3A

CRITICAL APPRAISAL

 MARELLA DEVINA
 MERHYNA TRI M
 RINA VIVI AUDIANA
 YOGI IMAM M

“ Efektivitas fogging
terhadap pencegahan
dengue haemorrhagic
fever “
 Evidence Based Practice

Focused Question
“ Efektivitas fogging terhadap pencegahan dengue haemorrhagic fever “

Published Evidence

“ Optimal Timing of Insecticide Fogging to Minimize

Dengue Cases: Modeling Dengue Transmission among
Various Seasonalities and Transmission Intensities “
1. PENULIS

NAMA
Mika Oki PENDIDIKAN
Toshihiko Sunahara Tidak di cantumkan

Masahiro Hashizume
Taro Yamamoto

INSTITUSI
Department of International

PROFESI Health, Institute of Tropical

Tidak di cantumkan Medicine, The Global Center of
Excellence, Nagasaki
University, Nagasaki, Japan
2. KETERANGAN PENDUKUNG
A
25 Referensi

18 Jurnal 3 Textbook

3 Article Who

B
Tanggal Update

Received June 6, 2011

Accepted September 2, 2011

Published October 25, 2011

3. TINGKAT KEBENARAN

4. TRANSPARASI PENANGGUNG JAWAB ISI

Editor: Roberto Barrera, Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention, Puerto Rico, United States of America

* E-mail: mrs_southern_wind@yahoo.co.jp
5. TRANSPARASI SPONSOR

6. KEBIJAKAN IKLAN DAN EDITORIAL

7. UNSUR PELENGKAP
Ada lampiran data pendukung statistik

8. KERAHASIAN
Anonimitas sampel terjaga
Grading Evidence
Study Predictive
 Critical appraisal Efektivitas fogging
terhadap pencegahan dengue
haemorrhagic fever
Is the study question relevant?
Relevan
Does the study add anything new?

What type of research question being asked?

Apakah fogging efektif dalam mencegah
DHF ?
• Was the study design appropriate for the research
question?
Desain penelitian study prediksi
• Did the study methods address the most important
potential source of bias?
IYA
• Was the study performed according to original
protocol?
Penelitian berjalan sesuai dengan rancangan
tanpa kesulitan yang berarti
• Does the study stated a hypothesis
waktu yang tepat untuk fogging adalah mulai
musim hujan dan puncak prevalensi
• Was the statistical analyses performed correctly?
Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis statistik
•Do the data justify the conclusions?

•Are there any conflict of interest?

 Appraising Cross Sectional
• Was the study sample clearly defined?

Jelas
• Was a representative sample achieved (e.g. was the response
rate sufficiently high)?
Tercapai, karna fogging pada waktu yang telah ditentukan
penelitian efektif
 Appraising Cross Sectional
• Were all relevant exposures, potential confounding factors and

outcomes measured accurately?

Relevan, faktor perancu dan hasilnya di hitung secara

akurat

• Were patients with a wide range of severity of disease

assessed?

Tingkat keparahan dari penyakit dinilai ketika musim

hujan terjadi, dan transmisi endemik

TERIMA KASIH .... 