Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
International Business
Gargi Sanati
Foreign Exchange Risk
Great Depression of ‘30s
Hypothesis of Fama
Why did Fama fail?
Country Risk
Contagion Effect
Efficient Market Hypothesis
• The efficient market hypothesis was pioneered by Eugene
Fama’s (1970)
– article “Efficient Capital Markets.”
– The premise is that investors react instantaneously to any
informational advantages they have, thereby eliminating
profit opportunities. Thus, prices always fully reflect the
information available and no profit can be made from
information based trading.
• It was generally believed that securities markets were
extremely efficient in reflecting information about individual
stocks and about the stock market as a whole.
• So no arbitrage opportunity prevails when market is efficient.
Fundamental and Technical Analysis
Fundamental Analysis: analysis of financial information such
as company earnings, asset values, money supplies, trade
balance etc.
Fundamental Approach to exchange rate forecasting uses various
models. For example, monetary approach to exchange rate model the
spot exchange rate to test the sensitivity to relative money supplies,
relative national outputs
Technical Analysis: study of past stock prices in an attempt to
predict future prices.
In exchange market, this method analyzes past behaviour of exchange
rates to identify patters and then projects them into the future to
generate forecasts. It sometimes consider various transactions data like
trading volume, interests and bid-ask spreads.
Efficient Market Hypothesis
• Fama (1970) stated that there are three versions of efficient
markets:
Weak-form: comprises of historical prices only (such as stock prices,
trading volume, and short interest), meaning that it is not possible to
earn superior risk adjusted profits which are based on past prices. This
leads to the random walk hypothesis. Hence, even the weak form of
the EMH implies that technical analysis can’t work, since technical
analysis relies exclusively on past trading data to forecast future price
movements.
14
12
10
0
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06
JAPAN UK
Country Risk_Gargi Sanati_NIBM US
Why did Fama Fail?
Conflict with Keynesian Theory?
1998 - Russia
2001 - Kosovo 2001/2002- 2001/2002 - Afghanistan
Middle East War on Terrorism
USA 1990 - ME war
2000/2001 - Turkey 2003 – N. Korea
1999 - Earthquake 2003 – Iraq war
1980s Iran/Iraq 1998 - India/Pakistan
Nuclear Test/Explosions
1995/96 - Mexico
1997 – Asia
2003 - SARS
Financial Crisis
Financial Integration – Are Developing Countries
prepared for?
Guidelines for CRM, 2004 indicates that banks should replace ratings
of Credit rating agencies and put in place internal assessment system
by 31 March 2005
Till banks move over to internal rating systems, they may use the 7
category classification followed by ECGC for the purpose of
classification and making provisions for country risk exposures.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
5
1975 1975
1976 1976
1977 1977
1978 1978
1979 1979
1980 1980
1981 1981
1982 1982
1983 1983
1984 1984
1985 1985
1986 1986
1987 1987
1988 1988
1989 1989
1990 1990
1991 1991
1992 1992
1993 1993
1994 1994
1995 1995
1996 1996
1997 1997
1998 1998
1999 1999
2000 2000
2001 2001
2002 2002
2006 2006
2007 2007
2008 2008
2009 2009
2010 2010
2011 2011
India-E
China-E
India-E
Brazil-E
China-E
Foreign trade as a percentage of GDP
35
30
25
20
%
Export/gdp
15 import /GDP
10
1990-2000 2000-2009
China 14.90858089 19.10211672
India 8.958908829 16.29810605
Brazil 5.783518161 12.01187765
UK 4.290123891 2.640459294
US 7.105431407 3.403338483
central and
Eastern Europe 5.384657878 15.39414011
Middle East &
North Africa 5.853969566 11.81324287
Emerging & Dev.
Economies 8.901047424 12.23108701
Developing Asia 12.6884828 13.83684587
advncd econ 5.580398037 7.657005718
Share of different countries and region in the world
export
14000
12000
10000
US $ Million
8000 Export
Import
6000
4000
2000
0
Foreign trade as a percentage of GDP
35
30
25
20
%
Export/gdp
15 import /GDP
10
0
Destination wise India’s Export to top 10 Countries
Partner 2006Partner 2007Partner 2008
USA 15.43346USA 13.79959USA 11.77115
United United United
Arab Arab Arab
Emirates 9.448428Emirates 9.902125Emirates 10.50063
China 6.459677China 6.505898China 5.550356
Singapore 5.055461Singapore 4.379817Singapore 4.868501
China,
United United Hong Kong
Kingdom 4.442081Kingdom 4.309114SAR 3.722925
China, China,
Hong Kong Hong Kong United
SAR 3.694922SAR 4.006218Kingdom 3.627784
Germany 3.177949Germany 3.239446Netherlands 3.589887
Italy 2.793851Netherlands 2.976736Germany 3.252574
Saudi
Belgium 2.744723Belgium 2.767394Arabia 2.955751
Japan 2.313701Italy 2.590678Belgium 2.59426
India’s Import: countries with top 10 share
Partner 2006Partner 2007Partner 2008
China 8.775517China 11.24002China 10.00469
USA 6.352799Saudi Arabia 7.578555USA 7.756158
Saudi Arabia 6.050688USA 6.497449Saudi Arabia 7.279683
United Arab United Arab
Switzerland 4.438654Emirates 5.352431Emirates 6.150948
United Arab
Emirates 4.212602Switzerland 4.865464Iran 4.368377
Germany 4.033093Iran 4.191985Switzerland 4.092405
Australia 3.648544Germany 4.017445Germany 3.616766
Iran 3.320787Australia 3.512968Kuwait 3.405368
Nigeria 3.188462Nigeria 3.209488Nigeria 3.206931
Singapore 2.909203Singapore 3.156531Australia 3.030908
Specialized Ranking Firms
The Economic 100 point Index - the 5 bands (A - lowest Political risk, Economic
Intelligence Unit (EIU): higher the score, riskier to E - highest) risk, Economic structure
London Based; 100 in the country risk, Liquidity risk
developing countries,
Quarterly basis
International Country Below 50 - very high risk Political risk, Economic
Risk Guide (ICRG) 50 - 59.9 - high risk risk, Financial risk
140 countries, Monthly 60 - 69.9 - moderate risk
Forecast on 1 year and 5 70-79.9 - low risk
years 80 - 100 - low risk
Nord Sud Export - 100 Sovereign financial risk,
developing countries, bi- financial market risk,
monthly political risk, business
environment risk
Business Environment Political Risk Index
Risk Intelligence (PRI), Operational Risk
(BERI) Index (ORI), Remittance
and repatriation factor
(R-factor), Composite
Score