Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 18

Ethics

What is Ethics?

The field of ethics, also called moral


philosophy, involves systematizing,
defending, and recommending
concepts of right and wrong behavior.
Types of Ethical Studies
1. Concepts in Ethics
A. Objectivism
B. Relativism
C. Psychological Issues
i. egoism vs. altruism
ii. emotion vs. reason
2. Normative Ethics
A. Virtue theories
B. Duty theories
C. Consequentialist theories
i. ethical egoism
ii. ethical altruism
iii. utilitarianism
Concepts in Ethics
Two major concepts in ethics involve discovering
specifically whether moral values are eternal truths
that exist in a spirit-like realm or rather human
conventions.

Objectivism - eternal truths, spiritual


1 +1 = 2 Here, ethical rules are laws that are unchanging as
physical objects.

Relativism - created by humans


Either invented by the individual or with the approval of a
specific culture. It changes between individuals or cultures.
Psychological Issues
1. Concepts in Ethics • Egoism vs. Altruism
A. Objectivism An egoist would argue
B. Relativism that selfishness and
C. Psychological Issues pleasure motivate our
i. egoism vs. altruism actions though we do have
ii. emotion vs. reason the capacity to show, and
sometimes practice,
benevolence toward
others.
Psychological Issues
1. Concepts in Ethics • Egoism vs. Altruism
A. Objectivism An altruist insists that
B. Relativism that selfishness and
C. Psychological Issues pleasure should not
i. egoism vs. altruism motivate our actions. He
ii. emotion vs. reason or she would instead put
the benefit of others’
before themselves in every
situation.
Psychological Issues
1. Concepts in Ethics • Emotion vs. Reason
A. Objectivism All of our moral choices
B. Relativism are, or at least can be,
C. Psychological Issues backed by some reason or
justification. In an
i. egoism vs. altruism academic setting,
ii. emotion vs. reason acknowledging the
reasons for an ethical
decision is essential in
order to have discussion.
The Role of Reason
If I claim that it is wrong to steal someone's
car, then I should be able to justify my
claim with some kind of argument.
For example, stealing Smith's car is wrong . . .
Why?
since this would upset her, violate her
ownership rights, or put the thief at risk of
getting caught.
How Do I Apply Ethics?
1. Concepts in Ethics
A. Objectivism
B. Relativism
C. Psychological Issues
i. egoism vs. altruism
ii. emotion vs. reason
2. Normative Ethics
A. Virtue theories
B. Duty theories
C. Consequentialist theories
i. ethical egoism
ii. ethical altruism
iii. utilitarianism
Normative Ethics
Normative ethics takes on a practical task,
which is to arrive at moral standards that
regulate right and wrong conduct.

Why is it important for us, as a society, to


arrive at moral standards that regulate
right and wrong conduct?
3 Theories of Normative Ethics
1. Concepts in Ethics
A. Objectivism
B. Relativism
C. Psychological issues
i. egoism vs. altruism
ii. emotion vs. reason
2. Normative Ethics
A. Virtue theories
B. Duty theories
C. Consequentialist theories
i. ethical egoism
ii. ethical altruism
iii. utilitarianism
Duty
Many of us feel that there are clear obligations we
have as human beings, such as to care for our
children, and to not commit murder.

These principles are obligatory, irrespective of the


consequences that might follow from our actions.

For example, it is wrong to not care for our


children even if neglecting them results in some
great benefit, such as financial savings.
What are some examples of things we do out of duty?
Duty theories do recognize that duties will come into
conflict.
Duty to keep your promise
Duty not to bring harm to others

I borrow my neighbor's gun and promise to return it when he


asks for it. What am I obligated to do?
One day, in a fit of rage, my neighbor pounds on my door and
asks for the gun so that he can take vengeance on someone.
Am I still obligated to return the gun?
On the one hand, the duty to keep promises obligates me to
return the gun; on the other hand, the duty of not injuring
others obligates me to avoid injuring others and thus not
return the gun. Which is more important?
In this case, my duty to not injure others emerges as the most
important duty, and I should not return the gun.
Focus on the Consequences
1. Concepts in Ethics
A. Objectivism
B. Relativism
C. Psychological Issues
i. egoism vs. altruism
ii. emotion vs. reason
2. Normative Ethics
A. Virtue theories
B. Duty theories
C. Consequentialist theories
i. ethical egoism
ii. ethical altruism
iii. utilitarianism
Consequentialist
• Ethical Egoism: an action is morally right if
the consequences of that action are more
favorable than unfavorable only to the agent
performing the action.
• Ethical Altruism: an action is morally right if
the consequences of that action are more
favorable than unfavorable to everyone except
the agent.
• Utilitarianism: an action is morally right if the
consequences of that action are more
favorable than unfavorable to everyone.
An Example
A woman was traveling through a developing country
when she witnessed a car in front of her run off the road
and roll over several times. She asked the hired driver to
pull over to assist, but, to her surprise, the driver
accelerated nervously past the scene. A few miles down
the road the driver explained that in his country if someone
assists an accident victim, then the police often hold the
assisting person responsible for the accident itself. If the
victim dies, then the assisting person could be held
responsible for the death. The driver continued explaining
that road accident victims are therefore usually left
unattended and often die from exposure to the country's
harsh desert conditions.
What should she do? What is the most ethical decision?
• Ethical egoism - the woman in this illustration would
only be concerned with the consequences of her
attempted assistance as she would be affected. Clearly,
the decision to drive on would be the morally proper
choice.
• Ethical altruism- she would be concerned only with the
consequences of her action as others are affected,
particularly the accident victim. Tallying only those
consequences reveals that assisting the victim would be
the morally correct choice, irrespective of the negative
consequences that result for her.
• Utilitarianism, she must consider the consequences for
both herself and the victim. The outcome here is less
clear, and the woman would need to precisely calculate
the overall benefit versus disbenefit of her action.
Dive in!
• Advertising alcoholic beverages to minors

• Stopping at the scene of an accident

• Not advertising high-calorie cereals that


normally appeal to children.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi