Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In order to celebrate and receive credit for this C.R.A.P.P.Y.E. day, you will need
to participate fully in the activity. This will require each participant to be creative
and to think “outside the box.”
See DAILY WORK CHART – this will be factored into individual grades.
Deadlines: Deadlines:
On or Before May 14, 2013 Proposals Due
May 15, 2013 Approvals returned
May 15, 2013 Begin work on projects (If Approved)
June 5, 2013 C.R.A.P.P.Y.E. Day
*As part of the review and approval process, your project idea must conform to
ethical guidelines. Ethical guidelines MUST be followed throughout the project.
Failure to follow ethical guidelines will result in the project receiving a zero
grade (0)!
You may be wondering what is meant by the term "response". In this experiment we will only be looking
at whether or not the response is negative or indifferent. "Negative", however, will range from:
-Lowly Negative: A facial expression of discomfort (e.g., 'stink eye' or 'angry eyebrows')
-Moderately negative: Verbal adversity (e.g., "What!?" or "I don't feel comfortable answering that
question.")
-Highly Negative: Physical adversity (e.g., 'Walking away from the survey without a farewell' or
'Physical harm to the surveyor')
-Indifferent: Showing no facial, verbal, or physical adversity (e.g., Answering the question without a
fuss)
What should go on my trifold…
1. Creative Title
2. Background information/ Historical Perspective
3. Hypothesis (remember you are not graded on this if its correct)
4. The Research/Overview of your project – operational definitions
5. The Procedure/ Process – what you did
6. The DATA
7. Conclusions / Results/ Findings…
Other things to consider…
a. What went right…
b. What went wrong…
c. Things you would change/ do differently…
d. things you failed to think about/ take into account…
e. MOST importantly…what did you learn from your research
• About the process
• About the topics being explored (operational definition)
What should the tri-fold look like?
Project Analysis
What went right?
What went wrong?
What would you
do differently?