Well, we’re not entirely sure that there’s

only one universe. Are we?

THE MULTIVERSE THEORY EXPLAINED
 THE MULTIVERSE THEORY OPENS UP THE IDEA OF POSSIBLE
EXISTENCE OF DIFFERENT UNIVERSES WITH ALTERED PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
WHICH REFUTES THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT.

This could’ve
been you
INSTEAD OF SAYING IT IS MORE LIKELY THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE UNIVERSE,

COLLINS SUGGESTS, IT IS LEAST SURPRISING THAT THERE IS INDEED

ONLY ONE UNIVERSE SINCE WE CAN PROVE THAT “THIS” UNIVERSE EXIST
AND YET TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF OTHERS.
KEITH PARSONS

The notion of the fine-tuning of the

universe being probable or improbable
is meaningless.
(represents how bigger the improbability of a life
permitting universe would exist to just happen by chance)
 P(R|S)
ROBIN COLLINS’ ANSWER
CONDITIONAL EPISTEMIC
PROBABILITY

INDICATES
“GIVEN THAT”

EVENT THAT MAY OR EVENT THAT HAS

MAY NOT OCCUR ALREADY OCCURED
FINE-TUNING OF THE UNIVERSE
PERMITS LIFE
FINE-TUNING OF THE UNIVERSE
PERMITS LIFE
THERE IS ONLY
ONE UNIVERSE

THE DEGREE OF RATIONALLY BELIEVING THAT THE

CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY OF THE EXISTENCE OF LIFE
GIVEN THAT THIS UNIVERSE SUPPORTS IT.
EULER’S DIAGRAM
EULER’S DIAGRAM
THE CONDITIONS OF NSU DOES NOT ABSOLUTELY SUPPORT THE
CONDITIONSOF THE FINE-TUNED ARGUMENT

CEL PERMITTING
REGION
 THE DEGREE OF PROBABILITY IS HIGHER FOR THE
FINE-TUNED ARGUMENT THAN OF THE
NATURALISTIC SINGLE-UNIVERSE; UNTIL WE CAN ABSOLUTELY
GUARANTEE THAT NO OTHER UNIVERSE EXIST.
CONCLUSION

ROBIN COLLINS

From premises (1) and (2) and the likelihood principle, it

follows that the fine-tuning data provides significant
evidence to favor of the design hypothesis over the NSU.