FINAL PROJECT

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC

OFFLOAD DATA VIDEO STREAMING LTE TO
WLAN 802.11n
ANDREANA Y PRASETYA
1101120173

1st Advisor 2nd Advisor

Dr. Arfianto Fahmi, S.T., M.T. Uke Kurniawan Usman, Ir., MT.
NIP. 99750182-1 NIP. 94690125-4
OUTLINE
Introduction

Model System Design

Simulation Results

Conclusion
 INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND
Trend now days shows user high demand in data service of cellular
1 operator

2 LTE Subscriber increased significantly in every year

Cisco reported in 2015 the need of data traffic reach 26 times

3 higher than in 2010

In order for the traffic load remains stable and performance of

4 network capacity increased
INTRODUCTION

RELATED RESEARCH

In this Final Project, I test and modify

Thiagarajah, Silva Priya. And friend’s
research, titled “User Data Rate
Enhancement Using Heterogeneous LTE-
802.11n Offloading in Urban Area”
 INTRODUCTION

PROBLEMS

1 How the basic concept interworking of LTE network and WLAN network?

2 How to simulate traffic offload data from LTE to WLAN?

How the design of LTE network and WLAN network for the simulation so that the
3 traffic load remains stable and performance capacity network increase?

How the performance result for network based on the parameters? (RSRP,RSL,LTE
4 user, Offload user, WLAN user, Drop user, Cell Capacity, and Throughput)
 INTRODUCTION

PROBLEM BOUNDARIES
1 Using LTE release 8 and WLAN 802.11n technology

2 LTE 1800 Mhz and WLAN 2.4 GHz with 20 MHz bandwidth

3 Designs are limited in Radio Access Network side

4 The simulation does not consider the effect of interference between cells

5 User conditions scattered randomly on the scope of the research

Performance parameters analysis are RSRP, RSL, LTE user, Offload user, WLAN user, Drop user, Cell
6 Capacity, Throughput, and Distance
 INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVES

Knowing the received signal strength (RSRP on LTE and RSL on WLAN
1 802.11n) to do the offloading of the LTE network to WLAN networks in the
scope of the research area

This study is expected to explain the process Traffic Offload from the LTE
2 network to WLAN 802.11n and causes of offload data

Knowing the capacity and throughput of the network before and after the
3 offload data
 TRAFFIC OFFLOAD
 Traffic offload / data offloading is
use of network technology that is
complementary to provide data
access for mobile subscribers.
Another aim, to resolve and prevent
collisions on the cellular network.

 The purpose of architecture SIFM

defined in the Flow Controller (FC).
FC only carry out the functions of
mobility.

Interworking architecture with SIFM

 TRAFFIC OFFLOAD
Data Structures
Two main data structures are defined to support SIFM, as described
below: Binding Cache (BC) at the FC and Flow Table (FT) at the MA.
1) Binding Cache (BC): The binding cache (BC) is maintained at the FC
and contains the information about all the UEs and the MAs to which
they are attached to. Every BC entry contains:
・MN-ID: Identifies the Mobile Node uniquely.
・MA-ID: Identifies the Mobility Agent uniquely.
・MN-IP: IP Address of the Mobile Node within MA’s network.
・MA-IP: IP Address of the Mobility Agent. This is the tunnel address
which is used to communicate with other MAs.
・PORT-ID: Physical/Logical port on which the packets destined to
the MN are forwarded at the MA.
・STATUS: Status of the UE in a MA’s network.
2) Flow Table (FT): The Flow Table (FT) is maintained at the MAs and
reflects the flow decisions taken by the FC. Entries of the FT
determine the path taken by the flow received at the MA. Each FT
entry contains:
・Match-fields: Fields of the packet header to match against the
incoming packets. It might be an ingress port, source/destination
IP etc.
・Priority: Matching precedence of the flow entry.
・Counters: Updated when the packets are matched.
・Instructions: Actions to be performed by the MA on the packets
matched.
・Timeout: Idle time before a flow is expired by the switch.
SIFM architecture operation details
SYSTEM MODEL

SYSTEM MODEL
There are 3 design scenario in this Final Project
1. In this scenario modeling, 802.11n WLAN network cells
were thoroughly within scope of the LTE network cell.
2. In this scenario modeling, 802.11n WLAN network cell
overlaps with scope of the LTE network cell.
3. In this scenario modeling, 802.11n WLAN network cells
are outside scope of the LTE network cell.
 For Each Scenario
SYSTEM MODEL

FLOWCHART
Start *

Calculating Total LTE

User

For Overall
RSRPuser
Start Drop User No
RSRPmin

Analysis
Basic Identifikasi Kondisi Study of Yes
theory Trafik di Jaringan LTE literature
Observation Spread of
Conclusions &
User LTE
Suggestions
Scenario Simulation
Traffic Offload Data
from LTE network to
Observation Cells
Wi-Fi network Finish
Capacity LTE

Input Parameter ME calculating the

Simulation RSRP LTE and Cell
Capacity LTE

Received Signal Strength (RSS) : Cell Capacity LTE &

Number of Users Spread of User
RSRP (LTE) & RSL (Wi-Fi) Wi-Fi
RSRP < RSRPthreshold or
No Cell Capacity LTE Threshold
Cell Capacity LTE

Simulation Scenario
1/2/3 *

ME calculate RSL &

Capacity Wifi
Data Collection

Offloaded
LTE User Drop User Throughput
User RSL RSLthreshold & Cell
ME back to LTE Cell Capacity LTE <
Capacity WiFi < Threshold No No Drop User
Network Threshold Cell Capacity LTE
Cell Capacity WiFi

RSRP LTE < Threshold

RSL Wi-Fi > Threshold
or
Cell Capacity >= Threshold Cell
Tidak Yes Yes
Capacity
End of Simulation?
Offload from LTE to ME remain the LTE
Wi-Fi User

Ya

Finish
 For Each Scenario
SYSTEM MODEL

FLOWCHART
Start *

Calculating Total LTE

User

For Overall
RSRPuser
Start Drop User No
RSRPmin

Analysis
Basic Identifikasi Kondisi Study of Yes
theory Trafik di Jaringan LTE literature
Observation Spread of
Conclusions &
User LTE
Suggestions
Scenario Simulation
Traffic Offload Data
from LTE network to
Observation Cells
Wi-Fi network Finish
Capacity LTE

Input Parameter ME calculating the

Simulation RSRP LTE and Cell
Capacity LTE

Received Signal Strength (RSS) : Cell Capacity LTE &

Number of Users Spread of User
RSRP (LTE) & RSL (Wi-Fi) Wi-Fi
RSRP < RSRPthreshold or
No Cell Capacity LTE Threshold
Cell Capacity LTE

Simulation Scenario
1/2/3 *

ME calculate RSL &

Capacity Wifi
Data Collection

Offloaded
LTE User Drop User Throughput
User RSL RSLthreshold & Cell
ME back to LTE Cell Capacity LTE <
Capacity WiFi < Threshold No No Drop User
Network Threshold Cell Capacity LTE
Cell Capacity WiFi

RSRP LTE < Threshold

RSL Wi-Fi > Threshold
or
Cell Capacity >= Threshold Cell
Tidak Yes Yes
Capacity
End of Simulation?
Offload from LTE to ME remain the LTE
Wi-Fi User

Ya

Finish
 SYSTEM MODEL

Calculation LTE Network

Tabel 2.1 Service Model Parameter Capacity Planning Tabel 3.2 Cell Average Throughput
Service Model
Average SINR 1800 Mhz Distribution

Uplink Downlink UL DL
PPP PPP PPP PPP No Code Code SINR(min) SINR probability UL cell throughput UL cell throughput UL cell average DL cell throughput DL cell throughput DL cell average
Traffic Parameters Bearer Rate Bearer Rate Throughput/Session Throughput/Session Modulation
Session Session BLER Session Session BLER . bit rate (dB) (Pn) (bps) (Mbps) (Rn) throughput (Mbps) (bps) (Mbps) (Rn) throughput (Mbps)
(Kbps) (Kbps) (Kbps) (Kbps)
Times (s) Duty Ratio Times (s) Duty Ratio 1 QPSK 1/3 2 1/3 (-1,5 - 0,3) 0,28 38399976 38,4 10,8 31.999.976,00 32,0 9,0
VoIP 125 80 0,4 1% 125 80 0,4 1% 4.040,40 4.040,40 2 QPSK 1/2 2 1/2 (-0,3 - 2) 0,25 57599976 57,6 14,4 47.999.976,00 48,0 12,0
Video Phone 80,53 70 1 1% 1000 70 1 1% 5.694,04 70.707,07 3 QPSK 2/3 2 2/3 (2 - 4,5) 0,17 76799976 76,8 13,1 63.999.976,00 64,0 10,9
Video Conference 80,53 1.800 1 1% 500,53 1.800 1 1% 146.418,18 910.054,55 4 16 QAM 1/2 4 1/2 (4,5 - 6) 0,13 115199976 115,2 15,0 95.999.976,00 96,0 12,5
Real Time Gaming 62,58 1.800 0,2 1% 550,56 1.800 0,4 1% 22.756,36 400.407,27 5 16 QAM 2/3 4 2/3 (6- 8,5) 0,1 153599976 153,6 15,4 127.999.976,00 128,0 12,8
Streaming Media 130,26 1.800 0,05 1% 2000 1.800 0,05 1% 11.841,82 181.818,18 6 16 QAM 4/5 4 4/5 (8,5 - 10,8) 0,05 184319976 184,3 9,2 153.599.976,00 153,6 7,7
IMS Signalling 15,63 70 0,2 1% 15,63 7 0,2 1% 221,03 22,10 7 64 QAM 1/2 6 1/2 (10,8 - 12,5) 0,01 172799976 172,8 1,7 143.999.976,00 144,0 1,4
Web Browsing 100,53 1.800 0,05 1% 1000 1.800 0,05 1% 9.139,09 90.909,09
8 64 QAM 2/3 6 2/3 (12,5 - 13,5) 0,01 230399976 230,4 2,3 191.999.976,00 192,0 1,9
File Transfer 100,53 600 1 1% 1000 60 1 1% 60.927,27 60.606,06
Cell average throughput (MAC)= 81,8 68,2
Email 140,69 50 1 1% 750,34 15 1 1% 7.105,56 11.368,79
P2P File Sharing 250,11 1.200 1 1% 750,34 1.200 1 1% 303.163,64 909.503,03

Site Calculation :
1
𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢𝑡 = 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 × 𝑆𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 × 𝑆𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐷𝑢𝑡𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×
1−𝐵𝐿𝐸𝑅

𝑁𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢𝑡

Tabel 2.4 Traffic model for Various Environment Tabel 3.1 Single User Throughput in busy hour
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑖𝑡𝑒 =
Traffic Model for Various Environment
Peak to Average in
Single Service Throughput 𝑆𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
Environment
𝑆𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦

Traffic Parameters (Urban)

UL (Kbps) DL (Kbps) 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑆𝑖𝑡𝑒 = =

Urban
Peak to Average
VoIP 6303,0303 6303,030303
𝐷𝐿 𝑆𝑈𝑇
User Behaviour
Ratio
𝐷𝐿𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝐴𝑣𝑒∗3 68.2×3
Penetration
BHSA Urban
Video Phone
Video Conference
218,651152
3953,29091
2715,151515
24571,47273 = = 4410 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟
Ratio
Real Time Gaming 1092,30545 19219,54909
47.28×0.98 47.28×0.98
4410

VoIP 100% 1,3
Video Phone
Video Conference
20%
15%
0,16
0,15
Streaming Media
IMS Signalling
319,729091
318,283636
4909,090909
31,82836364 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 3 = 1470 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟
Web Browsing 4386,76364 43636,36364
 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = 2.51 𝐾𝑚2
Real Time Gaming 20% 0,2
Streaming Media 15% 0,15 File Transfer 2924,50909 2909,090909
20%
IMS Signalling 30% 4 Email 255,8 409,2763636
Web Browsing 100% 0,4 P2P File Sharing 21827,7818 65484,21818
𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒
File Transfer
Email
20%
10%
0,2
0,3
TOTAL
Single User
41600,1451 170189,072
 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠 = = 0.567269 𝐾𝑚
P2P File Sharing 20% 0,3 Throughput (Kbps)
11,5555959 47,27474222 2.6 𝑥 3

Σ 𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢 𝑡Τ𝑆 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 × 𝐵𝐻𝑆𝐴 × 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 × 1 + 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑡𝑜 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜

𝑆𝑈𝑇 =
3600
 SYSTEM MODEL

Calculation LTE Network

Coverage Planning
Tabel 3.3 Link Budget Downlink LTE
Maximum Allowable Path Loss (Downlink) Propagation Model & Coverage Area
Transmitter Value Calculation  f = 1800Mhz, hb = 30m, hr = 1.5m, Cm = 0
eNB TX power (dBm) 43 a
eNB gain (dBi) 18 b  𝑃𝐿 = 46.3 + 33.9 log 𝑓 − 13.82 log ℎ𝑏 − 𝑎 ℎ𝑟 +
Feeder loss (dB) 2 c
TMA insertion loss 0,5 d 44.9 − 6.55 log ℎ𝑏 log 𝑑 + 𝐶𝑚
EIRP 58,5 e=a+b-c-d

Receiver Value Calculation

 𝑎 ℎ𝑟 = 1.1 log 𝑓 − 0.7 ℎ𝑟 − (1.56 log 𝑓 − 0.8)
UE Noise figure (dB)
Thermal noise (dBm)
7
-174
f
g=k*T*B
 𝑑 = 0.5851894 𝐾𝑚
SINR (dB) -5 h
System bandwidth (dB) 72,5 i  𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = 3 × 2.6 × 𝑑 2 = 2.51𝐾𝑚2
Receiver sensitivity (dBm) -99,5 j=f+g+h+i
Interference margin (dB) 10 k
Fading margin (dB) 5 l
Penetration loss (dB) 12 m
Body loss (dB) 3 n
UE gain (dBi) 0 o
MAPL 128 p=e-j-k-l-m-n+o
 SYSTEM MODEL

Calculation WLAN Network

Coverage Planning
Capacity Planning Tabel 3.4 Offered Bit Quantity in Busy Hour Tabel 3.5 Link Budget Downlink WLAN 802.11n
Downlink Uplink
Service Bearer Duration Bearer Duration BHSA Penetration Downlink OBQ Uplink OBQ
Downlink
Rate time (s) Rate time (s)
VoIP 125,00 200 125,00 200 2,1 100% 52500,0 52500,0
Parameter Value Unit
Video Phone 1.000,00 70 80,53 70 0,5 60% 21000,0 1691,1 Tx power AP (Pt) 20 dBm
Video Conference 500,53 1.800 62,53 1.800 0,4 60% 216229,0 27013,0
Real Time Gaming 550,06 1.800 130,26 1.800 1,4 30% 415845,4 98476,6 Antenna gain AP (Gt) 4 dBi
Streaming Media 2.000,00 1.800 31,26 1.800 3,2 50% 5760000,0 90028,8
IMS Signalling 15,63 50 15,63 50 5 40% 1563,0 1563,0 Cable losses AP (Lt) 2 dB
Web Browsing/Mobile Application 1.000,00 2.700 100,53 2.700 3,8 100% 10260000,0 1031437,8
File Transfer 1.000,00 600 100,53 600 0,5 50% 150000,0 15079,5
Antenna gain client (Gr) 0 dBi
Email 750,34 15 140,69 50 0,6 70% 4727,1 2954,5 Cable losses client (Lr) 2 dB
P2P File Sharing 2.000,00 1.200 250,11 1.200 0,8 30% 576000,0 72031,7
Total Kbit/Hour 17457864,5 1392775,9 Expected received signal level (Pr) -90 dBm
Total Kbit 4849,4 386,9
OBQ Total 5236,3 MAPL 110 dBm
Propagation Model & Coverage Area
Cell Capacity WLAN 802.11n 𝑛𝑓 +2
𝑂𝐵𝑄𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 −𝑏
 𝐿 𝑇 = 𝐿𝐹𝑆𝐿 + 𝐿𝐶 + σ𝑀 𝑖=1 𝑛𝑤𝑖 𝐿𝑤𝑖 + 𝑛𝑓
𝑛𝑓 +1
𝐿𝑓 [14]
 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝑃 = 1000 [14]
𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘𝐷𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑓𝐴𝑃  𝐿𝐹𝑆𝐿 = 20 log 𝑓 + 20 log 𝑑 + 32.5
 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘𝐷𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑓𝐴𝑃 = 144.4 𝑀𝑏𝑝𝑠 [6]  f = Frek carrier, nf = Latai ke-, nwi = jumlah dinding, Lwi =
𝑂𝐵𝑄𝑢𝑙+𝑂𝐵𝑄𝑑𝑙
 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑟 = 𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘𝐷𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑓𝐴𝑃/( = 27 𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑠 tipe dinding loss,
1000
Lf = Loss per lantai, b = Parameter empirik
 𝑓 = 2400, 𝑛𝑤𝑖𝐿𝑤𝑖 = 15, 𝑛𝑓 = 1, 𝐿𝑓 = 15𝑑𝐵, 𝑏 = 0.46
 𝑑 = 0.0784853787287418 𝐾𝑚
SYSTEM MODEL

Parameter Input
Tabel Parameter input simulasi
LTE WLAN 1 WLAN 2 WLAN 3
Parameter
Nilai
Radius Sel (m) 567.37 78.49
Pusat koordinat (x,y)(m) (567,37|567,37) (990,76|811,81) (851,06|1.058,7) (567,37|1.213,2)
Power antenna (dBm) 43 20
Gain antenna Tx (dBi) 18 4
Gain antenna Rx (dBi) 0 0
RSS Treshold Minimal (dBm) -94,1|-96,76|-99,02 -90
Frekuensi (MHz) 1800 2400
Kapasitas Sel 1470 27
Jumlah User 735
Tabel MCS Indeks
Physical
Physical
Receive Receive datarate
datarate
MCS Index sensitivity MCS Index sensitivity (Mbps)
(Mbps) LTE
(dBm) (dBm) 802.11n
(20MHz)
(20MHz)
MCS1 -96 32 MCS8 -90 14.4
MCS2 -94.2 48 MCS9 -90 28.9
MCS3 -92.5 64 MCS10 -89 43.3
MCS4 -90 96 MCS11 -86 57.8
MCS5 -88.5 128 MCS12 -82 86.7
MCS6 -86 154 MCS13 -78 115.6
MCS7 -83.7 144 MCS14 -77 130
MCS8 -82 192 MCS15 -75 144.4
SIMULATION RESULT

User Distribution
 Distribution of User : Random

 Total User : 735 users

SIMULATION RESULT
Analysis of RSRP (LTE) and RSL (WLAN 802.11n) to the distance

Description:
RSRP threshold &RSL threshold

RSRP: -94.1 dBm

RSL:-87.9 dBm
RSRP: -96.75 dBm
RSL:-88.1 dBm
RSRP: -99.01 dBm
RSL:-88.1dBm
SIMULATION RESULT
Analysis of LTE User, Offload User, Wi-Fi User, dan Drop User

Graph of LTE user, Offload user, Wi-Fi user, and Drop user.
 SIMULATION RESULT
Analysis of Capacity and Throughput

Graph of average capacity per user Graph of Capacity Cells of LTE Before and After Offload
Average LTE System
RSRPmin RSLmin LTE Offload WLAN Drop Enhancement Enhancement
Scenario Capacity per Capacity
dBm dBm user User user user C_Ave C_LTE
user (Mbps) (Mbps)
0 0 0 631 0 0 104 0.1066 0% 67.2786 0%
1 -94.1 613 18 18 104 0.1134 6.38% 69.5294 3.34%
2 -96.7 -90 620 11 19 96 0.1107 3.80% 68.6208 1.99%
3 -99.02 631 0 13 91 0.1066 0% 67.2786 0%
 CONCLUSION

• Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) in LTE and Received Signal Level (RSL) in
Wi-Fi are used as the main reference in which the user can be served by a network.
Of the various factors can affect the quality of a signal received by the user. Such
as, loss canal, noise figure, interference, fading, penetration loss, and also the
distance.

• Scenario 1
Traffic offload data from the network to the LTE network WLAN 802.11n has
RSRPthres= -94.01 dBm and RSLthres = -90 dBm. From the simulation results obtained
as many as 613 LTE user, offload user as many as 18 users, WLAN 802.11n user as
many as 18 users, and drop user as many as 104 user of the total 735 users. The
average capacity per user increased by 6.38% to 0.113425 Mbps with a total of 18 user
offload and LTE system capacity increased to 69.52943 Mbps. In other words, the total
capacity offload of LTE system amounted to 2.25083 Mbps (3.34%). In addition, there is
an increase in throughput per user for MCS1 of 12.41% to 0.220689 Mbps, due to
offload user 18 previously located in MCS1 (LTE) network switch to WLAN 802.11n.
 CONCLUSION
• Scenario 2
Traffic offload data from the network to the LTE network WLAN 802.11n has RSRPthres
= -96.75 dBm and RSLthres = -90 dBm. From the simulation results obtained as many
as 620 LTE user, offload user as many as 11 users, WLAN 802.11n user as many as 19
users, and drop user as many as 96 of the total 735 users. The average capacity per
user increased by 3.8% to 0.110679 Mbps with a total of 11 user offload and LTE
system capacity increased to 68.6208 Mbps. In other words, the total capacity offload
of LTE system amounted to 1.342205 Mbps (1.99%). In addition, there is an increase in
throughput per user for MCS1 of 7.24% to 0.210526 Mbps, due to offload user 11
previously located in MCS1 (LTE) network switch to WLAN 802.11n.

• Scenario 3
Traffic offload data from the network to the LTE network WLAN 802.11n has RSRPthres
= -99.02 dBm and RSLthres = -90 dBm. From the simulation results obtained as many
as 631 LTE user, offload user as many as 0 users, WLAN 802.11n user as many as 13
users, and drop user as many as 91 of the total 735 users. From the results of scenario
3 the average capacity per user, LTE system capacity, and throughput user does not
have an increase, in the absence of the user who experience offload. With a research
note this reference each user using the same parameters (RE allocation, type of
service, QoS, access time, and priority).
 CONCLUSION

• If the operator wants to decrease the traffic load significantly scenario 1 is the
choice, whereas if the operator wants to optimize coverage holes with OPEX and
CAPEX lower than the femtocell scenario 3 is the choice.

• With traffic offload data from LTE network to WLAN 802.11n network could be a
solution for the operator, because can increase network capacity, improve user
throughput, avoid congestion on the network, which ultimately enhance the user
experience.
Thank you