Teddy Mantoro

teddy@ieee.org
 Professor and researcher in the Faculty Science and Technology,
Sampoerna University, Jakarta, Indonesia
 Adjunct Professor, Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Technologi
Malaysia (UTM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (http://www.ais.utm.my/teddy/)
 Invited Lecturer - Pasca Sarjana: FTI-UBL dan PMPBI-UNJ, Guest Lecture –
postgrad-Fasilkom-UI .
 Chair of SKKNI-Mobile Computing, Kemkominfo (2015-6), member of tim-
Ahli penyusunan standard hasil penelitian –BSNP (2016) and deputy chair
of KKNI Development, APTIKOM (2014-2017).
 Awarded a PhD - CS (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia)
and MSc – CS (Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand).
 Academic Profile
TPC/REVIEWER 2016 (27 CONFERENCES) SCIEMATHIC 2016 (BALI, INDONESIA), ISYM 2016, APACE 2016

 130+ Publications
(LANGKAWI, MALAYSIA), CITSM 2016 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), IEACON 2016, ANDIC 2016, ICIC 2016
(LOMBOK, INDONESIA), ICSN 2016, ICMCS 2016 (MARRAKECH, MOROCCO), UBICOMM 2016 (VENICE,
ITALY), MOMM 2016 (SINGAPORE), ICACI 2016, ICCN 2016, PECON 2016 (MELAKA, MALAYSIA), ICIICC
[Scopus: 94 papers] 2016, SYSSARM 2016, PIAMSE 2016, IEEE-GCC 2016, ICINN 2016, IACE-T 2016, NCM 2016 (SEOUL,
KOREA), EECSI 2016, EDUSTS 2017, ETC.

 25+ Awards TPC 2015 (34 conferences): ICCVIA 2015 (SOUSSE, TUNISIA), EQESS 2015 (DUBAI, UEA), CSNT 2015,

 20+ Research
PECON 2015 (KUCHING, SERAWAK, MALAYSIA), UBICOMM 2015 (NICE, FRANCE), ICOICT 2015 (BALI,
INDONESIA), EECSI 2015 (PALEMBANG, INDONESIA), MEI 2015 (ORLANDO, USA), AWARECAST 2015
(SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, US), TIME-E 2015 (SAMOSIR ISLAND, INDONESIA), IIC 2015, CSNT 2015, MOMM
Grants 2015, ISYSM'2015 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), ICACCI-2015 (KERALA, INDIA), MOBIAPPS, 2015 (ROME,
ITALY), ICACOMIT 2015 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), ICSPDM' 2015, WOTBD 2015 (NIAGARA FALLS,

 5 Books ONTARIO, CANADA), GAMEPEC 2015, ICSPDM 2015, PIAMSE 2015), ICOED 2015, EQESS 2015 (DUBAI,
UEA), PECON 2015 (KUCHING, SERAWAK, MALAYSIA), ICACCI 2015, CGMIP2015, CYBERSEC2015, CITSM

(Elsevier/Atlantic, 2016, etc.

IEEE, Lambert, IIUM, TPC 2014: AINA 2014 (VICTORIA, CANADA), ICMCS 2014 (MARAKKESH, MOROCCO), UBICOMM 2014
(ROME, ITALY), ICT4M 2014 (KUCHING-MY), LTIA2014 (DELHI-INDIA), ICOSSEET 2014 (PENANG, MY),

IGI) ICOICT 2014 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), CHUSER 2014 (PENANG, MY), TIME-E 2014 (BANDUNG,
INDONESIA), AWARECAST 2014 (SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, US), ARICT 2014 (DUHOK, IRAK), ACSAT 2014

 4 Patents Filing
(AMMAN, JORDAN), SNATI 2014 (Yogjakarta, Indonesia), etc.

TPC 2013: ICICM 2013 (KL, MY) , ICT4M 2013 (RABAT, MOROCCO), ICCNT 2013 (BUSAN, KOREA), ICIS

 4 Int’l Journal 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), TIME-E 2013 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), IGCESH 2013 (JOHOR, MY), CSIT 2013
(YOGJA, INDONESIA), SHUSER 2013 (PENANG, MY), IDCTA 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), ICMIC 2013,

Editors (BANGKOK, THAILAND), INC 2013 (BUSAN, KOREA), NCM 2013 (JEJU ISLAND, KOREA), ICIPM 2013
(SEOUL, KOREA), ICIDT 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), WVNT/NETYS 2013 (MARRAKECH, MORROCO), BWCCA-
2013 (COMPIEGNE, FRANCE), IPIN 2013 (MONTBÉLIARD, FRANCE), AWARECAST 2013, ACSAT 2013, etc.

GENERAL CHAIR FOR CGMIP 2015 AND CYBERSEC 2015, (29-31 OCTOBER 2015, JAKARTA, INDONESIA),
CHAIR OF ICCMT 2013 (CHIANG MAY, THAILAND), CO-CHAIRS FOR ICT4M 2013, SERAWAK, MY, ICIMC
2013, KL, MY AND ARICT 2014, IRAK), TPC chair for ICIC 2016, LOMBOK, INDONESIA.
 Pengindeks bereputasi
 Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF)
 h-index dan g-index
 Penelitian Ilmiah
 Mencari bidang yang akan diteliti
 AI Method in Brief
 Jenis Publikasi karya ilmiah
 Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)
 Penulisan Proposal dan publikasi Ilmiah
 Judul
 Abstract
 Introduction, methodology, etc.
o Contoh penelitian dan hasilnya
 Menjelaskan tentang pengindeks bereputasi
 Membedakan Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak
(IF)
 Dapat menghitung h-index dan g-index
 Dapat menetapkan area yang akan diteliti
 Dapat menetapkan Idea (Problem dan Solusi
yang diusulkan) pada suatu penelitian
 Menulis proposal penelitian/paper dengan
Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) yang rendah.
 Penulisan Proposal yang berpotensi
menghasilkan publikasi Ilmiah di jurnal
Internasional bereputasi
Variables:
 Author
 Area – define by
author
 Citations: All and the
last 5 years
 h-Index
 i10-index
 Total papers
Peneliti A Peneliti B
+++ reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF --- reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF
--- first author atau corresponding author +++ first author atau corresponding author
---- bahasa Indonesia +++ bahasa Indonesia
Disiplin ilmu: Biologi Disiplin ilmu: Ilmu komputer
Citations=660 Citations=1176
h-index = 14 h-index = 17
I10-index=18 I10-index=35
Peneliti A Peneliti B
h-index=12 h-index=0
Docs=26 Docs=1
Citations=390 from 322 docs Citations=0 from 0 docs
Variables:
 Author Id
 ORCID
 # docs
 # Citations
 # docs yg mengutip
 h-Index
 # co-authors
 Subject area
 Graph visualization
Variables:
 Jumlah Docs
 Jumlah sitasi
 Jumlah sitasi
tanpa self-citation
 Citing-articles
tanpa self-citation
 Rata-2 citation per
paper
 h-index
 Graph visualization
 (ResearchID)
The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the
productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar.
Proposed by Jorge E. Hirsch (2005).

The index is a measure of the number of highly impactful papers a scientist has
published. The larger the number of important papers, the higher the h-index,
regardless of where the work was published.

To calculate it, only two pieces of information are required: the total number of
papers published (Np) and the number of citations (Nc) for each paper.

The h-index is defined by how many h of a researcher’s publications (Np) have at

least h citations each.

Source: http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/
 ‘The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation
number greater than or equal to h, is a useful index to
characterise the scientific output of a
researcher.’ (JE Hirsch)

 The h-index is a measure of the number of publications

published (productivity) as well as how often they are cited
(impact).

 PRODUCTIVITY + IMPACT = INFLUENCE

If your h-index is 15, you have 15 papers cited 15 times or more.
If your h-index is 20, you have 20 papers cited 20 times or more.
 Peneliti C Peneliti D
H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi h-index’s weakness -- not consider:
1 386 145
2 247 40
• Type of author
3 313 27 • # papers
4 37 18 • # citations
5 26 14 • # span of time
6 0 5
7 0 5
Total 1109 257
The G-index was proposed by Leo Egghe in his paper "Theory and
Practice of the G-Index" in 2006 as an improvement on the H-Index.

G-Index is calculated this way: "[Given a set of articles] ranked in

decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the G-
Index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received
(together) at least g^2 citations." (from Harzig's Publish or Perish Manual)

Advantages of the G-Index:

Accounts for the performance of author's top articles
Helps to make more apparent the difference between authors'
respective impacts. The inflated values of the G-Index help to give
credit to lowly-cited or non-cited papers while giving credit for highly-
cited papers.

Disadvantages of the G-Index:

Introduced in 2006 and debate continues whether G-Index is superior to
H-Index. Might not be as widely accepted as H-Index.
g-index’s weakness -- not consider:
• Type of Author
• # papers
• # citations
• # span of time
 Peneliti C Peneliti D
N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif NxN N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif NxN
Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi
1 386 386 1 1 145 145 1
2 247 633 4 2 40 185 4
3 313 946 9 3 27 212 9
4 37 983 16 4 18 230 16
5 26 1009 25 5 14 234 25
6 0 1009 36 6 5 239 36
7 0 1009 49 7 5 244 49
8 0 1009 64 8 1 245 64
9 0 1009 81 9 1 246 81
10 0 1009 100 10 1 247 100
11 0 1009 121 11 0 247 121
12 0 1009 144 12 0 247 144
13 0 1009 169 13 0 247 169
14 0 1009 196 14 0 247 196
15 0 1009 225 15 0 247 225
16 0 1009 256 16 0 247 256
17 0 1009 289 17 0 247 289
18 0 1009 324 18 0 247 324
19 0 1009 361 19 0 247 361
20 0 1009 400 20 0 247 400
21 0 1009 441 21 0 247 441
22 0 1009 484 22 0 247 484
23 0 1009 529 23 0 247 529
24 0 1009 576 24 0 247 576
25 0 1009 625 25 0 247 625
26 0 1009 676 26 0 247 676
27 0 1009 729 27 0 247 729
28 0 1009 784 28 0 247 784
29 0 1009 841 29 0 247 841
30 0 1009 900 30 0 247 900
31 0 1009 961 31 0 247 961
32 0 1009 1024 32 0 247 1024
33 0 1009 1089 33 0 247 1089
34 0 1009 1156 34 0 247 1156
h-index=5 g-index=31 h-index=5 g-index=15
 Peneliti C Peneliti D
H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi i10-index’s weakness -- not consider:
1 386 145
• Type of author
2 247 40
3 313 27 • # papers
4 37 18 • # citations
5 26 14 • # span of time
6 0 5
7 0 5
Total 1109 257
 IF originally belong to Web of Science (WoS) of Thomson
Reuters.
 Journal Citation Report (JCR) – WoS and Scimago Journal
and Country Rank (SJR)
 The journal Impact Factor is the average number of times
articles from the journal published in the past two years have
been cited in the JCR year. The Impact Factor is calculated
by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the
total number of articles published in the two previous years.
 http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/help/h_impfact.htm
Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)
Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)
Impact factor tahun 2015 (diumumkan ~Juni 2016)

Jurnal X mempunyai IF=0.5

Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 6 Number of items published in: 2014 = 10
2013 = 4 2013 = 10
Sum = 10 Sum = 20
Calculation: Cites to recent items 10 = 0.5
Number of recent items 20

Jurnal Y memiliki IF: 0.696

Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 17 Number of items published in: 2014 = 10
2013 = 23 2013 =10
Sum = 40 Sum = 20
Calculation: Cites to recent items 40 = 2.0
Number of recent items 20
Journal Impact Factor is from Journal Citation Report (JCR), a product of Thomson ISI
(Institute for Scientific Information). JCR provides quantitative tools for evaluating
journals.
Perhitungan impact factor PALSU (Bogus Impact Factor Companies)?
 CiteFactor  http://www.citefactor.org
 Global Impact Factor  http://globalimpactfactor.com
 ISRA: Journal Impact Factor(JIF)  http://www.israjif.org
 IMPACT Journals  http://www.impactjournals.us
 General Impact Factor (GIF)  http://generalimpactfactor.com
 Journal Impact Factor (JIF)  http://www.jifactor.com
 Universal Impact Factor  http://uifactor.org
 IndexCopernicus  http://journals.indexcopernicus.com
 International Impact Factor Services (IIFS)  http://impactfactorservice.com
 ISI International Scientific Indexing  http://isindexing.com

Selain DOAJ terdapat beberapa indeking serupa:

 Directory of Research Journals Indexing  www.drji.org
 CABELL’S Directories  http://www.cabells.com

Other providers documents, papers and essays?

 EDU Libs  https://edulibs.org
 ISSUU  http://issuu.com
Modified from Tole S, Rakornas APTIKOM, 2016
1. Find the Area and build Idea
2. Writing Proposal
 Road-map
 Methodology
3. Secured Funding
4. Do the Research
5. Research output
 Prototype
 Patent
 Paper publication
1. Journal Paper
2. Conference Paper
3. Book (edited & author)
4. Book Chapter
1. (Literature) Review paper
2. Conceptual paper
3. Experimental paper
Literature Conceptual Experimental
Review paper paper paper

Weak Medium Strong

 Not Always, depend on  Proof of Concept

how do you cook it  Proof of Existence
 Ex.: SEM (Structural
Equation Modeling) -  Proof of performance
SPSS - Amos
 Area vs Idea

 Searching the seed topic in the High

Impact Factor Journals (in ISI WoS or
Scopus) or use Google Scholar, IEEE
Xplore, Open Access Journals, etc.
 Determining the Research Target:
• Not a stagnant research area (too old and many
researchers)
• Not a new field but hard to grow (small & too
specific number of researchers)
• Search a new and fast growing field (based on
publications and labs, new field and fast
growing researchers)
EXAMPLE IEEE-
JOURNAL RANK (2004)
EXAMPLE IEEE-JOURNAL
RANK (2004)
1. How to find a strong problem
2. Understanding the Problem Domain
3. Thinking of Contribution
1. Finding Core Research Papers

2. Reading Research Papers

3. Writing Critical Reports

4. Build a Mind Mapping

5. Positioning: using table (as a part of state of the art literature

review)
 Why do we have to read good papers?
› The quality of your writing depends on the
quality of your reading.

 Failure of reading a good paper can bring you

to failure in understanding the problem domain,
the strong solution, the strong methods, etc.
 Read only a good paper, but how to find a good
paper?

 Can we set-up a framework in our mind (structured

thinking ) even before we read a paper

 Join the communication among the researchers in

a specific research area, by reading and try to find
a way to improve their research work. If the idea to
improve it is a good idea, then publish it.

 What is the best way to read papers?

 Find the most important thing in the paper, but what is it?
 Source of idea for project
› Scientific literature, own observations, other
individuals expert, etc.
 Literature review
› Read literature
› Integrate & cross reference ideas
› Critically evaluate & discuss ideas
 Formulate research questions
› Consider theoretical foundations
› Refine project idea (identify constructs
 Select methodological approach
› Descriptive
 Select way to study phenomenon of interest
(survey, case study, naturalistic observation)
› Experimental
 Identify and formulate the hypotheses
› Correlational
 Identify specific variables of interest (predict
nature of relationship)
 Normally about 30% (in USA, UK, etc.)
 Turnitin, Viber, iAuthenticate, etc.
 To make it safe: 15% exclusing the
references or 20% including reference
1. Type of Research Papers
2. Finding the research field
› Area and Idea
3. Searching the seed topic
4. Determine the research target
5. Define a research problem
6. Research methodology formulation
Contraints:
 Budget: Free or low cost, location
 Time of publishing

Type of publications:
1. Journal Paper – Scopus (SCImago)
2. Conference Paper - IEEE Xplore, ACM-DL
 Scopus
3. Book (editor & author) – Elsevier  Scopus
4. Book Chapter – Elsevier  Scopus
• Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers
http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20fo
r%20publishers%20FINAL_1_0.pdf

• Principles of Transparency and Best

Practice in Scholarly Publishing
http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles%20of%20Transparen
cy%20and%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Scholarly%20Publishing.
pdf

From: COPE - Committee on Publication Ethics.

Sample of debatting for journal paper in using COPE`: here

Sample of answer: here
https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-
2015.pdf
https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/

 Jurnal predator definition is debatable.

 Someone asked: I wonder why you have not added these
Predatory Publishers in your list yet
* Plos
* Hindawi
* Elsevier
 Hindawi was in Beall’s list (2012?)
 Now, some countries realease their own list (list in the next
page).
Now, some countries realease their own list, example:

Australia: http://www.arc.gov.au/era-2015-submitted-journal-list
download:
http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ERA/ERA%202015/ERA20
15_Submitted_Journal_ListV2.xlsx

Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by Malaysia Ministry of Education (MOE)

http://epsas.upm.edu.my/psasrip/images/pdf2015/publishers.pdf
http://zetty1977.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/6/4/26648302/blacklisted_journal_by_m
oe.pdf

Iran: (Black List)

http://ceit.aut.ac.ir/autcms/news/newsDetail.htm?id=1777500177&depurl=comput
er-engineering&lang=en&cid=1865

Thailand: (Approved)
http://www.elearning.au.edu/publications/

Pakistan: (Recognised)
http://www.hec.gov.pk/insidehec/divisions/qali/qadivision/pages/hecrecognizedj
ournals.aspx
Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by UPM
http://epsas.upm.edu.my/psasrip/images/pdf2015/publishers.pdf

ITB: (Black List)

https://www.itb.ac.id/files/12/20131121/BlacklistedPublishers-
and-theirRespectiveJournals.pdf
Jurnal yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan untuk Kenaikan
Pangkat/Jabatan Dosen
http://pak.dikti.go.id/portal/?p=41

Daftar Jurnal yang Masuk Blacklist Tim PAK Dikti

http://www.kopertis12.or.id/2014/04/11/daftar-jurnal-yang-
masuk-blacklist-tim-pak-dikti.html

(Sayangnya tidak di update, 2013).

 Scimago
 Science Direct
 Emerald
 IGI Global
 Hindawi
 IEEE Xplore
 Etc.
Contoh hasil hasil penelitian:

Surelator: Optimal Quality Translation from Bahasa

Indonesia to English (vice versa)
 Indonesia has 722 living language + 1 official language used by
more than 240 million people (Lewis, 2009).
 Estimated only less than 10% Indonesian has the capability in a
reasonable level of English.
 Research on machine translation has been done extensively for
certain languages such as English, Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and
French but not in Bahasa Indonesia.
 Currently we have developed our own good quality corpus from
multi domain (3 millions words parallel corpus).

 28 parameters have been studied including language modelling (3),

n-gram (8 parameters), alighment (9 parameters), and reordering (8
parameters) producing ~270 millions experiments to find the optimal
quality translation (Noted: an experiments took between 2-9 hours).
SURELATOR Performance
Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and
SURElator
SURELATOR Performance
Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and
SURElator
SURELATOR Performance
Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator

The latest result

Scheme (NIST) NIST BLEU Time

Google 7.2177 0.2697 8

Rekso 3.8365 0.0726 196
Surelator 8.5465 0.4023 29 Indonesian to English
Speed
Surelator 8.4962 0.4230 75 Scheme NIST BLEU Time
Quality (NIST)
Google 7.3531 0.2875 8
Rekso 4.1575 0.0860 135
Surelator 8.5842 0.4032 23
Speed
Surelator 8.7183 0.4181 87
Quality
Interactive Peer-Tracking Framework for Hajj Pilgrims
 PROBLEM ANALYSIS

1. The number of people who went to the Hajj pilgrimage in 2006 is 2,130,594,
where 73% of the pilgrims are non-saudi pilgrims [1].

2. In 2010, 64.27% (1,799,601) of total 2.8 million pilgrims were non Saudi [2].
3. In 2011, 62,44% (1,828,195) of total pilgrims [3].

4. In Indonesia, hajj quota has been reduced by 20%, from the original quota of
211,000 pilgrims (2013) [5] and Increase again to 168.800 in 2014 [6]. In
Malaysia, Hajj Quota is increased to 28,000 in 2011 from 26,000 in 2010 [4]
and decrease to 22,320 in 2014.

5. More than 2,500 cases of missing people in the area of Masjid al-Haram, the
grand mosque in Makkah, during Ramadan 2005. Increasing 14% each year
and many more are not reported [1] for umrah only, and for Hajj, it is
estimated 4 times of cases of missing people.

6. It is estimated more than 30 people die everyday during Hajj peak time, most
of them are elderly. [1] Statistic released by Ministry of Hajj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), 2006.
[2] Framework for Hajj Pilgrimage Tracking System in a Pervasive Computing
Environment. IJMCMC, IGI Global, July 2011.
[3] Information office of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia in Washington DC, 2011.
[4] Hajj Quota for Malaysian pilgrims to 28,000, the Star Online.
[5] Jakarta post, available at http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/indonesia-hajj-quota-slashed-by-
20/.
[6] Antara News, http://www.antaranews.com/berita/455840/seluruh-jamaah-haji-indonesia-tuntas-ke-
tanah-suci
 AIMS AND BENEFITS

Mainly HajjLocator has two aims:

1- To reduce worrying (peace of mind). Provide a

tracking facility to the users when they perform hajj,
for their family in their home country.

2- To save life. Provide carefully designed SOS

button, when a user (especially elderly) in panic
situation.
 HajjLocator Framework ver 1.0

HajjLocator framework Client-side application

interface
The design on how the internet technology can help to reduce worrying and save a live.
 HajjLocator Setting

Running the test on

SmartPhone

Location projection in Makkah

HajjLocator Client surroundings for user testing
application interface purpose
 Key Features of Reliable Emergency Communication
Infrastructure Model

Key Feature for a Reliable Emergency Communication for

the Server and Mobile client apps.:

1. Tracking user based on time, 9. History of user location

distance and user request. (google map)
2. SOS Tracking and SOS 10. Text Based Monitoring
11. SMS notification of user
Saved
location
3. SOS button
12. SMS triggering for
4. Life Update peers/family
5. Geolocation (Single/multiple 13. Update multi-user location
users and User Distribution) (google map)
6. Geo-Fencing 14. Silent call function
7. Update History (With 15. Speeding detection
Filtering) 16. Control remotely
8. Auto-reboot

75
 Tracking User Based on Time, Distance and User Request

Example:

Tracking user based on

time (yellow), distance
(blue) and user request
(red).

76
Tracking User Based on Time and Distance

Comparison of actual GPS coordinates in

location test bed in the university and Makkah
 Geofence

SMS or others massaging system is currently used

for user when it comes or goes to a fence
Award for HajjLocator so far:
1. Gold Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition – IRIIE 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2. Gold Medal - Innovation Showcase in the International Conference on Research and Innovation in
Information Systems – ICRIIS 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3. WIAF 2013 winner, on category “Software Engineering of Merit”, the 2nd Annual 2013 World Inventor
Award Festival, Seoul, Korea.
4. ISIF 2012 Award Winner, 1st rank, on Community Choice Award on category Code for the Common Good.
5. Gold medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition - IRIIE 2012, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
6. Silver Medal - Malaysia Technology Expo - MTE 2011, Kuala Lumpur Convention Center, 17-19 February
2011.
7. Silver Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition 2011 - IRIIE 2011, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia.
Thakn yuo for yrou atteniton…

teddy@ieee.org