nike reported a profit shortfall due to


inventory buildup, shortage for others, and late
deliveries.
In 2000, CISCO was forced to announce 2.25 B
write-down for obsolete inventory.
In 1999, Apple had huge customer dissatisfaction
because of shortage of G4 chip supplied by
Motorola.

2-18
What went wrong?

In the examples, the difficulties reflect problems with


procurement chain strategies.
Nike, CISCO, Apple have short product life cycles.
When technologies changed, uncertainties related to
customer demand increased.
Procurement landscape changed significantly with the
introduction of independent, private, and consortium-based
e-market places.
With changes in procurement landscape, both problems
and opportunities also changed.
But, Nike, CISCO, and Apple were not able to react to
these changes and formulate a new corporate and
procurement strategy.
2-19
The need for a good strategy

The most important requirement for sustainability


is a well-formulated corporate strategy;
A corporate strategy, in turn, requires forming sub
strategies such as product strategy, procurement
strategy, marketing strategy, and so on. And,
A firm should continually evaluate its corporate
strategy and its sub strategies and ensure that they
are appropriate for a changing environment.

2-20
Competitive Strategy let managers answer
questions such as
Relative to competitors, how should my firm
satisfy customers?
What products and services should we offer?
Should we focus on cost or should we focus more
on service and quick response?
How much customization should we allow on our
products?
Compare the competitive strategies of: Lands End
and a local retailer.

2-21
Competitive Strategy and procurement Strategy
The relationship
Competitive strategy

New Product Marketing & Operations Distribution Service


Development Sales

procurement Strategy

Supplier Operations Logistics


Strategy Strategy Strategy
See the Dell example Matching competitive and
procurement strategies

Suppose Dells competitive strategy is to deliver a product


within 72 hours of receiving an order but is product
suppliers, on average take 7 days to resupply inventory,
then, Dell is not going to be able to accomplish its
competitive strategy.
There is a lack of strategic fit.
Also, look at Dells competitive strategy.

2-24
The Dells competitive and procurement
strategies
Competitive strategy: provide a large variety of
customizable computer-related products at a reasonable
price and to let customers select from thousands of
configurations.
procurement strategy: Two possible options: 1. Efficient
procurement limiting variety and exploiting economies of
scale or 2. High flexibility and responsiveness producing a
large variety of products.
Dells procurement Strategy is No. 2
Consequently, Dell focuses on designing easily
customizable products, common platforms and
components that can be assembled quickly.

2-25
Achieving Strategic Fit Achieved
The steps involved

Step 1: Understanding the customer and


procurement uncertainty
Step 2: Understanding the procurement
capabilities
Step 3: Achieve strategic fit

2-26
First, take a look at two types of uncertainties Demand
Uncertainty and procurement chain uncertainty

Demand uncertainty: arises because of changing


customer needs predicting demand for a product or
service absolutely is impossible. This is an external
factor controlled by the customer.
Procurement chain uncertainty, in contrast, arises
because of uncertainties within a procurement
process.
While a firm would like to meet 100% of customer
demand, it may not be able to do so because its
procurement is unable to because of multiple reasons
that were listed under procurement uncertainty.

2-27
Demand uncertainty
(customer-induced)
Usually products that are less mature (electronics,
computers) have greater demand uncertainty (unlike
Salt or milk).
Forecasting demand for such products is very difficult
and usually not very accurate.
With forecasting difficulties, matching demand
against product and services supply is difficult.
For uncertain demand products, prices are not steady
and varies depending on demand levels.
At the same time, a firm could earn greater margin
from uncertain demand products.

2-28
Procurement chain uncertainty, on the contrary, arises
due to constraints within a procurement

procurement uncertainty: The portion of


uncertainty introduced by procurement attributes
such as: production breakdowns, low product
yields, poor quality and rework, procurement
capacity is limited (because of limited production
facilities, availability of raw materials, labor, and
numerous other factors);
Supply capability is inflexible and cannot increase
with increased product demand;
Also, changes in production process could lead to
bottlenecks.
2-29
Step 1: Therefore, understand both demand and procurement
chain uncertainties

Identify the needs of the customer segment being


served (retail, wholesale, discount, high-end
customers)
Quantity of product needed in each lot (large,
small)
Response time customers will tolerate
Variety of products needed
Service level required
Price of the product
Desired rate of innovation in the product
2-30
Step 2: Evaluate procurement capabilities

A procurement can rarely meet all demands of all


of its customers. Why?

How many of the following demands of customers


can we meet?
Responding to wide range of product demands
Meeting short lead times
Handling a large variety of products
Meeting high service level possible
Where do we compromise?

2-31
Given procurement limitations, responding to
customer demand would require a compromise

How responsive should a procurement be?


Quicker response implies increased costs
(responsiveness).
Delayed response implies lower costs (efficient).
Therefore, a firm must compromise between
quicker response and lower costs and strike a
balance that suits its objectives.
See the graph.

2-32
A comparison of cost and responsiveness
Responsiveness

High

Low
Cost
High Low
2-33
Efficient and Responsive procurement chains A Comparison
Efficient Responsive
Primary goal Supply demand at the lowest Respond quickly to demand
cost

Product design strategy Min. product cost Modularity to allow


postponement

Pricing strategy Lower margins Higher margins

Mfg strategy High utilization Capacity flexibility

Inventory strategy Minimize inventory Buffer inventory

Lead time strategy Reduce but not at expense of Aggressively reduce even if
greater cost costs are significant

Supplier selection strategy Cost and low quality Speed, flexibility, quality

Transportation strategy Greater reliance on low cost Greater reliance on responsive


modes (fast) modes
3. Achieving Strategic Fit

Now that a firm has assessed customer needs, demand


uncertainties, and procurement chain constraints and
uncertainties, it is time to make the two fit with each
other.
How?
In most cases, by offering high responsiveness to
products with high demand uncertainties and
Striving towards more cost efficiencies for products
with low demand uncertainties.
Compare these two products: computers and cheese.

2-35
Let us revisit Dells strategy

Dell proposed a competitive strategy that it will


ship ordered consumer products within 72 hours;
a relatively high response rate.
What are the factors that Dell must consider?

2-36
Dell Achieving Strategic Fit

First, Dell should be able to forecast customer


demand with some degree of accuracy (demand
uncertainty).
Decide how much of this demand uncertainty it
can meet e.g. we can offer 72 hours shipment in
the case of jackets and overcoats but not for school
bags (implied demand uncertainty).
Also, note other items that Dell must consider:

2-37
Dell Achieving Strategic Fit

Decide whether its procurement chain from manufacturers to


trucking companies to warehouses would be able to meet its goal of
72 hours shipment.
Decide how much inventory Dell should carry and how much
should its procurement chain partners carry.
How soon can Dell inform manufacturers of changing fashions and
demands?
Ascertain the flexibility (in procurement of raw materials, mfg.
capacity, labor, etc.) that its procurement chain partners have (or
do not have)?
Consider the cost of all of these factors and decide on the
responsiveness spectrum or the zone of fit.
See the next slide.

2-38
Remember the following about Strategic Fit

Two key points


there is no right procurement chain strategy
independent of competitive strategy
there is only a right procurement chain strategy
for a given competitive strategy

2-39
What did we learn

Formulating corporate strategy is easier than


implementing strategy.
Strategy implementation requires the cooperation of
both internal and external parties and
In turn, that requires common objectives and common
benefits.
Strategy is not an one time implementation but
something that requires constant redesign.
Procurement or supply management is one of the
largest assets in an organization and
The implication of managing it well has significant
consequences to an organization.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi