0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
7 vues8 pages
The document summarizes Article XIV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution regarding education, science, technology, arts, culture and sports. It discusses the state's duty to promote quality, accessible education for all citizens. It also outlines the natural and primary rights of parents regarding the upbringing and education of their children. These include the right to choose schools and direct the religious education of their children. The document then discusses how the state can regulate access to education to ensure quality while respecting students' constitutional rights to assembly and free speech. Institutions have obligations to provide fair opportunities for students but can dismiss those who breach discipline or fail to meet academic standards.
The document summarizes Article XIV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution regarding education, science, technology, arts, culture and sports. It discusses the state's duty to promote quality, accessible education for all citizens. It also outlines the natural and primary rights of parents regarding the upbringing and education of their children. These include the right to choose schools and direct the religious education of their children. The document then discusses how the state can regulate access to education to ensure quality while respecting students' constitutional rights to assembly and free speech. Institutions have obligations to provide fair opportunities for students but can dismiss those who breach discipline or fail to meet academic standards.
The document summarizes Article XIV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution regarding education, science, technology, arts, culture and sports. It discusses the state's duty to promote quality, accessible education for all citizens. It also outlines the natural and primary rights of parents regarding the upbringing and education of their children. These include the right to choose schools and direct the religious education of their children. The document then discusses how the state can regulate access to education to ensure quality while respecting students' constitutional rights to assembly and free speech. Institutions have obligations to provide fair opportunities for students but can dismiss those who breach discipline or fail to meet academic standards.
and Sports ARTICLE XIV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution: Sections 1-5 Section 1: The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all. THE 3 PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM WHICH THE STATE MUST PROMOTE AND PROTECT A.) QUALITY OF EDUCATION; B.) AFFORDABLE EDUCTAION; C.) EDUCATION THAT IS RELEVANT TO THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE AND SOCIETY. NATURAL AND PRIMARY RIGHTS OF PARENTS: 1.) The right of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390), which includes the: The natural duty of the parent to give his children education suitable to their station in life. (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390) The right of the parents to choose the person who will instruct their children. (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390) NATURAL AND PRIMARY RIGHTS OF PARENTS: The right of parents to choose schools where their children will receive appropriate mental and religious training. (Pierce v. Society of Sisters 262 US 510) The right and duty of the parents to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. (Pierce v. Society of Sisters 262 US 510) NATURAL AND PRIMARY RIGHTS OF PARENTS: The parents have traditional interest with respect to the religious upbringing of their children, thus they have the right to direct their religious upbringing. (Wisconsin v. Yoder 406 US 205) the parents' right to claim to authority in their own household to direct the rearing of their children. (Ginsberg v. New York 406 US 629) The primary right of the parent to the custody, care and nurture of the child, this would include the preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder. (Ginsberg v. New York 406 US 629) QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM: The State can employ methods which will regulate the access to medical schools and insulate the medical schools and ultimately the medical profession from the intrusion of those not qualified to be doctors. (DECS V. San Diego 180 SCRA 534) QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM: “The academic freedom enjoyed by “institutions of higher learning” includes the right to set academic standards to determine under what circumstances failing grades suffice for the expulsion of students. Once it has done so, however, that standard should be followed meticulously. It cannot be utilized to discriminate against those students who exercise their constitutional rights to peaceable assembly and free speech.” (Non V. Judge Dame 185 SCRA 523) QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM: “An institution of learning has a contractual obligation to afford its students a fair opportunity to complete the course they seek to pursue. However, when a student commits a serious breach of discipline or fails to maintain the required academic standard, he forfeits his contractual right; and the court should not review the discretion of university authorities.” (Non V. Judge Dame 185 SCRA 523)
Ray Crocker Susan Crocker, as Legal Guardians and Next Friends of Michael Crocker v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, (88-6063) Charles Smith, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Education Metro Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee, (88-6185), 873 F.2d 933, 2d Cir. (1989)