IRM IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION

(Provincial Assessor’s Office)

By:
Philip John Alturas
Gershom Felipe Dela Torre
Interpreting the results of the survey
 Results
Based on the survey we had discovered the
following;
• The office has information technology
implementation
• The network, data and application systems
integration is implemented at great extent
• They have distributed facilities
 Results
• The automation of office capabilities is
implemented at great extent
• The IT Head is not entirely responsible for
corporate business planning process
• The IT Head is responsible for distributed
information approval of corporate information
system and technology acquisitions, and
assessment of new technologies
 Results
• Quality assurance Program, data
administration is implemented at some extent
• Corporate data architecture, policy on data
ownership is implemented at some extent
• Data shared between users and departments
at very great extent
 Results
• Data security, access control security is
implemented at great extent
• Business continuity/ disaster recovery plan is
implemented at great extent
• Information systems and technology plan
reflects business goals
 Results
• Cooperative processing and client/server
applications is implemented at great extent
• Data communications between central and
distributed facilities implemented at great
extent
• Standards for distributed information systems
and technology is implemented at great
extent
 Results
• Formal methodology for systems development
is implemented at great extent
• Use of automated development tools (CASE,
code generators) implemented at great extent
• Inventory of corporate data and information,
company IT facilities implemented at great
extent
 Results
• Users participate in advisory committees at
very great extent
• Senior management participates in advisory
committees at great extent
 Results
Functions implemented at some extent
• IT Head is not entirely possible for distributed
information in the company
• Formal support for end user computing
• Training programs for end users
 Results
Functions implemented at some extent
• Planning process for information systems and
technology incorporated end users
• Systems and support for management
decision making (DSS, EIS)
• Information systems and technology
advisory/oversight committee(s)
What are our findings?
 Findings
Based from the results we have found out that
the company;
• Has implementation information technology
and network integration
• Distribution of facilities is being done
• IT head has limits in implementing IRM
systems and policies
 Findings
• Information systems and technology
advisory/oversight committee not established
• Support for training end users is poor
Conclusion
 Conclusion
• In conclusion the company is the
implementation of IRM is somewhat at
average. Simply because some functions of
the IRM implementation are not covered and
must be improved.
Recommendations
 Recommendations
• Improve training program for end users
• Make an information systems and technology
advisory/oversight committee