Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Six Sigma
Assignment # 3
How the Quality Product and service is aligned with the positioning statement of the
product and service? Draw and decompose the quality parameters from the Positioning
statement of one Organisation. The report should consists of
•About the Organisations:
•Various Products
•Quality of its products Vis-a Vis its competitors
•Positioning Statement of One product
•Decomposition of the Positioning statements to Quality parameters
•How consumers feels about the quality of service or product Vs. Quality commitment
set by the Organisation. through positioning statement.
•Your Opinion: Whether the company justifies its positioning statement with product or
service it provides. Your suggestion to the company. What you could have done …
Nature of the Assignment: Individual
Submission Through: Turn It In
Quality Management 2
WHICH PERFORMANCE YOU WANT…
I II III
IV
The best performance:
VARIATION
1 1
68.27%
2 2
95.45%
3 3
99.73%
Do you mean to say, whether you like it or not, 99.73%
of the observations will lie within Average +/- 3 s.d.?
Characterization of the pattern
Variability is estimated through standard deviation.
Variation /
Standard deviation Mean or Average
Center / Location
Process capability refers to the natural variation of a process relative to the variation
allowed by the design specifications. It is defined as the ratio of the range of the
design specifications (the tolerance range) to the range of the process variation, which
for most firms is typically 6sigma.
Cp = Tolerance Range/ Process Range
Tolerances are design specifications reflecting customer requirements for a product.
They specify a range of values above and below a designed target value (also referred
to as the nominal value), within which product units must fall to be acceptable.
PROCESS CAPABILITY
Process Capability
= USL-LSL/6
Mean = 85.8
LSL USL
VARIATION
ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE
Vs.
SPECIFICATIONS
Or
Customer Requirements
PROCESS CAPABILITY
1.33 < Cpk < 1.50 Satisfactory it indicates that process quality is adequate,
material substitution may be allowed, and no
stringent quality
control is needed.
1.50 < Cpk < 2.00 Excellent it indicates that process quality exceeds
"Satisfactory"
Actual vs Specified Comparison
Are you comfortable with the status quo? You want to reduce
the variability from to 1?
Reduce the variation by improving the process:
Are you comfortable with the status quo? You still want to
further reduce the variability from 1 to 2?
Reduce the variation by improving the process:
Oh, Yes!
You have got it!!!
3 3 3 3 T=12 3
6 3 0.002 ppm
Tolerance(T) or 2 ppb
LSL USL
Wait a bit! Every time you are assuming that average has always
been maintain at target. Is it practical? What happens if the
average shifts to a distance of 1.5 3 from the target to the worse
Process Shift
The reason for this discrepancy was determined by Motorola in
their early days in developing Six Sigma. Motorola determined ,
through their own experience that process drifts overtime and
they referred to this phenomenon as “Long Term Dynamic Mean
Variation”. This variation generally falls between 1.4 to 1.6
sigma.
Six Sigma with Shift (Short-term):
Let us assume, average can go as away as 1.5 times s.d.
from the target.
T=12 3
3.4 ppm
4.5 3 1.5 3 1.5 3
Today we thought that
the sigma level to be of
6 3 Six, in the long run it
Tolerance(T)
LSL USL becomes 4.5 .
Six Sigma as a Goal
– In most situations, it
makes sense to base sigma
calculations on First Pass
Yield First Pass Yield = Final Yield =
Number of items Number of items that
that make it through are defect free
error-free (no AFTER errors are
corrections) corrected
SIX SIGMA MEASURE
7
Yield = 1 –( 5 x 100 ) x 100