Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Psychometric Quality
Norms
Reliability
Validity
1. Psychological constructs, states, & traits exist.
Description
Prediction
Diagnoses
DSM- 5/ICD-10
Criticisms of Diagnoses
Association with medical model
Variable reliability
Negative social stigma
Use of a diagnostic label to describe a human
being’s behavior or emotional problem implies
an understanding of the problem that is often
not there.
Psychological assessment
generates research hypotheses
Facilitate treatment planning
Evaluate treatment outcome
To make some prediction about a person’s future
behavior.
Prediction terms:
True positive
False positive
True negative
False negative
Sensitivity
Specificity
True positive ( prediction that a certain behavior
will occur and it does)
Specificity
▪ Is the probability that when a behavior is predicted not to
occur and it does not.
The Base Rate Problems
Low base rate problems are difficult to predict
Low base rate problems tend to be overpredicted
(many false positives)
Clinical (or subjective) method – clinician
constructs a model to explain client’s behavior
and predict future behavior
Clinician as data-gatherer
Stage I: Planning the Assessment
Communicate clearly
Intellectual assessment
Personality assessment
Behavioral assesment
The central role of clinicians conducting
assessments should be to answer specific
questions and aid in making relevant
decisions.
Development of neuropsychological
assessments and increasing use
Practical Considerations
1. If reading is required by the examinee, does his or her
ability match the level required by the test?
2. How appropriate is the length of the test?
Standardization
Is the population to be tested similar to the population
the test was standardized on?
Was the size of the standardization sample adequate?
Have specialized subgroup norms been established?
How adequately do the instructions permit
standardized administration?
Reliability
Are reliability estimates sufficiently high (generally around .90
for clinical decision making and around .70 for research
purposes)?
What implications do the relative stability of the trait, the
method of estimating reliability, and the test format have on
reliability?
Validity
What criteria and procedures were used to validate the test?
Will the test produce accurate measurements in the context and
for the purpose for which
you would like to use it?
Reliability
Test –retest reliability
Alternate forms
Split half reliability
Inter scorer reliability
Validity
Content Validity (Face validity)
Criterion related validity (Concurrent and face validity)
Construct Validity
A test can never be valid in any absolute sense because,
in practice, numerous variables might affect the test
results.
A serious issue, then, is the degree of validity
generalization that is made. This generalization
depends on the similarity between the population used
during various stages of test construction and the
population and situation that it is being used for in
practice.
Validity in clinical practice also depends on the extent
to which tests can work together to improve each
other’s accuracy.
Incremental validity: Some tests improve accuracy
with increasing numbers of data
conceptual validity: Another important
consideration is the ability of the clinician to
generate hypotheses, test these hypotheses, and
blend the data derived from hypothesis testing into
a coherent, integrated picture of the person.
Maloney and Ward (1976) refer this approach as
conceptual validity because it involves creating a
conceptually coherent description of the person.
Incremental Validity is used to determine if a new
psychological measure will provide more
information than measures that are already in
use. If a new test doesn't provide any new
information than the current, simpler measures are
already providing then the new test is unnecessary
and doesn't need to be used.