Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 28
Design with Brittle Ceramics 1
Ref: Barsoum, Fundamentals of Ceramics, Ch11, McGraw Hill, 2000;
Richerson, Modern Ceramic Engineering, Ch15, Marcel Dekker, 1992
Topics to discuss....
s s
Frequency
margin
of safety
Strength Strength
Ps (V0 V ) – Ps (V0 ) V
– R(s )
Ps (V0 ) V0
dPs (V ) dV
= – R(s)
Ps (V ) V0
dPs (V ) dV
= – R(s)
Ps (V ) V0
æ s – s c öm
R(s) = ç ÷
è sv ø
é æ s – s c öm V ù
Ps (V ) = exp ê– ç ÷ ú
êë è s v ø V0 úû
é æ s öm V ù
Pf = 1 – Ps = 1 – exp ê– ç ÷ ú
êë è s v ø V0 úû
é æ s öm V ù
P f = 1 – exp ê – ç ÷ ú
êë è s v ø V0 úû
é æ s öm ù æV0 ö1/m
Pf = 1 – exp ê – ç ÷ ú ; s0 = sv ç ÷
êë è s 0 ø úû èV ø
Pf Pf
1 1
m=
m=1
0 s 0 s
s0
The Weibull modulus, m, also defines the width of the
probability distribution.
Large m narrow distribution, small scatter in strength data, high reliability material
Small m wide distribution, large scatter in strength data, poor reliability material
Pf Pf
1 1
large m small m
0 s 0 s
é æ s öm ù
Pf = 1 – exp ê – ç ÷ ú
êë è s 0 ø úû
m
æsö ln (– ln (1–Pf))
ln (1 – P f ) = – ç ÷
è s0 ø
ln [ – ln (1 – P f )] slope = m
= m ln s – m lns 0
c = – m ln s0
ln [ – ln Ps ] = m lns – m lns 0 ln s
Problem
A series of square section bars are tested in 3-point bend test. Determine
(1) the Weibull modulus, m
(2) the median strength, sm (for which Pf = 0.5), and
(3) the normalised stress (s0) of the ceramic.
The failure strengths (MOR) data: 178, 318, 345, 210, 296, 235, 248, 276, 262.
Solution:
1. Rank all stress data (n) in ascending order and numbered.
2. Calculate the failure probability Pf of each data as:
Pf = (1– Ps) = n / (N+1)
where n is the rank of individual data and N = total no. of data.
3. Arrange data and plot ln (– ln (1–Pf)) vs. ln s.
4. Obtain m and s0 from the plot.
s (MPa) ln s Rank, n Pf ln (- ln(1-Pf))
178 5.18 1 0.1 -2.25
210 5.35 2 0.2 -1.50
235 5.46 3 0.3 -1.03
248 5.51 4 0.4 -0.67
262 5.57 5 0.5 -0.37
276 5.62 6 0.6 -0.09
296 5.69 7 0.7 +0.19
318 5.76 8 0.8 +0.48
345 5.84 9 0.9 +0.83
é æ s öm V ù
P f = 1 – exp ê – ç ÷ ú
êë è s v ø V0 úû
Since the mean values of each data set have the same
survival probability
é æ s öm V ù é æ s öm V ù
Ps, mean = exp ê – ç 1 ÷ 1 ú = exp ê– ç 2 ÷ 2 ú
êë è s v ø V0 úû êë è s v ø V0 úû
s2 æ V1 ö1/m
= ç ÷
s1 è V2 ø
1. Tensile testing: Ve = V
2. 3-point bend test: Ve = Lf3-pt . V L2
+40
90% confidence
Error in m
(% of expected ±40%
value) 0
±10%
A reduction in m
indicates the introduction
of flaws, or extension of
flaws during service.
Frequency distribution
curve would show a long
tail of flaws.
Data not fitting
a Weibull plot
Danger:
Sub-critical cracks growth may occur during proof testing.
So effective proof testing demands inert, moisture-free test environment
with a rapid loading/unloading cycle (to minimise the time at maximum
stress).