1.

Accessibility Analysis
a. RRC Analysis LPZ

RRC SUCCESS RATE

Formula and Counters used

Root Folder

Stats taken during busy hour (15:00 – 20:00) of the week specified.
RRC Scenario Analysis
RRC Distribution in each scenario

Root Folder
RRC Scenario Analysis
Root Folder
RRC Distribution in each scenario

For Org and Trm formula, please

Refer to the RRC Success Rate
Formula, separate all counters with
Org and Trm Att and Succ then
Calculate the ratio x 100. For Reg and
IRATCelRes, there are counters for Att
And Succ for this, just calculate the ratio.
(Succ/Att)*100.

RRC Success Rate for terminating are good which is above 99%, while the rest are normal.
IRAT Cell Reselection RRC TopN Cell Analysis

Root Folder
Sum of
RRC.AttConnEstab.IR
RNC:Operator CellName:CellID ATCelRes
70:TIGO PERB:27004 49860
70:TIGO VADC:37021 33630
70:TIGO VNPB:27150 27442
70:TIGO PERC:37004 27256
Graph shows the relationship of top 10 cells vs all cells 70:TIGO MIRB:27169 24632
on IRAT cell reselection RRC attempts. 35.22% are being
70:TIGO REY_C:37066 23699
occupied by the top 10 cells of the time of all cells. Cells
included on the top 10 lists can be Optimized by adjusting 70:TIGO VTNB:27237 22961
a parameter related to IRAT cell reselection. 70:TIGO ILLA:17030 22204
70:TIGO UYUA:17012 19581
70:TIGO VSAA:17148 18678
RRC Registration TopN Cell Analysis

Root Folder

Sum of
RNC:Operator CellName:CellID RRC.AttConnEstab.Reg
70:TIGO VADC:37021 4700
70:TIGO ORU1A:17038 3809
70:TIGO VADB:27021 3222
70:TIGO FLOC:37002 2652
Graph shows the relationship of top 10 cells vs all cells 70:TIGO VADA:17021 2265
on Registration RRC attempts. 13.56% are being occupied
70:TIGO ORU1B:27038 2191
by the top 10 cells of the time of all cells.
70:TIGO CEMA:17026 2137
70:TIGO ACHA:17013 2112
70:TIGO MARB:27018 2004
70:TIGO FATC:37016 1994
RRC Fail TopN Cell Analysis

Root Folder

Sum of
Sum of Sum of VS.RRC.A RRC
RNC:Opera CellName:CellI RRC.FailConnEs VS.RRC.FailC ttConnEsta Success
tor D tab.NoReply onnEstab b.Cell Rate
70:TIGO VADC:37021 260 2032 57349 96.22%
70:TIGO VADB:27021 73 731 17941 96.69%

Graph shows the relationship of top 10 70:TIGO VADA:17021 154 484 12841 95.80%
cells vs all cells on RRC fail to connect 70:TIGO FATC:37016 133 220 15426 98.26%
(with reason, no response or no reply)
70:TIGO FATA:17016 158 206 14068 98.13%
25.4% are being occupied by the top
10 cells of the time of all cells. 70:TIGO REY_C:37066 134 197 35613 99.12%
70:TIGO FATB:27016 92 186 11413 98.36%
70:TIGO VSAA:17148 144 181 27703 98.91%
70:TIGO REY_A:17066 110 84 12890 98.68%
70:TIGO VTNB:27237 267 68 35041 99.06%
b. RAB Analysis
RAB Scenario Analysis

Graph Shows RAB attempts in different services during busy hour (15:00 – 20:00). PS and HSDPA occupies more
RAB attempts than CS (AMR and VP).
RAB Success Rate Analysis

CS, PS & HSDPA RAB Att and Succ counters are located here

RAB Success Rate for AMR, PS and HSDPA are way above the target KPI. VP assignment Success Rate is low
since there are only few attempt establishments.
2. Mobility Analysis
c. Inter-RAT HO Analysis (CS and PS)
IRAT-HO for CS and PS
CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate
PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate

IRAT-HO for CS and PS

PS IRAT-HO Fail Top 10 Cell Analysis

Sum of Sum of
IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.P Sum of Average of IRATHO Success
CellName:CellID .CfgUnsupp hyChFail IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN Rate PS
AIRP_A:17075 0 215 6 80.85%
HRBA:17241 0 55 2 91.74%
HRBB:27241 0 26 0 96.30%
CLTA:17269 0 16 0 94.12%
CSTB:27001 0 1 7 100.00%
VICC:37009 0 1 0 50.00%

inter-RAT handover failure is caused by Physical Channel Failure (cause value). PS inter-
RAT handover failure is mainly caused by: The signals of 2G network are weak or UE fails
to access the network due to interference. Some parameters (such as ciphering mode)
transmitted to UE are inconsistent with that of BSC. To locate the problem, compare the
parameters of NodeB with that of BSC.
b. SHO Analysis

SHO and SoHO counters are located here

SHO Success rate is more than 99% which is excellent.

SoHO Analysis

SHO and SoHO counters are located here

SoHO Success rate is more than 99% which is excellent.

SHO Factor

SHO Factor counters are located here

SHO Factor rate is 44% which exceeds the limit of 40%.

3. Retainability Analysis
a. Call Drop Rate Analysis

Call Drop rates for different services (AMR12.2, VP, PS and HSDPA) are all within the KPI Target
AMR Call Drop Rate TopN Cell Analysis

Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of

Average VS.RAB.L VS.RAB.Lo VS.RAB.Los Sum of VS.RAB.Lo VS.RAB.Loss.C VS.RAB.Los
CellName:Ce of AMR oss.CS.A ss.CS.Conv s.CS.Aal2Lo VS.RAB.Loss. ss.CS.RF.O S.RF.UuNoRep s.CS.RF.ULS
llID Drop Rate MR 64K ss CS.SRBReset th ly ync

SENB:27065 0.76% 17 0 0 6 0 1 10

CEJA:17024 1.55% 15 0 0 13 0 1 1

FLOC:37002 0.20% 14 0 0 9 0 5 0

CSTB:27001 0.56% 11 0 0 8 0 3 0

HRBC:37241 0.68% 11 0 0 10 0 0 1

MRDB:27031 0.86% 11 0 0 11 0 0 0

CLTC:37269 0.52% 10 0 0 10 0 0 0

VICC:37009 0.20% 10 0 0 8 0 0 2

C6AA:17239 0.40% 9 0 0 7 0 1 1

PPCA:17143 3.10% 9 0 0 4 0 2 4

Top N cells usual reason for AMR dropped calls are due to Signaling Radio Link Control,
UL synchronization loss and few loss on Uu NoReply. Coverage might be the reason and neighbor relation and RF
Optimization needs to check.
VP Call Drop Rate TopN Cell Analysis

Averag Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of

e of VP VS.RAB.Los Sum of Sum of VS.RAB.Los VS.RAB.Lo VS.RAB.Loss. VS.RAB.L
CellName:Cell Drop s.CS.Conv64 VS.RAB.Loss. VS.RAB.Loss. s.CS.SRBRe ss.CS.RF.O CS.RF.UuNo oss.CS.RF
ID Rate K CS.AMR CS.Aal2Loss set th Reply .ULSync

ORU1A:17038 11.11% 1 6 0 5 0 0 2

Few traffic for Video Call

PS Call Drop Rate TopN Cell Analysis

Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of

Average of VS.RAB.L Sum of VS.RAB.Lo VS.RAB.Los VS.RAB.Los Sum of Sum of
CellName:Cell PS Drop oss.PS.G VS.RAB.L ss.PS.RF.O s.PS.RF.ULS s.PS.RF.Uu VS.RAB.Loss. VS.RAB.Loss.
ID Rate TPULoss oss.PS.RF th ync NoReply PS.SRBReset PS.TRBReset

DBOB:27112 3.74% 10 140 0 3 0 3 134

ORU1A:17038 0.83% 63 91 10 46 2 25 8

VADC:37021 1.31% 59 84 1 65 5 11 2

CEJB:27024 1.43% 21 76 12 22 5 17 20

SEGB:27090 1.58% 9 74 0 43 6 10 15

PERB:27004 0.76% 11 69 5 17 5 11 31

VSAC:37148 1.34% 28 68 3 19 6 17 23

CSTB:27001 0.79% 17 62 8 26 4 12 12

VSAA:17148 1.20% 15 60 0 20 1 11 28

MARB:27018 1.02% 32 56 5 21 1 23 6

Most of the cause of dropped calls for Top N cells for PS are due to release of traffic and signaling Radio Link Control,
UL synchronization loss and few loss on Uu NoReply. Coverage might be the reason as well as neighbor relation,
RF Optimization needs to check.
HSDPA Call Drop Rate TopN Cell Analysis

Average of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of

CellName:CellI HSDPA VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss VS.HSDPA.RAB. VS.HSDPA.RAB.Loss VS.HSDPA.RA VS.HSDPA.RAB.
D Drop Rate .InActivity Loss.RF .Abnorm.NonRF B.AttEstab SuccEstab

DBOB:27112 0.60% 1549 140 12 2056 2046

ORU1A:17038 0.18% 17182 95 65 19947 19826

VADC:37021 0.34% 10222 85 59 13796 10871

CEJB:27024 0.24% 6666 74 23 7479 7459

PERB:27004 0.12% 9143 73 11 10383 10362

SEGB:27090 0.09% 4967 72 11 5605 5605

VSAC:37148 0.34% 7105 64 29 8301 8037

VSAA:17148 0.11% 5717 62 15 6512 6280

CSTB:27001 0.14% 9842 58 17 10625 10618

MARB:27018 0.21% 8338 56 31 9643 9633

Mean SPU Load Analysis

Graph shows SPU loading for the whole day of May 12. SPU loading are below
35% at all times, considered normal.
Mean DPU Load Analysis

Graph shows DPU loading for the whole day of May 12. Average of mean DPU loading is 13% at all times,
considered normal.
DL CE Utilization
DL CE Utilization TopN

Average of DL CE Utilization Rate

NodeBName Max of VS.LC.DLCreditAvailable.Shared (Mean) Average of DL CE Utilization Rate (Max)

MAR 256 15.93% 28.91%

JUL 256 2.66% 28.91%

AAC 256 9.76% 28.91%

ABR 256 8.13% 28.91%

ACH 256 15.81% 28.91%

ACO 256 9.51% 28.91%

AIRP 256 5.86% 28.91%

ALT 256 4.06% 28.91%

AOB 256 13.94% 28.91%

ARA 256 3.16% 28.91%

Top 10 list of Node B’s with most DL CE utilization. Maximum average of 15.93% is considered low utilization.
UL CE Utilization
UL CE Utilization TopN

Max of Average of UL CE Utilization Rate Average of UL CE Utilization Rate

NodeBName VS.LC.ULCreditAvailable.Shared (Mean) (Max)

VAD 192 89.60% 99.13%

VSA 192 80.27% 97.69%

VTN 192 76.33% 93.87%

FAT 192 74.39% 92.60%

REY 192 71.32% 89.57%

EDU 192 64.10% 83.17%

LBT 192 61.62% 78.60%

C6A 192 60.80% 82.18%

MAR 192 59.83% 76.79%

ACH 192 59.73% 78.63%

Top 10 list of Node B’s with most DL CE utilization. Maximum average of 89.60% is considered high. In this case,
NodeB VAD has the highest utilization while the rest are on the average. Needs to be upgraded.
RTWP
RTWP Top N Cells

CellName Average of VS.MinRTWP Average of VS.MeanRTWP Average of VS.MaxRTWP

CEJB -89.21282051 -88.11758974 -80.92820513

PPCB -90.94102564 -89.66335897 -85.41794872

DBOA -91.58205128 -90.68187179 -85.45128205

MARB -92.47692308 -91.34892308 -82.21794872

BUEA -93.44871795 -92.5995641 -82.37692308

ABRB -94.37948718 -92.60184615 -85.27179487

CSTC -95.47948718 -94.07138462 -85.69230769

CEJA -98.14102564 -94.88135897 -85.55128205

FEJB -95.92051282 -95.02264103 -89.15384615

VREA -96.77435897 -95.77128205 -91.17692308

Cells exceeds -95dBm means that

there’s a possible uplink interference