Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RESOLUTION
R.A. NO. 9285
April 2, 2004
What is meant by alternative
dispute resolution or ADR?
This is the choice given to parties to a
dispute to choose the mode of resolving
their differences either through
arbitration, mediation, conciliation and
other similar modes thereby avoiding
costly and time-consuming court
litigation.
State’s policy on ADR
Under the ADR Law, the state has declared it as its
policy to promote party autonomy in the resolution of
disputes or the freedom of the parties to make their
own arrangements to resolve their disputes.
The state shall encourage and actively promote the
use of ADR as an important means to achieve speedy
and impartial justice and de-clog court dockets;
provide means for the use of ADR as an efficient tool
and an alternative procedure for the resolution of
appropriate cases; enlist private sector participation
in the settlement of disputes through ADR.
Ultimate goal of ADR
The ultimate goal of ADR as
manifested in the declaration of
state policy, is the empowerment
of disputants in the manner of
resolving their disputes.
Effect of ADR
As an offshoot of the
empowerment of disputants in a
dispute, it has the effect of de-
clogging court dockets and allowing
them to focus their judicial
attention and resources to
resolving other more pressing
issues before them.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
System
Any process or procedure used to resolve a
dispute or controversy,other than by
adjudication of a presiding judge of a court or
an officer of a government agency, in which a
neutral third party participates to assist in the
resolution of issues, which includes
arbitration, mediation, conciliation, early
neutral evaluation, mini-trial, or any
combination thereof.
Arbitration
A voluntary dispute resolution process in
which one or more arbitrators, appointed in
accordance with the agreement of the
parties, or rules promulgated pursuant to R.A.
NO. 9285, resolve a dispute by rendering an
award.
RESPONSIBILITIES IN COURT
ANNEXED MEDIATION
OTHER RELEVANT ROLES
The Marketing of Cases as Mediatable
MCLE Requirements includes five (5)
units in ADR
Encourage lawyers to participate in
mediation unlike in the Barangay
Justice System
ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURT
ANNEXED MEDIATION
ROLE OF THE JUDGE
1. Referral by the trial courts of Mediatable
cases is Mandatory
2. The court shall impose appropriate
sanctions upon parties who fail or refuse to
appear before the mediation center
3. The designation/selection of mediator is
affirmed/confirmed by the Judge
4. The compromise agreement entered into is
submitted for consideration and approval
ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES
AND FUNCTIONS OF
JUDGES
A. IN GENERAL
The Executive Judge and Presiding
Judge are Directed to assists and
support the Philippine Judicial
Academy in the organization ,
maintenance and operation of the
Philippine Mediation Center Units
B. SPECIFIC DUTIES/ROLES OF
EXECUTIVE JUDGES
1. Remind Presiding Judges to refer
cases for mediation office
2. Assists In providing a mediation
office
3. Designate a clerk in charge
4. Direct and ensure the collection
and deposit mediation fees
SPECIFIC DUTIES/ROLES OF
PRESIDING JUDGES
1. Extend the mediator assistance during
mediation proceedings
2. Refer mediatable cases to PMC
3. Direct his Branch Clerk to conduct a
Monthly Inventory of Mediatable cases
4. Monitor the case flow of cases being
mediated