Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 33

MSE and Rock Strength

Calculations

Presenter Name
(18pt Arial)
MSE and Rock Strength Calculations

▌ Introduction

▌ How can rock resistance be correlated with surface drilling


parameters?

▌ Examples of MSE Use

▌ Revisiting MSE Equation and Reducing it To a Straight Line

▌ UCS Distribution for TSIMIN-XUX’s Project Divided By Formation

▌ Conclusion

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2
Introduction
▌ MSE is the total energy that we need to input so we can remove a
certain volume of rock:

𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 𝑰𝒏𝒑𝒖𝒕


𝑴𝑺𝑬 =
𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅

𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 𝑰𝒏𝒑𝒖𝒕 𝑺𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚 𝑰𝒏𝒑𝒖𝒕


𝑴𝑺𝑬 = +
𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅

𝑾𝑶𝑩∗Δ𝒉 𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆∗𝟐π∗#𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔


𝑴𝑺𝑬 = +
𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂∗Δ𝒉 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂∗Δ𝒉

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 3
Introduction
▌ The distance traveled by the bit (Δ𝒉) during a given time, is the
penetration per time (ROP) divided by rotations per time, we have:

𝑹𝑶𝑷
Δ𝒉 =
𝑹𝑷𝑴
▌ MSE equation, then, becomes (in PEMEX units):
𝟏 π∗𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆∗𝑹𝑷𝑴
𝑴𝑺𝑬 = 𝟐𝟐𝟎𝟒. 𝟔𝟐 ∗ 𝑾𝑶𝑩 + 𝟑𝟔. 𝟓𝟖 ∗
𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝑹𝑶𝑷

▌ Where:

Area  Cross sectional area of the well (in2)


WOB  Weight on Bit (mTon)
Torque  Surface torque (ft.lbf)
ROP  Rate of Penetration (m/hr)

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 4
How can rock resistance be
correlated with surface drilling
parameters?

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 5
How can rock resistance be correlated with surface drilling
parameters?

𝑹𝒐𝒄𝒌 𝑼𝑪𝑺
𝑴𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝑬𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒚 =
𝑴𝑺𝑬

Improved efficiency
leads to a higher
potential ROP until a
A most effective technical limit
system would reach a
minimum MSE to
perform the job until
a technical limit

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 6
MSE Easy to implement
Advantage RT code

Single Parameter to
base your design

You can identify changes in drilling


mechanics using the trend behavior Can be extrapolated to
other fields

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 7
Depends on surface data
MSE quality and availability!!
Limitations

High Values, that could lead to


loss of physical meaning

Its power relies on a


database Needs a learning curve

In some cases
data needs to be
treated
TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 8
Examples

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 9
Lakach-11 – 12 ¼”
▌ On this well we had a cored bit due to bad practices while drilling
through accessories and shoe.

The bit had suffered a loss of integrity at the


cone that was propagated from the inside to
outside.

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 10
Lakach-11 - MSE

Despite the good


ROP, the system is
consuming more
energy than
expected

The energy that


could be used for
creating more ROP
was being
dissipated trough
vibration

Avg. MSE 91 kpsi


Avg. ROP 13.04 m/h
TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 11
Lakach-32 – 12 ¼” – High JIF in Soft Formation

▌ On High ROP wells, energy can be dissipated through cuttings being


“regrinded”.
▌ In order to improve the cuttings to be “expelled” from the bit face, we
placed the bigger nozzles on the inner part of the bit.

This arrangement was


also to reduce the risk of
hole washout and
improve the impact
pressure

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 12


Lakach-32 - MSE

No Vibration!

53% Higher ROP


70% Less Energy

Avg. MSE 28 kpsi


Avg. ROP 24.6 m/h

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 13
XUX 24 V2 - 12 ¼”

No Vibration! This
well can be used
as a basis for
future analysis. On
this field.

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 14
TSIMIN-26 – 8 ½”

Pay attention on
the high MSE
values due to a
high rock
compressibility

Avg. MSE
770 kpsi

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 15
TSIMIN-26 – 8 ½”

Avg. MSE for


TSIMIN-26

Target ROP

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 16
This was a run in
TSIMIN-52 where
we used an insert
bit. We were on
its maximum
specs.
TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretacic and Jurassic
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 17
Revisiting MSE Equation and
Reducing it To a Straight Line

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 18
Revisiting MSE Equation and Reducing it To a Straight Line

▌ How can we reduce MSE so will affect the ROP? To know this, we
must revisit MSE’s equation This one also
affects the
performance, but,
𝟏 π∗𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆∗𝑹𝑷𝑴 needs to be
𝑴𝑺𝑬 = 𝟐𝟐𝟎𝟒. 𝟔𝟐 ∗ 𝑾𝑶𝑩 + 𝟑𝟔. 𝟓𝟖 ∗
𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝑹𝑶𝑷 evaluated in
order to be out of
some vibrational
window

𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆 = 𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑶𝒇𝒇 + 𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑫𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈


WOB and torque
are related!!!!

This one affects


TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 19
the performance
Revisiting MSE Equation and Reducing it To a Straight Line

𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑫𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈

Hamrick, Robert - PhD


Boghdady – Journal of Thesis, 2011
Engineering Sciences,
2010
Caicedo et al –
AADE 2005
Heye-Meyer, B. et al –
IADC/SPE 2010

Torque can be
correlated with WOB by
a straight line
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 20
Revisiting MSE Equation and Reducing it To a Straight Line
1 𝜋∗𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒∗𝑅𝑃𝑀
𝑀𝑆𝐸 = 2204.62 ∗ 𝑊𝑂𝐵 + 36.58 ∗
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑅𝑂𝑃

WOB
x
Torque
Correlation

𝑦 = 𝛼𝑥 − 1

𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎∗𝑀𝑆𝐸∗𝛾 β ∆𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒
𝛼= 𝒚+=𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒∴𝒙 =∴
𝑂𝑓𝑓 𝛾=
2204.62 𝑹𝑶𝑷 𝑊𝑂𝐵
𝟏

∆𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆+𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑶𝒇𝒇
36.58 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 𝑅𝑃𝑀
𝛽=
2204.62
TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 21
Revisiting MSE Equation and Reducing it To a Straight Line

𝒚 = 𝛂𝒙 − 𝟏
y Rotating off
Target bottom. No
ROP ROP
Decrease in
Physical RPM. Needs Increase in
Meaning of more torque RPM. Needs
this Equation less torque

𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 ∗ 𝑴𝑺𝑬 ∗ 𝜸
𝛂= + 𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑶𝒇𝒇
𝟐𝟐𝟎𝟒. 𝟔𝟐

𝟑𝟔.𝟓𝟖∗π∗𝑹𝑷𝑴 ∆𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆
𝜷= ∴ 𝜸=
𝟐𝟐𝟎𝟒.𝟔𝟐 𝑾𝑶𝑩

𝟏 𝟏
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 𝒙𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 22
∆𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒙 + 𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑶𝒇𝒇
𝒙𝒎𝒂𝒙 =
𝑻𝒐𝒓𝒒𝒖𝒆𝑶𝒇𝒇 x
UCS Distribution Divided By
Formation

TSIMIN-XUX Workshop – Drilling through Cretaceous and Jurassic


© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 23
UCS Distribution for TSIMIN-XUX Project Divided
By Ages
▌ Recalling that on TSIMIN-XUX’s Project, for the
8 ½” phase, we have the following formation
division:
▌ Where between the end of Paleocen and
Upper Cretaceous we can usually find a
sedimentary breccia constituted by mudstone
to wackstone.
▌ Occasionally we can find silex nodules
(pedernal) within Cretaceous.

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 24


breccia
TSIMIN-1
TSIMIN-1 (RKB= 32m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4504 4536 4537 76 19.8 11.31 29.33
Pi -4580 4612 4613 48 21.4 9.78 21.38
Ksb -4628 4660 4661 43 37.8 2.26 5.9
Ks -4671 4703 4704 79 29.1 30.8 5.47 5.39 11.82 10.05
Km -4750 4782 4783 119 38.6 1.72 5.78
Ki -4869 4901 4902 47 40.1 1.18 4.49
JST -4916 4948 4949 290 30.2 5.57 9.48
JSK -5206 5238 5240

UCSxN-D Porosity cross plot


where we can see a good
correlation between porosity
and rock compressibility

In average, we have an
increase of 2.1 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
porosity
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 25
TSIMIN-6
TSIMIN-6 (RKB= 33.66m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4839 4873 4951 79 14.4 NA 12.1
Pi -4918 4952 5035 30 15.6 NA 13.95
Ksb -4948 4982 5067 9 37.2 NA 2.61
Ks -4957 4991 5077 54 21.4 NA 10.13
31.7 NA 6.53
Km -5011 5045 5134 110 33.1 NA 4.26
Ki -5122 5155 5252 74 33.4 NA 4.14
JST -5196 5229 5331 457 29.2 NA 6.09
Ki -5652 5686 5810 29.0 NA 6.16

UCSxSonic Porosity cross


plot where we can see a good
correlation between porosity
and rock compressibility

We don’t have Neutron-


Density Data for this well

In average, we have an
increase of 1.9 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 26
porosity
TSIMIN-12
TSIMIN-12 (RKB= 33.5m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4696 4729 4977 95 36.5 2.22 4.24
Pi -4775 4809 5072 57 37.8 2.22 4.29
Ksb -4823 4857 5129 52 36.8 2.39 5.17
Ks -4868 4901 5181 94 30.9 34.5 4.63 3.25 8.11 5.89
Km -4950 4983 5275 112 32.4 4.09 7.1
Ki -5049 5082 5387 56 NA NA NA
JST -5097 5130 5443 231 NA NA NA
JSK -5299 5332 5674

UCSxN-D Porosity cross plot


where we can see a good
correlation between porosity
and rock compressibility

In average, we have an
increase of 2.8 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 27
porosity
TSIMIN-14
TSIMIN-14 (RKB= 41.6m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4748 4790 4965 72 14.2 12.79 18.22
Pi -4821 4862 5043 51 18.1 9.65 16.78
Ksb -4872 4913 5099 78 38.1 1.88 3.36
Ks -4949 4991 5184 115 31.2 29.6 4.43 5.06 10.16 9.83
Km -5064 5106 5309 101 36.1 2.36 8.31
Ki -5165 5207 5419 66 38.6 1.73 3.84
JST -5232 5273 5492 298 26.9 5.95 10.83
JSK -5529 5571 5818

In average, we have an
increase of 2.3 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
porosity

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 28


TSIMIN-16
TSIMIN-16 (RKB= 37m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -5042 5079 5153 98 15.8 12.94 NA
Pi -5140 5177 5258 43 23.3 8.9 NA
Ksb -5183 5220 5304 22 34.5 3.25 NA
Ks -5205 5242 5327 105 29.4 29.9 5.32 5.58 NA NA
Km -5310 5347 5439 173 36.9 2.44 NA
Ki -5483 5520 5624 60 37.6 2.06 NA
JST -5543 5580 5687 243 28.7 6.06 NA
JSK -5786 5823 5940

In average, we have an
increase of 2 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
porosity

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 29


TSIMIN-17
TSIMIN-17 (RKB= 39m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4431 4470 4555 80 17.4 13.2 22.73
Pi -4511 4550 4643 47 25.9 7.43 20.04
Ksb -4558 4597 4694 51 40.2 1.1 4.47
Ks -4609 4648 4749 68 29.8 31.7 5.13 5.06 9.76 9.35
Km -4677 4716 4824 110 37.2 2.21 6.06
Ki -4787 4826 4944 43 40.3 1.07 2.62
-4830 4869 4991 27 35.7 2.95 2.91
JST
-4857 4896 5020

In average, we have an
increase of 2.2 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
porosity

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 30


TSIMIN-37
TSIMIN-37 (RKB= 42.45m)
Age
TVDSS TVD MD Thickness UCS (kpsi) Avg. UCS (kpsi) ND Porosity Avg. Porosity Sonic Porosity Avg. Porosity
Ps -4623 4665 4783 85 9.5 NA 17.34
Pi -4708 4750 4875 50 9.1 NA 17.11
Ksb -4758 4800 4929 42 33.9 NA 3.91
Ks -4800 4842 4975 88 18.2 23.8 NA NA 11.6 8.87
Km -4888 4930 5071 137 32.1 NA 4.76
Ki -5024 5067 5220 42 34.1 NA 3.84
JST -5066 5109 5266 233 25.7 NA 7.68
JSK -5300 5342 5520

UCSxSonic Porosity cross


plot where we can see a good
correlation between porosity
and rock compressibility

In average, we have an
increase of 2 kpsi of UCS for
each 1 pu decrease in
porosity
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 31
UCS x Age
Results
45

40

35

30
TSIMIN-1
TSIMIN-6
UCS (kpsi)

25
TSIMIN-12
TSIMIN-14
20
TSIMIN-16
TSIMIN-17
15
TSIMIN-37

10

0
© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 33
Ps Pi Ksb Ks Km Ki JST
Conclusions

▌ With rock UCS up to 40 kpsi, in order to at least maintain the ROP, we


need to be more aggressive by applying high wob.
▌ Due to the high rock compressibility, high peaks of shocks can be
observed while drilling, so, a good manner to improve the efficiency of
the energy that is being applied is also reduce these high peaks.
▌ Peaks of shocks are not predictable when they are not connected with
vibrations, to be reduced the kinetic energy of the system must be
reduced in order to not be converted into high shocks, indicating that
we need a system to be able to deliver low RPM and high torque.
▌ Low RPM and high torque can lead to accumulation of elastic energy
that would be converted into kinetic energy. This indicates that we
need a system to be able to decouple this stick-and-slip environment
from the drilling.

© 2014 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 37

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi