of

“Child-Friendly Ensure child-

Philippines: A friendly local
Caring and governance
Protective through a
Society for mandatory
and by audit of LGU
Children” performance
on outcomes
on children
Offshoot of the Study on the
Functionality of LCPC
approved by the CWC Board
(8 August 2013)

Launched last April 16, 2013

during the Awarding
Ceremonies of the Presidential
Award for Child-Friendly
Municipalities and Cities
LCPC Functionality
assessment focused on
organizational strengths

CFLGA focus on positive

results for children
 Enact a
coherent Develop a purposive
government advocacy &
directive on the mobilization plan To
establishment that will place child mainstream
& operations of rights in the agenda Child
LCPC of LCE Rights in
Make Child the RPS
Rights
Responsive
Governance Improve
Award a LCPC
mobilizing monitoring
incentive system &
improved
reporting by
& feedback
to LCPC

Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance

 a results based assessment tool
hild & a mandatory audit designed
to identify the results of LGUs’
interventions
riendly
aims for LGUs to give priority to
children in planning, budgeting,
ocal legislation & delivery of services
to uphold children’s rights to:
overnance SURVIVAL, PROTECTION,
DEVELOPMENT & PARTICIPATION
Assessment is based on 12
udit indicators
1) % reduction in deaths among under -five y/o children
2) % reduction in children under six-y/o with below normal weights
3) % increase in day care attendance
4) Completion rate for elementary schooling
5) Absence of child labor or % reduction in child labor cases
6) % reduction in the number of children victims of violence, abuse,
neglect, exploitation and trafficking in persons
7) Safety measures for children in the community and schools
8) Extent of mainstreaming children’s rights to survival, development,
protection and participation in the Core Development Agenda
(CDA) of the LGU
a. Children's programs and projects in AIP
b. Budget share of children's programs vs. total budget of LGU
c. Budget Utilization
 d. With Annual State of Children's Report
e. Existence of Local Code for Children
f. Functional LCPC
g. Functional BCPCs: No. of "IDEAL" or "MATURE" BCPCs
h. BCPCs with Child Representative
9) An Ordinance or Executive Order establishing Barangay
Violence Against Women and their Children (VAWC) Desks
10) 2013 PhilHealth Accreditation in its main health facility or rural
health unit for the ff:
a. Maternal Care Services
b. Primary Care Services
11) A Local School Board (LSB) Plan for CY 2013 that is aligned with
the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
12) Completed at least 70% of its LSB plan for 2013

~ FORMS 1-4 and Form 1.a-g

Percentage reduction in the deaths among
children below five (5) years old.

Formula:

% Reduction = a-b x 100

b
Where:
a = no. of deaths under five years old children in 2014
divided by population of children under five years old
in 2014
b = no. of deaths under five years old children in 2013
divided by population of children under five years
old in 2013
 Percentage reduction in the deaths among children below
five (5) years old.
Formula:
% Reduction = a-b x 100
b
Given: (a) 2014 = 200 population of children below 5 yrs old
= 50 deaths
(b) 2013 = 100 population of children below 5 yrs old
= 50 deaths
= 50 - 50
200 100 X 100
50
100
= 50% percentage reduction

Percentage reduction of:
If the result is:
NEGATIVE, there is a
reduction
POSITIVE, there is an
INCREASE

-8.0% and below = 5

-6.0% to -7.9% = 4
-4.0% to - 5.9% = 3
-2.0% to -3.9% = 2
-1.0% to -1.9% = 1
0 - Any Positive Resultant
No data = 0
Percentage reduction in children under six years
old with below normal weights .
Formula:
% Reduction = a-b x 100
b
Where:
a = no. of children under 6 years old, below normal
weights in 2014 divided by population of
children under 6 years old in 2014
b = no. of children under six years old, below
normal weights in 2013 divided by population
of children under six years old in 2013
 If the result is:
Percentage reduction: NEGATIVE, there is a
reduction
POSITIVE, there is an
INCREASE
-25.0% and below = 5
-20.0% to -24.9% = 4
-14.0% to -19.9% = 3
-9.0% to -13.9% = 2
-1.0% to - 8.9% = 1
0 – Any Positive Resultant
No data = 0
Percentage increase in the number of 3-4 year-old children
attending day care/early learning center (public and private)

Formula:
% increase = a-b x 100
b
Where:
a = no. of 3 -4 years old children attending center-based
day care services in 2014 divided by population of
3-4 years old children in 2014
b = no. of 3 -4 years old children attending center-based
day care services in 2013 divided by population of
3-4 years old children in 2013
Percentage increase of:

25% and above = 5

20 - 24.9% = 4
If the result is:
15 - 19.9% = 3 NEGATIVE, there is a
10 – 14.9% = 2 reduction
Below 10% = 1 POSITIVE, there is an
INCREASE
No increase = 0
No data = 0
Completion rate for elementary schooling
(MDG target for SY 2015 – 2016 is
82.25%).

Completion Rate:
Result Point Score
82.20% and above 5

70.41% - 82.19% 4

58.63% - 70.40% 3

46.85% - 58.62% 2

Below 46.85% 1

No Data 0
Absence of child labor or reduction in child labor
cases.

Formula:
%reduction = a-b x 100
b
Where:
a = no. of child labor cases in 2014 divided by
population of children in 2014
b = no. of child labor cases in 2013 divided by
population of children in 2013
 Absence of child labor cases = 5

Percentage reduction of:

-50.0 % and below = 5

If the result is: -40.0% to -49.9% = 4
NEGATIVE, there
is a reduction -25.0% to -39.9% = 3
POSITIVE, there is
an INCREASE
-15.0% to -24.9% = 2
-1.0% to -14.9% = 1
0 - Any Positive Resultant = 0
No data = 0
Percentage reduction in the number of children
victims of violence, abuse, neglect , exploitation
and trafficking.
Formula:
% reduction = a-b x 100
b
Where:
a = no. of child victims of violence, abuse, neglect
and exploitation in 2014 divided by population of
children, 1 to below 18 years old in 2014.

b = no. of child victims of violence, abuse, neglect and

exploitation in 2013 divided by population of
children, 1 to below 18 years old in 2013.
 If the result is:
NEGATIVE, there
Percentage reduction of: is a reduction
POSITIVE, there is
an INCREASE

-50.0% and below = 5

-40.0% to -49.9% = 4
-25.0% to -39.9.% = 3
-15.0% to -24.9% = 2
-1.0% to -14.9% = 1
0 – Any Positive Resultant = 0
No data = 0
Safety measures for children in the community
and schools.
a. Presence of ordinance regulating the seating
capacity of tricycles/jeepneys and other modes of public
transport.
With ordinance:
Yes --- 1
No ---- 0
b. Presence of ordinance prohibiting the selling of
firecrackers to children
With ordinance:
Yes ---1
No ---0
Extent of mainstreaming of Children’s
rights to survival, development,
protection and participation in the core
development agenda of LGUs.

A. With Children’s programs and projects in AIP

Yes --- 1
No ---- 0
 ▪ B. Budget share (2014) C = a x 100
b

Where:
a = budget allocated for children’s program
in 2014
b = total budget of LGU in 2014
10% and above = 3
5% - 9.9% = 2
Below 5% =1
C. Budget utilization rate = Amount utilized for children x 100
Total budget for children

70% and above = 3

50% - 69.9% = 2
Below 50% = 1
 D. With Annual State of Children’s Report
Yes = 1
No = 0

▪ E. Local Code for Children

Yes = 1
No = 0
 ▪ F. Functional C/MCPC

At least mature functionality =1

Below mature = 0
No data = 0
 ▪ G. Functional BCPC

Barangays with ideal or mature

functionality:
50% and above =1
Less than 50% = 0
No data = 0
▪ H. Child Participation in BCPC

BCPC with child representative

75% and above = 1

Less than 75% = 0
No data = 0
A municipal/city ordinance or Executive Order
establishing Barangay Violence Against
Women and their Children (VAW/C) Desks.

Yes = 1
No = 0
 2014 Philhealth accreditation in its main health
facility or rural health unit for the ff:

a. Maternal Care Services

Yes = 1
No = 0

b. Primary Care Services

Yes = 1
No = 0
A Local School Board (LSB) Plan for CY 2014
that is aligned with the School Improvement
Plan.

Yes = 1
No = 0
Completed at least 70% of its LSB Plan for 2014

70% and above completed

Yes = 1
No = 0
POINT SCORE EQUIVALENT POINT SCORE EQUIVALENT
RATING RATING
48 100% 35 87%
47 99% 34 86%
46 98% 33 85%
45 97% 32 84%
44 96% 31 83%
43 95% 30 82%
42 94% 29 81%
41 93% 28 80%
40 92% 27 79%
39 91% 26 78%
38 90% 25 77%
37 89% 24 76%
36 88% 23 75%
CFLGA Form 1: Data Capture Form
 CFLGA Form 1-A: Data from City/Mun. Budget Office
 CFLGA Form 1-B: Data from City/Mun. DILG Office
 CFLGA Form 1-C: Data from City/Mun. SWDO
 CFLGA Form 1-D: Data from City/Mun. Planning Office
 CFLGA Form 1-E: Data from DepEd
 CFLGA Form 1-F: Data from City/Mun Health Office
 CFLGA Form 1-F: Data from Sangguniang
Bayan/Panglungsod
 CFLG Form 2: Summary of Scores per City/Mun.
 CFLG Form 3: Consolidated Provincial Overall
Rating
 CFLG Form 4: Consolidated : Regional Overall
Rating
 CFLG Form 5: Consolidated Regional Eligible LGUs
 CFLG Form 6: Consolidated Audit Passers
August 16-17, 2017
August 31, 2017
 Regional Sub-Committee for the Welfare of Children
(RSCWC) Meeting held last October 13, 2017, to wit:
1. For our office to convene the
Provincial/City/Municipal Inter-Agency Monitoring Task
Force (IMTF) Members and conduct onsite orientation
on Child-Friendly Local Governance Audit (CFLGA) and
its processes
2. For our office to allocate budget for the said
orientation – AOPB 2018: Orientation of DILG FOs re
CFLGA
3. Provide feedback on the audit results to the
provinces -
 Revalidate/review submitted
forms

Decide on the scores of LGUs

with problematic data entries

Prepare the Consolidated

Regional Overall Rating (Form 4)
 Highest scored indicator:
Elementary completion rate
Brgy. VAW Desks = 92%
PhilHealth Accreditation = 84%
LSB Plan in SIP = 97%
At least 70% completion of LSB Plan = 92%
Children’s programs in AIP = 96%
Budget utilization for children’s programs
Least scored indicator:
Indicator #7.b - Ordinance prohibiting sale
of firecrackers
Increase in DC attendance
Budget allocated for children's programs
in 2015 AIP
Low score in child labor indicator due to
lack of baseline data (pop. of under 18
y/o)
Annual State of Children's Report
 97
83 85 83
79 79

2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA

 2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA
100 93
85 88 86 85 87
90 82
80 79 90 78 81 91
80 85
81 79 81 81 81
70 74
71
60 65
50
40
30
20
10
0
120

100
98
88 85 85 87
81 81 78 81
80 75 77 75
70 70 73

60

89 93
40 79 78 82 82 82 79 83 77 83
74 75 75 73
20

2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA

100
90 88 87 87 86 83
80 75 78
74 74 84 73
80 70 81 78
70 76 66 77 75
73 72 73
60 66 69

50
40
30
20
10
0

2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA

 90 92
83 83 83
74 87 76 91 78
69 68 71 83
72 74 75
71 68 67 67
59

2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA

100 93 92
90 92 92
88 88
90 86 85 83 85 83 85 8683 86
82 80 80
80 77 78 76 75 76 77
75
72 71 72 7471 72 74
70 64
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

2016 CFLGA 2017 CFLGA

CFLGA 2016 – 84%
CFLGA 2017 – 75%

57 or vs. 47
Passers
78% last yr.
2016
2017
Highest Score –
95% Highest Score –
Lowest – 64% 98%
Lowest – 66%
1. Pinamalayan, ORM - 98%
2. Buenavista, MDQ – 97%
3. Rizal, OCM - 93%
4. Narra, PAL - 92%
5. Calatrava, ROM - 92%
6. San Agustin, ROM - 92%
7. San Jose, ROM - 92% 1. Agutaya, Palawan - 66%
8. Kalayaan, PAL - 90% 2. Quezon, Palawan - 68%
3. Linapacan, Palawan - 69%
4. Pola, ORM - 70%
5. Puerto Galera, ORM - 70%
6. Busuanga, PAL - 70%
Thank You!!!
It was once said that
the moral test of
government is how that
government treats
those who are in the
dawn of life (the
children), those who are
in the twilight of life
(the elderly), and those
who are in the shadows
of life (the sick, the
needy and the
handicapped).

~ Hubert H. Humphrey