Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hydrated?
● Objectives:
○ Interview the athletic trainer about their knowledge of hydration and student dehydration by
September 17, 2018.
○ Interview the volleyball, field hockey, and softball coaches individually by September 23, 2018
about their knowledge of their team’s hydration
○ Survey the volleyball, field hockey and softball athletes and analyze the results by September 26,
2018 about their knowledge and actual consumption of water during game days.
Part 1: Needs Assessment (con’t)
● Interview with athletic trainer:
○ Believes the target population is not hydrated enough.
○ Many athletes go into the athletic trainer’s office dehydrated and talk about the color of their urine
○ She also stated that a lot of the players tend to drink caffeinated drinks,
○ The athletic trainer recommends at least 8 ounces for every hour they are practicing.
○ Since the trainer is present at most sports events, her observations are that the athletes only take a
● Objectives:
○ 80% of our target audience will understand the ways to improve hydration.
○ 75% of our target audience will know how much water to drink before, during and after games.
○ 75% of our community of female athletes will increase their water intake.
○ 50% of athlete injuries due to dehydration will be less prevalent in our community.
Part 3: Lesson Plan
● Health Belief Model
○ Emphasizes perceived threat as a motivating source and perceived benefits as a preferred path to action
● Target audience: Female collegiate athletes between the ages of 18-22 on the Marywood Field Hockey team.
● Program goal: The participants will learn the benefits of hydration in order to prevent fatigue, poor performance, and
injuries.
● Objectives: The participants will be able to:
○ Improve hydration knowledge by understanding how much water to drink before, during and after exercise.
○ Understand other ways to improve their overall hydration, besides just water.
○ Identify the health consequences when overall hydration is not achieved.
● Duration: ~40 Minutes
Part 3: Lesson Plan (con’t)
● Weaknesses- Getting the whole team to come together to listen. Everyone is busy and have their own
schedules making it difficult for them to want to come to this presentation. Due to this, it may not be a truly
effective presentation for the whole team.
● Opportunities- A possible opportunity to overcome this would be giving an incentive to the athletes after
the presentation
● Threats- The threats of this program that could make it ineffective is the possibility of the athlete’s busy
schedule, school work or other commitments, getting in the way of them performing these interventions on
a day to day basis. This can cause them to continue to lack good hydration status. An example of this would
include forgetting to bring water to class and not catching up on what they missed.
Part 4: Marketing Strategy
Product- The product presented to the target audience is nutrition education on proper hydration.
● Place- Center of Athletics ● Place- Center of Athletics and ● Place- Study room in LC
and Wellness Wellness ● Promotion- one of the team
● Promotion- Team members
● Promotion- marketed through
GroupMe (2x) a volleyball player to tell her ● Position- (convenient) in
● Position- convenient, due teammates and the coach the middle of the day so
to the whole team being they have enough time to
in attendance, as well as ● Position- inconvenient, due to hydrate properly before
the ability to hydrate for their season ending, it was at practice
their end of season party.
future training
Part 5: Materials
● Powerpoint
● Paper / pencil
● Calculator
● Labeled water bottle
● Poland Springs Water Bottle (Softball Team)
Part 6: Reflection
● Process Evaluation
● Structure Evaluation
● Impact Evaluation
● Outcome Evaluation
References
Dehydration. (2018, February 15).
Ericson, J. (2013, July 04). 75% of Americans May Suffer From Chronic Dehydration, According to Doctors
Nnakwe, N. E. (2013). Community nutrition: Planning health promotion and disease prevention.
Popkin, B. M., & D'Anci, K. E. (2010). Figure 2f from: Irimia R, Gottschling M (2016) Taxonomic revision of Rochefortia Sw. (Ehretiaceae, Boraginales).