Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Vision 2030 and Industry Standards Infusion

ASME Committee on Engineering Education


ASME Council on Standards & Certification

Kenneth R. Balkey, PE
Mohammad H. Hosni, PhD
Thomas J. Perry, PE

1 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development


Vision 2030 and Industry Standards
Infusion
Objective of Effort
To globally incorporate industry standards in 4-year Mechanical
Engineering and 2-year/4-year Mechanical Engineering
Technology programs

Contents of Presentation
• Reasons for Industry Standards Infusion
• Initial Standards Modules
• Initial Faculty/Industry Standards Expert Teams
• Organization
• Next Steps
• Potential Long Term Goal and Schedule
2 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development
Reasons For Industry
Standards Infusion
ASME Vision 2030 Advocacy and Strategy
1. Richer practice-based experience needs to include the infusion of
industry codes and standards
2. Stronger professional skills
3. More flexible curricula
4. Greater innovation and creativity
5. Technical depth specialization at graduate level
6. New balance of faculty industry practice skills
Additional Reasons to Include Industry Standards in Education
1. Industry managers, early career engineers, & educators agree on need;
Students are seeking standards knowledge as part of their education
2. Recent ASME work in ABET accreditation (ME/MET) has resulted in
new industry standards education requirements
3. Opportunity for knowledge transfer to address aging workforce
3 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development
Initial Standards Modules to Infuse in
Undergraduate Engineering Courses
Engineering Module from ASME
Year Design Track Method
Course Standard

Freshman Hands-on activity; Introduction to Introduction to Codes, Adapt material from


take mechanical Engineering Standards, and Regulations existing ASME
component apart & Assessment Based
review against Code Course
(e.g., hand tool,
small valve)(*)
Sophomore Manufacturing (*) ASME B31.1 / B31.3 Piping Build module from
Mechanics of Codes or ASME Boiler & existing ASME courses
Pressure Vessel Code and existing university
Materials
applicable to many industries courses
2
Junior Machine Design (*) Fluid Mechanics / ASME OM Part 28 System Adapt material from
Heat Transfer Performance and MFC Stds / existing Pitt course and
(TBD) Heat Transfer (TBD) MFC Fluid Flow Stds
3
Senior Senior Capstone Design Project (*)Range of ASME standards Define and use Case
(1-2 Semesters) through the four years – e.g., Studies working with
B107 Hand Tools, B16 Valves, industry support and
Y14.5 Manufacturing, B31.1/3 possible partners
Piping, ASME BPVC I/III/VIII
1

4 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development


Initial Faculty/Industry Standards
Expert Teams Being Formed
Team 1 – Design Track/Sr. Capstone Design
1 Faculty Experts – Standards Experts –

Patsy Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute Daniel Eggert, Snap-On, Inc.(B107 Hand Tools)
Kathryn Wingate, Georgia Tech Don Frikken , Becht Engineering Co.(B16 Valves)
Wayne Whiteman, Georgia Tech Patrick McCuistion, Multimac (Ohio University)(Y14 GD&T)
Cheng Lin, Old Dominion Univ. Brian Parry, Parry Engineering(Boeing)(B89 Dimensional Metrology)
Chittaranjan Sahay, Univ. of Hartford Ron Haupt, Pressure Piping Engineering Assoc Inc (B31.1 Power Piping Code)
Dave Schmidt , Univ. of Pittsburgh Don Frikken, Becht Engineering Co. (B31.3 Process Piping Code)
Dave Roarty/John Gregg, Westinghouse Electric Company (BPV Section III Code)
Stuart Cameron, Strathclyde University(Doosan Babcock)(BPV Section I Code)

Team 2 – Mechanics of Materials Standards Experts –


2 Faculty Experts –
Ron Haupt, Pressure Piping Engineering Assoc Inc (B31.1 Power Piping Code)
Wayne Whiteman, Georgia Tech Don Frikken, Becht Engineering Co. (B31.3 Process Piping Code)
Dave Roarty/John Gregg, Westinghouse Electric Company (BPV Section III Code)

Team 3 – Fluid Mechanics/Heat Standards Experts –


3 Faculty Experts -
Steve Swantner, Westinghouse Electric Company(ASME OM Code - Part 28)
Kevin Wanklyn, Kansas State David Wyatt , Wyatt Engineering (MFC Fluid Flow Standard)
Emily Boyd, Washington University George Mattingly, Catholic University of American (MFC Fluid Flow Standard)

5 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development


Organization of ASME Joint Education and
Industry Standards Task Force

Council on
Standards and
Certification

Committee on Board on
Engineering Strategic
Education Initiatives

Joint Education and


Industry Standards
Task Force

Module 1 Module 2 Module n


Task Team Task Team Task Team

6 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development


What’s next?
Continue to develop overall plan that effectively utilizes appropriate
resources of ASME and relevant partners in terms of content, subject
matter experts (volunteer and staff), and delivery mechanisms to
reach and impact as many students as practical worldwide

Initial faculty and S&C volunteer teams being formed to develop the
first standards modules primarily over the summer semester

Interface with NIST established to seek and obtain external funding to


complement ASME support (Estimate $40K-$50K for faculty travel and
two-week stipends)

Contact:
Tom Perry, Engineering Education
perryt@asme.org or +1 212 591 7234 for further information
7 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development
Potential Long Term Goal and
Schedule
Potential Goal
Incorporate industry standards to reach 150,000 ME/MET students
in the U.S. plus students in 20 other countries

Schedule
To test the use of the standards education material –
– Form Pilot Users Group
– Scale to at least 50 schools (prior to full dissemination)
– Two year period

8 Setting the Standard for Workforce Development

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi