CAPSTONE

Conde, J.
Estrella, L. Gacusan, R.
Diocales, K.
Group Leader

*Paste Group Picture! (wallet size)*

 CAPSTONE

____________________________________
Grade & Section

___________________________________
Research Teacher
 TEACHER’S RECORD
1st QUARTER, 2nd SEMESTER
STUDENT’S NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(Alphabetically Arranged)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.
 RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC
SCORING GUIDE:
1= no evidence of indicator being met; 2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement; 3= acceptable
evidence of indicator being met for course purposes; 4= consistent evidence of indicator being met; 5= exemplary evidence
of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. The content, structure, and format of the product.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY

QUALIFIERS 1 2 3 4 5
1. Significance of the topic
2. Hypothesis/assumption of the study can be clearly
understood and is well supported.
3. Uses sufficient and appropriate primary resources to
develop background or context for research question
4. Culminates with a clearly stated purpose/ research
question
5. Research gap is clearly stated with supporting
statements
6. Scope and delimitations are clear and logical.
7. Chapter summary is complete and is detailed.
 RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC
SCORING GUIDE:
1= no evidence of indicator being met; 2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement; 3= acceptable
evidence of indicator being met for course purposes; 4= consistent evidence of indicator being met; 5= exemplary evidence
of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. The content, structure, and format of the product.

CHAPTER 2 : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

QUALIFIERS 1 2 3 4 5
1. Literature review includes at least 10 resources from
books and 4 from other sources, e.g. Scholarly articles.
2. Uses sufficient and appropriate primary resources to
describe/explain theoretical assumptions that
contextualize the research question.
3. Includes current literature highly relevant to the topic.
4. Establishes an advanced theoretical framework.
5. Establishes an advanced conceptual framework.
6. Chapter summary is complete and is detailed.
 PEER EVALUATION FORM FOR GROUP WORK

SCORING GUIDE:
Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, indicate the extent to which you
agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=agree; 4=strongly agree). Total
the numbers in each column.

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group

EVALUATION CRITERIA member: member: member: member: Member: member: member: member:

1. Attends group meetings regularly

and arrives on time.
2. Contributes meaningfully to group
discussions.
3. Completes assigned work on time.
4. Prepares work in a quality manner.
5. Demonstrates a cooperative and
supportive attitude.
5Contributes significantly to the
success of the project.

TOTAL:
 RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC
SCORING GUIDE:
1= no evidence of indicator being met; 2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement; 3= acceptable
evidence of indicator being met for course purposes; 4= consistent evidence of indicator being met; 5= exemplary evidence
of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. The content, structure, and format of the product.

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
QUALIFIERS 1 2 3 4 5
1. Clearly describes the selection methods,
parameters, subjects and setting, or context of the
study based on accepted research practice.
2.Clearly describes data gathering methodology
based on accepted research practice.
3. Clearly describes data analysis methodologies
based on accepted research practice
4. Is appropriate for publication or presentation with
little or no revision.
5. Chapter summary is complete and is detailed.
 PEER EVALUATION FORM FOR GROUP WORK

SCORING GUIDE:
Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, indicate the extent to which you
agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=agree; 4=strongly agree). Total
the numbers in each column.

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group

EVALUATION CRITERIA member: member: member: member: Member: member: member: member:

1. Attends group meetings regularly

and arrives on time.
2. Contributes meaningfully to group
discussions.
3. Completes assigned work on time.
4. Prepares work in a quality manner.
5. Demonstrates a cooperative and
supportive attitude.
5Contributes significantly to the
success of the project.

TOTAL:
 TEACHER’S RECORD
2nd QUARTER, 2nd SEMESTER
STUDENT’S NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(Alphabetically Arranged)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.
 RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC

SCORING GUIDE:
1= no evidence of indicator being met; 2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement; 3= acceptable
evidence of indicator being met for course purposes; 4= consistent evidence of indicator being met; 5= exemplary evidence
of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. The content, structure, and format of the product.

CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS OF DATA

QUALIFIERS 1 2 3 4 5
1. Accurately stated based on the data.
2. Shows critical analysis of research related to
topic and compared to current study.
3. Statistical data is well presented through tables
and graphs.(QN )
4. Statistical treatment is effective and valid. (QN)
5. The instrument used is valid.
6. The instrument used is reliable
7. Chapter summary is complete and detailed.
 RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC

SCORING GUIDE:
1= no evidence of indicator being met; 2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement; 3= acceptable
evidence of indicator being met for course purposes; 4= consistent evidence of indicator being met; 5= exemplary evidence
of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. The content, structure, and format of the product.

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

QUALIFIERS 1 2 3 4 5
1. Thoughtful, detailed and comprehensive discussion is presented
.
2. Key findings are specifically related to previous research.
Implications are well presented
3. Shows creative thinking and thoughtful insight
4. Project is well organized, needing only very little clarification, if
any
5. The entire project is presented in format appropriate for intended
scholarly venue.
6. Presentation of the material is highly appropriate and
professional
7. Paper is free of major spelling, grammatical and punctuation
errors
8. All citations and references are presented in proper format and
do not need revision.
 PEER EVALUATION FORM FOR GROUP WORK

SCORING GUIDE:
Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, indicate the extent to which you
agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=agree; 4=strongly agree). Total
the numbers in each column.

Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group

EVALUATION CRITERIA member: member: member: member: Member: member: member: member:

1. Attends group meetings regularly

and arrives on time.
2. Contributes meaningfully to group
discussions.
3. Completes assigned work on time.
4. Prepares work in a quality manner.
5. Demonstrates a cooperative and
supportive attitude.
5Contributes significantly to the
success of the project.

TOTAL: