14th Tnternational Conference on

Structural & Geotechnical

Engineering 2015

BEHAVIOUR OF PERFORATED STEEL PLATE

SHEAR WALLS
Presented by

Bassem khalad Abd El-Qader

( M.Sc. In Structural Engineering, Ain Shams University)

Supervision

Prof. Dr. Mohammed A.El-Aghoury Prof. Dr. Sherif Abdel-Basset

Professor of Steel Structures Professor of Steel Structures
Structural Engineering Department Structural Engineering Department
Ain Shams University Ain Shams University
 1 Introduction

2 Literature review

3 Verification
Contents
4 Parametric Study for Single Story

5 Conclusions
1- Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW)
Anchor Beam Level 4
Vertical Boundary
Steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) Element (VBE) Plate 4

have been used in recent years Level 3

since 1970s as an effective lateral Infill Plate Plate 3

force resisting system.

Level 2

Plate 2

Horizontal Boundary
Element (HBE) Level 1

Plate 1
2- Steel Plate Shear Wall Types.

Stiffened Steel Shear Wall Stiffened Steel Shear Wall Stiffened Steel Shear Wall
with Window opining with Wall opining

Composite Steel Shear Wall Un-Stiffened Steel Shear Wall Perforated Steel Shear Wall
3- The Advantages of SPSW.
 Wall Thickness.
 Building Weight & Economy.
 Fast Construction.
 Ductility.

4- The disadvantages of SPSW.

 Construction Sequence.
 New System.
 SPSW APPLICATIONS
1- Using SPW in new building

L.A. LIVE HOTEL VIEW THE U.S. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

56 STOREY 23 STOREY
 STATEMENT PROBLEM

MIN.
Forming THICKNESS
Tension Field UTILITIES
>>
Action in Panel REQUIRMENTS
earlier REQ.
THICKNES
Courtesy of Robert Tremblay, Ecole
Polytechnique, et Eric Lachapelle,
Lainco Inc, Montreal
 Thorburn et al.(1983) :
 L: Panel Width
L. t p
1+  tp: Panel Thickness
4 2. Ac
tan α =
H. t p  H: Panel Height
1+
Ab
 Ab: Beam Area
 Ac: Column Area
 Timler and Kulak .(1983) :

L. t p  Ic: Column Inertia

1+
4 2. Ac
tan α =
1 H3
1 + H. t p +
Ab 360. Ic . L
 Berman and Bruneau (2003) :

1
Vp = . F . t . L. sin 2α  Fyp: Panel yield stress
2 yp p

 Roberts and Sabouri-Ghomi (1992):

Vp.perf D
= 1−
Vp d

 D: Perforation Diameter
 d: Panel height
 Vian et al. (2005):

Vp.perf D
= 1−
Vp Sdiag

- Sdiag: diagonal spacing between

perforations

 Purba et al.(2006):

Vp.perf D
= 1 − 𝟎. 𝟕
Vp Sdiag
 FE MODEL VS EXPREMINTA L
PERFORATED SPSW FRAME

Finite Element model Vian (2005) Experimental Work

2x4 m single-bay single story
 FE MODEL VS EXPREMINTAL
PERFORATED SPSW FRAME
Force Vs Displacement for Perforated SPSW Single-Story Frame
Force (kN)

Perforated FE Model
Experimental Vian(2005)

Displacement (mm)
 FE MODEL VS EXPREMINTAL
SOLID SPSW FRAME

Finite Element model Vian (2005) Experimental Work

2x4 m single-bay single-story
 FE MODEL VS EXPREMINTAL
Solid SPSW FRAME

Force Vs Displacement for Solid SPSW Single-Story Frame

Force (kN)

Solid FE Model
Experimental Vian(2005)

Displacement (mm)
 FINIT ELEMENTS MODEL DIMENSION
H=3m
L=6m
tp=2.6mm
RRBS=250mm
D=200mm
Spacing=300mm,
Ib=446872513.3mm4
(W18x65)
Ic=495896990.7mm4
(W18x71)
Fypanel=165MPa,
FyFrame=345MPa
 FINIT ELEMENTS MODELS
Single-Bay Single-Story Frame
3x6m

Perforated SPSW Solid SPSW Bare Frame

ABAQUS/CAE
(GUI)
 Effect of Height
Heights
LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR DIFFERENT
HEIGHTS
=3.0 m 2000

1600
=4.5 m

Load (kN)
1200

=6 m
800

=7.5 m 400
H=3 m H=4.5 m H=6 m
H=7.5 m H=9 m
H=7.5m 0
=9.0 m 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Displacement (mm)
 Effect of Panel Thickness

Plate Thickness LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR

DIFFERENT PANELS` THICKNESS
3000
=2.6 mm
2500

=3.0 mm 2000

Load (kN)
1500
=4.0 mm
1000

=5.0 mm 500 tp=2.6 mm tp=3 mm tp=4 mm

tp=6.0 mm tp=5 mm tp=6 mm
0
=6.0 mm 0 100 200
Displacement (mm)
300
 Effect of Column Inertia

Ic/Ibconst LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR DIFFERENT

CLUMNS` INERTIA
=0.50
2000
=1.00 1800
=1.50 1600

Load (kN)
=2.00 1400
1200
=2.50 1000 Ic/Ib =0.5 Ic/Ib =1.0
=3.00 800 Ic/Ib =1.5 Ic/Ib =2.0
=3.50 600 Ic/Ib =2.5 Ic/Ib =3.0
400 Ic/Ib =3.5 Ic/Ib =4.0
=4.00 200 Ic/Ib =4.5 Ic/Ib =5.0
=4.50 Ic/Ib =5.0 m 0
=5.00 0 100 200 300 400
Displacement (mm)
 Effect Perforation Dia.

Perforation Dia. LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR

DIFFERENT PERFORATIONS` DIAMETER
2500
=100 mm
2000

Load (kN)
=150 mm 1500

=200 mm 1000

500
D=0 mm D=100 mm D=150 mm
=250 mm D=200 mm D=250 mm D=300 mm
D=100mm 0
0 100 200 300 400
=300 mm Displacement (mm)
 Effect of Perforation Angle α

Perforation Angle α LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR DIFFERENT

PERFORATIONS` Angle α
2000
=40º 1800
1600
1400
=42.5º

Load (kN)
1200
1000
=45º 800
600
400
=47.5º 200
α=40 α=42.5 α=45
α=47.5 α=50
α =50° 0
=50º 0 100 200
Displacement (mm)
300
 Effect RBS Radius

RBS Radius LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR

DIFFERENT RBS` Radius
2500

=0 mm
2000

Load (kN)
=75 mm 1500

1000
=150 mm
500 RBS=0 mm RBS=75 mm
RBS=150 mm RBS=200 mm
=200 mm RRBS = 0 mm RBS=250 mm
0
0 100 200 300
=250 mm Displacement (mm)
 Effect of Yield Stress
Panel Yield Stress
LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR
DIFFERENT PANEL`S GRADE
=165 Mpa 2500
(LYS)
2000

Load (kN)
=250 Mpa 1500

(A36) 1000

500
=290 Mpa LYS A36
Fy= 345 Mpa A572[Gr.42] A572[Gr.50]
(A572[Gr42]) A572[GR.50]
0
0 100 200 300
Displacement (mm)
=345 Mpa
(A572[Gr50])
 Effect of Beam Inertia

Ib/Icconst LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR

DIFFERENT BEAM`S INERTIA
3500
=3.00
3000

2500
=3.50

Load (kN)
2000

1500
=4.00
1000
Ib/Ic =3.0
500 Ib/Ic =3.5
=4.50 Ib/Ic =4.0
Ib/Ic =5.0 m 0
0 100 200 300
=5.00 Displacement (mm)
 Effect of Perforation Layout Spacing

Regular Spacing LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT FOR

DIFFERENT PERFORATION`S
SPACING
2000
=300 mm
1500

Load (kN)
=400 mm
1000
Regular (spacing 300 mm)
Regular (spacing 400 mm)
=500 mm 500 Regular (spacing 500 mm)
Regular (spacing 600 mm)
Regular Spacing Staggered
=600 mm 0
=600mm 0 200 400 600
Displacement (mm)
 PROGRESSIVE ANALYSIS
EFFECT PERFORATION DIA.
1.0
0.9 y = -0.6x + 1
0.8
0.7
Vperf / Vsolid

0.6
0.5
y = -0.7x + 1
0.4
0.3 Vperf/Vsolid analytical
0.2
Vperf / Vsolid FEM
0.1
0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
D/Sdiag

Vp.perf D
= 1 − 𝟎. 𝟔
Vp Sdiag
 Conclusions for Single-Story Frame
1-As infill plate’s thickness decrease, stresses spread more uniformly.

2- Staggered perforations have higher strength than equivalent regular perforations.

3- A modification to previous finding for the strength of PSPSW is proposed in

relation as a function of solid SPSW to use factor 0.6 instead of 0.7 as following:
Vp.perf D
= 1 − 𝟎. 𝟔
Vp Sdiag
4- Some factors increase the strength capacity of the perforated steel plate
shear walls as the increase of (tp), (Fyp), (Ib) & (Sdiag).

5- Some factors have a slight increase in the strength capacity of the perforated
steel plate shear walls as the increase of (Ic) & (α).

6- Some factors reduce the strength capacity of the perforated steel plate shear
walls as the increase of (H), (D) &(RRBS).
Any Questions