Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INDIVIDUAL STRENGTH
CHAPTER 9
OBJECTIVES
• The focus of the instruments is on qualities pertinent to normal range of human functioning.
• Examples: locus of control, responsibility, attachment style and faith maturation.
BROAD BAND TESTS OF NORMAL SPECTRUM
- Published in 1962
- Forced choice, self-report inventory
- Three kind of forms:
• The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) Step I is based on Carl Jung’s theory of psychological type. It
indicates your personality preferences in four dimensions:
• the opposite ends of each polarity are simple different modes of being that may have a variety of
implications for relationships, vocation, leadership and personal functioning
• possessing the qualities of one polarity or the other may be advantageous (or not) in different
situations
• not equally represented in the general population
• some types are more common in specific occupational groups
• Extraversion is important in education
CALIFORNIA PSYCHOLOGICAL INVENTORY (CPI)
• a true-false test
• measure normal personality
• available in two forms:CPI-434 vs CPI-260
• ease of administration and the immediacy of computer-generated
report
CALIFORNIA PSYCHOLOGICAL INVENTORY (CPI)
• It can use with the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) (Costa & McCrae,
1992).
• Form S is for self-reports whereas Form R is for outside observers.
• The item format consist of five-point ratings : strongly disagree, disagree,
neutral, agree, strongly agree.
NEO PERSONALITY INVENTORY-REVISED (NEO PI-R)
• FUNCTIONS:
1. The items assess emotional interpersonal, experiential, attitudinal, and motivational variables.
2. Validity evidence for the NEO PI-R is substantial, and it is an excellent measure of
personality that is especially useful in research.
3. The test also shows promise as a measure of clinical Psychopathology.
4. It lacks substantial validity scales─ only three items access validity.
5. The administration of the NEO PI-R assumes that subjects are cooperative and reasonably
honest.
6. The five domain scales of the NEO PI-R are each based upon six facet (trait) scales
7. They are more definite quality or ingredients and composing more general factor of
content in Big Five.
NEO-PI-R VS NEO-PI-3
NEO-PI-3 structure
• Suited for students as young as 12 years of age
• Better internal consistency and readability
ASSESSMENT OF CREATIVITY
What do we mean by
creative work? Like
definitions
most definitions of Creativity is
imaginative activity
creativity, ours
fashioned so as to
involves novelty and produce outcomes
value. The product that are both original
must be new and must and of value.
Creativity constructs new tools and (Robinson, 1999)
be given value
new outcomes – new embodiments
according to some of knowledge. It constructs new
external criteria. relationships, rules, communities
of practice and new connections –
(Gruber & Wallace, 1999) new social practices
(Knight, 2002)
CREATIVE ACHIEVEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
• The Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ; Carson, Peterson, & Higgins, 2005)
measures creative accomplishments in 10 domains: Visual Arts, Music, Dance, Architectural
Design, Creative Writing, Humor, Inventions, Scientific Discovery, Theater and Film, and
Culinary Arts.
• it focuses on significant, observable accomplishments
• Each domain has eight items, numbered 0 through 7, that represent increasing levels of
creative achievement. For all domains, the first item indicates no training, experience, or
accomplishment. For the Creative Writing domain, for example, the first item is “I do not
have training or recognized talent in this area.”
• If people endorse the first item, they receive zero points for the domain and skip to the next
one. The remaining items ask about increasingly rare levels of accomplishment that are
logically connected, so endorsing a high item implies endorsing prior items.
• People receive more points for the items involving higher accomplishment.
THE BIOGRAPHICAL INVENTORY OF CREATIVE
BEHAVIORS (BICB)
Optimists
Pessimists
• The test includes 10 items: three statements about optimism (items 1, 4 and 10), three on
pessimism (items 3, 7 and 9) and four distractor items (2, 5, 6, 8) whose scores are not
computed.
• Subjects answer the statements indicating their level of agreement on a five-point Likert
scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
• The negative scores on the test need to be inverted for the statistical analysis, so that values
close to five always indicate a higher degree of optimistic expectations of the individual.
EVIDENCE SUPPORTING LOT-R
• LOT-R has good internal consistency (alpha coefficient ranging from .70 to .80)
and their correlations test-retest are from .68 to .79 for intervals of four to 28
months (Scheier, Carver, & Bridges, 1994).
• LOT-R has strong relationships with predictive markers of results for life
orientation, which is consisting with the idea of being a good instrument to
measure optimism in relation to constructs such as self-esteem and
personality factors (Carver & Scheier, 1999, 2002).