Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • BM Reporting Template

    Transféré par

    Jamel Siagian
    89 vues6 pages
    The document summarizes the results of a drive test comparing the performance of an operator's mobile network (OML) to that of a competitor (TML) in the Botahtaung area. Key findings include: - OML had better voice call success rates and data throughput speeds than TML, positioning it first, but had lower 4G data throughput, positioning it third. - OML showed improvements in areas like data speeds, latency and voice call setup times from optimization work like capacity expansion and protocol changes. - OML's 4G coverage and signal strengths were better than TML's, but its signal interference levels were lower, affecting data performance during busy hours.

    Description originale:

    BM Reporting Template

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    PPTX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    The document summarizes the results of a drive test comparing the performance of an operator's mobile network (OML) to that of a competitor (TML) in the Botahtaung area. Key findings include: - OML had better voice call success rates and data throughput speeds than TML, positioning it first, but had lower 4G data throughput, positioning it third. - OML showed improvements in areas like data speeds, latency and voice call setup times from optimization work like capacity expansion and protocol changes. - OML's 4G coverage and signal strengths were better than TML's, but its signal interference levels were lower, affecting data performance during busy hours.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PPTX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    89 vues6 pages

    BM Reporting Template

    Transféré par

    Jamel Siagian
    The document summarizes the results of a drive test comparing the performance of an operator's mobile network (OML) to that of a competitor (TML) in the Botahtaung area. Key findings include: - OML had better voice call success rates and data throughput speeds than TML, positioning it first, but had lower 4G data throughput, positioning it third. - OML showed improvements in areas like data speeds, latency and voice call setup times from optimization work like capacity expansion and protocol changes. - OML's 4G coverage and signal strengths were better than TML's, but its signal interference levels were lower, affecting data performance during busy hours.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PPTX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 6

    Summary – Cluster Name

    Summary of KPI’s & OML Positioning


    Drive Test Details:
    Day: Botahtaung KPIs (Voice & Data)
    Type KPI OML TML OM Position
    Time: Call Attempts (#) 40 33
    Tool Used: Voice CSSR (%) 100 100 First
    DT Engineer Name: DCR (%) 0 0 First
    Contact Number: Data
    Data Throughput (Mbps) 3G 4.90 8.43 Second
    Data Throughput (Mbps) 4G 9.54 11.26 Third
    OML TML

    No of sites 8 12

    Notes from DT: Please fill in if any issues observed like outage or test kit issues.

    1
    Botahtaung – Coverage
    RSRP (%)
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    Max-89 40.82 66.45
    4G Coverage

    89-96 28.31 18,87


    96-108 27.81 9.34
    108-114 2.51 1.75
    114 - Min 0.53 3.58
    Average -90.82 -86.14

    RSCP (%)
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    3G Coverage

    0-76 74.39 47.22


    76-85 16.97 31.54
    85-91 3.87 10.13
    91-100 4.71 9.30
    100- Min 0.05 1.77
    Average -67.82 -77.25

    2
    Botahtaung – Quality
    SINR (%)
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    Max-89 40.82 66.45
    4G Quality

    89-96 28.31 18,87


    96-108 27.81 9.34
    108-114 2.51 1.75
    114 - Min 0.53 3.58
    Average -90.82 -86.14

    OML TML

    No of sites ** 8 12
    ** No of sites calculation for MPT & TML
    = Total PCI considering separation

    EcNo (%) - UE
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    3G Quality

    0-76 74.39 47.22


    76-85 16.97 31.54
    85-91 3.87 10.13
    91-100 4.71 9.30
    100- Min 0.05 1.77
    Average -67.82 -77.25

    3
    Botahtaung – Throughput
    Throughput (%)
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    4G Throughput

    Max-89 40.82 66.45


    89-96 28.31 18,87
    96-108 27.81 9.34
    108-114 2.51 1.75
    114 - Min 0.53 3.58
    Average -90.82 -86.14

    OML MPT TML

    No of sites ** 8 8 12
    ** No of sites calculation for MPT & TML
    = Total PCI considering separation

    Throughput (%)
    3G Throughput

    Range (dBm) OML TML


    0-76 74.39 47.22
    76-85 16.97 31.54
    85-91 3.87 10.13
    91-100 4.71 9.30
    100- Min 0.05 1.77
    Average -67.82 -77.25

    4
    Botahtaung – MOS
    MOS(%)
    Range (dBm) OML TML
    Max-89 40.82 66.45
    89-96 28.31 18,87
    3G MOS

    96-108 27.81 9.34


    108-114 2.51 1.75
    114 - Min 0.53 3.58
    Average -90.82 -86.14

    OML MPT TML

    No of sites ** 8 8 12

    5
    Botahtaung – KPI’s

    MS Info OML
    Type KPI OML Pre OML TML Remarks
    OML TML Position
    Call Attempt(#) MS1 MS4 47 64 54
    CSSR 3G (%) MS1 MS4 100 100 100
    CSSR 4G (%) MS7 MS10
    DCR(%) MS1 MS4 0 0 0
    Voice
    Call Set Up Time (CSFB to
    MS7 MS10 5.89 3.16 5.28 Improved
    3G) Early ACM, RAU Delay, CSFB with PSHO
    AMR WB CODEC (%) MS7 MS10 97.65 99.6 0
    POLQA NB SCORES
    MS7 MS10 3.65 3.77 4.03
    DL(MOC)
    Avg. DL Throughput(Mbps)
    MS3 MS6 3.89 6.38 4.38 Improved
    3G Capacity Expansion and L1 clean up
    Avg. DL Throughput(Mbps)
    Data MS9 MS12 9.5 11.79 15.43 Improved
    4G 4X4 MIMO activation and L1 clean up
    Avg.Ping(ms) 3G MS3 MS6 231 132.35 174 Improved TrafvolULThresholdLow changed from 512 to 128
    Avg.Ping(ms) 4G MS9 MS12 108 107.25 115
    Avg RSRP (4G Data) MS9 MS12 -81.18 -80.99 -89.33 Coverage is better for OML
    SINR for OML is low in Busy Hours - Traffic Load
    Avg SINR (4G Data) MS9 MS12 6.69 7.15 9.24
    Radio contribution.
    Avg RSCP (3G Data) MS1 MS4 -68.88 -69.4 -76.84
    Avg EcNo (3G Data) MS1 MS4 -9.57 -5.67 -9.28
    % U900 (3G Data) MS1 MS4 24.98 27.79 0
    Band
    % U2100 (3G Data) MS1 MS4 75.02 72.21 100
    PRB allocation downlink is less than competetion - links to
    PRB (DL)% MS9 MS12 65.16 59.25 85.52
    PRB (%) load
    PRB (UL)% MS9 MS12 36.4 47.74 66.74 PRB allocation uplink is less than competetion - link to load
    4G Serving cell (unique PCI) MS9 MS12 40 45 53
    Cells
    3G Serving cell (unique PSC) MS1 MS4 44 49 63
    6

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi