Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 54

Cost Allocation: Joint Products

and Byproducts

Chapter 16

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 1


Learning Objective 1

Identify the splitoff point(s)


in a joint-cost situation.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 2


Joint-Cost Basics

Joint costs Joint products

Byproduct Splitoff point

Separable costs

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 3


Joint-Cost Basics

Raw milk

Cream Liquid Skim

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 4


Joint-Cost Basics

Coal

Gas Benzyl Tar

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 5


Learning Objective 2

Distinguish joint products


from byproducts.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 6


Joint Products and Byproducts

Main Products
Joint Products Byproducts

High Low

Sales Value

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 7


Learning Objective 3

Explain why joint costs should be


allocated to individual products.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 8


Why Allocate Joint Costs?

to compute inventory cost and cost of goods sold


to determine cost reimbursement under contracts
for insurance settlement computations
for rate regulation
for litigation purposes

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 9


Learning Objective 4

Allocate joint costs using


four different methods.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 10


Approaches to Allocating
Joint Costs

Two basic ways to allocate


joint costs to products are:

Approach 1: Approach 2:
Market based Physical measure

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 11


Approach 1: Market-based Data

Sales value at splitoff method


Estimated net realizable value (NRV) method
Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 12


Allocating Joint Costs Example

10,000 units of A at a
selling price of $10 = $100,000
Joint processing
cost is $200,000
10,500 units of B at a
selling price of $30 = $315,000

11,500 units of C at a
selling price of $20 = $230,00 Splitoff point
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 13
Allocating Joint Costs Example

A B C Total
Sales Value $100,000 $315,000 $230,000 $645,000
Allocation of
Joint Cost
100 645 31,008
315 645 97,674
230 645 71,318
200,000
Gross margin $ 68,992 $217,326 $158,682 $445,000
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 14
Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example

Assume all of the units produced


of B and C were sold.
2,500 units of A (25%)
remain in inventory.
What is the gross margin
percentage of each product?

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 15


Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example

Product A Revenues: 7,500 units $10.00 $75,000


Cost of goods sold:
Joint product costs $31,008
Less ending inventory
$31,008 25% 7,752 23,256
Gross margin $51,744

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 16


Sales Value at Splitoff
Method Example

Product A:
($75,000 $ 23,256) $75,000 = 69%
Product B:
($315,000 $97,674) $315,000 = 69%
Product C:
($230,000 $71,318) $230,000 = 69%

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 17


Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example

Assume that Oklahoma Company can process


products A, B, and, C further into A1, B1, and C1.
The new sales values after further processing are:

A1: B1: C1:


10,000 $12.00 10,500 $33.00 11,500 $21.00
= $120,000 = $346,500 = $241,500
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 18
Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example

Additional processing (separable) costs are as follows:

A1: $35,000 B1: $46,500 C1: $51,500

What is the estimated net realizable value of each


product at the splitoff point?

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 19


Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example

Product A1: $120,000 $35,000 = $85,000


Product B1: $346,500 $46,500 = $300,000
Product C1: $241,500 $51,500 = $190,000
How much of the joint cost is allocated
to each product?

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 20


Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example

To A1:
85 575 $200,000 = $29,565
To B1:
300 575 $200,000 = $104,348
To C1:
190 575 $200,000 = $66,087

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 21


Estimated Net Realizable Value
(NRV) Method Example

Allocated Separable Inventory


joint costs costs costs
A1 $ 29,565 $ 35,000 $ 64,565
B1 104,348 46,500 150,848
C1 66,087 51,500 117,587
Total $200,000 $133,000 $333,000

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 22


Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
This method entails three steps:
Step 1:
Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.
Step 2:
Use the overall gross-margin percentage
and deduct the gross margin from the
final sales values to obtain the total
costs that each product should bear.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 23
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method

Step 3:
Deduct the expected separable costs from the
total costs to obtain the joint-cost allocation.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 24


Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method

What is the expected final sales value of total


production during the accounting period?
Product A1: $120,000
Product B1: 346,500
Product C1: 241,500
Total $708,000

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 25


Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method

Step 1:
Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.
Expected final sales value $708,000
Deduct joint and separable costs 333,000
Gross margin $375,000
Gross margin percentage:
$375,000 $708,000 = 52.966%
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 26
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 2:
Deduct the gross margin.
Sales Gross Cost of
Value Margin Goods sold
Product A1: $120,000 $ 63,559 $ 56,441
Product B1: 346,500 183,527 162,973
Product C1: 241,500 127,913 113,587
Total $708,000 $375,000 $333,000
($1 rounding)
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 27
Constant Gross-Margin
Percentage NRV Method
Step 3:
Deduct separable costs.
Cost of Separable Joint costs
goods sold costs allocated
Product A1: $ 56,441 $ 35,000 $ 21,441
Product B1: 162,973 46,500 116,473
Product C1: 113,587 51,500 62,087
Total $333,000 $133,000 $200,000
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 28
Approach 2: Physical
Measure Method Example

$200,000 joint cost

20,000 48,000 12,000


pounds A pounds B pounds C

Product A Product B Product C


$50,000 $120,000 $30,000
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 29
Learning Objective 5

Explain why the sales value at


splitoff method is preferred
when allocating joint costs.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 30


Choosing a Method
Why is the sales value at splitoff method widely used?

It measures the value It does not anticipate


of the joint product subsequent management
immediately. decisions.

It uses a
It is simple.
meaningful basis.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 31
Choosing a Method

The purpose of the joint-cost allocation is


important in choosing the allocation method.
The physical-measure method is a more
appropriate method to use in rate regulation.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 32


Avoiding Joint Cost Allocation

Some companies refrain from allocating joint


costs and instead carry their inventories
at estimated net realizable value.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 33


Learning Objective 6

Explain why joint costs


are irrelevant in a
sell-or-process-further decision.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 34


Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making
Assume that products A, B, and C can be sold
at the splitoff point or processed further
into A1, B1, and C1.
Selling Selling Additional
Units price price costs
10,000 A: $10 A1: $12 $35,000
10,500 B: $30 B1: $33 $46,500
11,500 C: $20 C1: $21 $51,500
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 35
Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making
Should A, B, or C be sold at the splitoff
point or processed further?
Product A: Incremental revenue $20,000
Incremental cost $35,000 = ($15,000)
Product B: Incremental revenue $31,500
Incremental cost $46,500 = ($15,000)
Product C: Incremental revenue $11,500
Incremental cost $51,500 = ($40,000)
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 36
Learning Objective 7

Account for byproducts


using two different methods.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 37


Accounting for Byproducts

Method A:
The production method recognizes byproducts
at the time their production is completed.
Method B:
The sale method delays recognition of
byproducts until the time of their sale.

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 38


Accounting for Byproducts
Example

Main Products Byproducts


(Yards) (Yards)
Production 1,000 400
Sales 800 300
Ending inventory 200 100
Sales price $13/yard $1.00/yard
No beginning finished goods inventory

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 39


Accounting for Byproducts
Example

Joint production costs for joint


(main) products and byproducts:
Material $2,000
Manufacturing labor 3,000
Manufacturing overhead 4,000
Total production cost $9,000

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 40


Accounting for Byproducts
Method A

Method A: The production method


What is the value of ending inventory
of joint (main) products?
$9,000 total production cost
$400 net realizable value of the byproduct
= $8,600 net production cost for the joint products

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 41


Accounting for Byproducts
Method A

200 1,000 $8,600 = $1,720 is the value


assigned to the 200 yards in ending inventory.
What is the cost of goods sold?
Joint production costs $9,000
Less byproduct revenue 400
Less main product inventory 1,720
Cost of goods sold $6,880
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 42
Accounting for Byproducts
Method A

Income Statement (Method A)


Revenues: (800 yards $13) $10,400
Cost of goods sold 6,880
Gross margin $ 3,520
What is the gross margin percentage?
$3,520 $10,400 = 33.85%

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 43


Accounting for Byproducts
Method A

What are the inventoriable costs?


Main product: 200 1,000 $8,600 = $1,720
Byproduct: 100 $1.00 = $100

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 44


Journal Entries Method A

Work in Process 2,000


Accounts Payable 2,000
To record direct materials purchased and used
in production
Work in Process 7,000
Various Accounts 7,000
To record conversion costs in the joint process
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 45
Journal Entries Method A

Byproduct Inventory 400


Finished Goods 8,600
Work in Process 9,000
To record cost of goods completed
Cost of Goods Sold 6,880
Finished Goods 6,880
To record the cost of the main product sold
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 46
Journal Entries Method A

Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400


Revenues 10,400
To record the sale of the main product

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 47


Accounting for Byproducts
Method B
Method B: The sale method
What is the value of ending inventory of
joint (main) products?
200 1,000 $9,000 = $1,800
No value is assigned to the 400 yards of
byproducts at the time of production.
The $300 resulting from the sale of
byproducts is reported as revenues.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 48
Accounting for Byproducts
Method B

Income Statement (Method B)


Revenues: Main product (800 $13) $10,400
Byproducts sold 300
Total revenues $10,700
Cost of goods sold:
Joint production costs 9,000
Less main product inventory 1,800 $ 7,200
Gross margin $ 3,200
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 49
Accounting for Byproducts
Method B

What is the gross margin percentage?


$3,200 $10,700 = 29.91%
What are the inventoriable costs?
Main product: 200 1,000 $9,000 = $1,800
By-product: -0-

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 50


Journal Entries Method B

Work in Process 2,000


Accounts Payable 2,000
To record direct materials purchased and used
in production
Work in Process 7,000
Various Accounts 7,000
To record conversion costs in the joint process
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 51
Journal Entries Method B

Finished Goods 9,000


Work in Process 9,000
To record cost of goods completed
Cost of Goods Sold 7,200
Finished Goods 7,200
To record the cost of the main product sold

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 52


Journal Entries Method B

Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400


Revenues 10,400
To record the sale of the main product
Cash or Accounts Receivable 300
Revenues 300
To record the sale of the byproduct

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 53


End of Chapter 16

2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster 16 - 54

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi