Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 14

Methods of Data Collection

Collection of Primary data


Methods
1. Observation
2. Interview
3. Through Questionnaires
4. Through Schedules
5. Other methods which include:
 Warranty cards
 Distributor audits
 Pantry audits
 Consumer panels
 Using mechanical devices
 Through projective techniques
 Depth interviews
 Content analysis
Observation Method
• Observation becomes a scientific tool and method of data
collection for the researcher when it serves a formulated research
purpose; is systematically planned and recorded and is subject to
checks and controls on validity and reliability
• Information is sought by way of the investigator’s own direct
observation without asking the respondent.
• Structured Observation: characterised by a careful definition of the
units to be observed, the style of recording the information,
standardised conditions of observation and selection of the
pertinent data of observation.
• Unstructured observation: When observation takes place without
these characteristics.
• Participant vs non-participant observation
• Controlled vs uncontrolled observation
Interview Method
• Involves presentation of oral-verbal stimuli and reply in
terms of oral-verbal responses. Can be through
personal interviews or telephonic interviews.
• Structured vs. unstructured interviews. Structured
interviews involve the use of a set of pre-determined
questions and of highly standardised techniques of
recording. Follows a rigid procedure, asking questions
in the form and order prescribed
• Unstructured interviews do not follow a system of pre-
determined questions.
• Focussed interview, clinical interview, and non-
directive interview
Merits of interview Method
• More information and that too in greater depth can be
obtained
• Interviewer can overcome resistance if any of the
respondents
• Greater flexibility to restructure questions in case of
unstructured interviews.
• Non-response generally remains low
• Interviewer can decide who will answer the questions.
Group discussions can also be held
• Language can be adopted to suit the educational level of
the person being interviewed
• Can collect personal information of the respondent’s
personal characteristics to help to interpret results
Weaknesses of the interview Method
• May be very expensive when large and geographically
spread sample is taken
• Possibility of the bias of the interviewer and the
respondent
• Respondents in high positions may not be easily accessible
• More time consuming
• Selection, training and supervising the field staff is more
complex
• May introduce systematic errors
• Rapport between interviewer and respondent may be
difficult to achieve.
Telephonic Interviews
• More flexible
• Faster than other methods
• Cheaper
• Recall is easy. Call backs are simple and economical
• Higher rate of response
• Replies can be recorded without embarrassment to the
respondent
• Can explain requirements more easily
• Better access to respondents who cannot be otherwise
contacted
• No field staff is required
• Representative and wider distribution of sample is possible
Demerits of telephonic interview
• Little time is given to respondents toconsider
the answer.Period not likely to exceed five
minutes
• Only people who have telephonic facility can
be accessed
• Not suitable for intensive surveys where
detailed answers are required
• Greater possibility of bias
• Questions have to be short and to the point
Through Questionnaires
• Questionnaire consists of a number of questions
printed or typed in some definite order
• Mailed to respondents who have to fill it and
return it at the earliest
• Low cost even when geographic coverage is wide
• Free from the bias of the interviewer.
• Respondents get adequate time to think
• Large samples can be made use of making results
more reliable
Demerits of Questionnaire Method
• Low rate of return of duly filled in questionnaires.
Bias due to non-response is often indeterminate.
• Less control over the questionnaire, once
dispatched.
• Possibility of ambiguous replies or omission
making interpretation difficult
• Difficult to know whether willing respondents are
representative.
• Pilot study to be conducted to increase
effectiveness of the questionnaire
Main features of a questionnaire
• General form- structured or unstructured. In
structured questionnaire, questions are definite,
pre-determined and concrete.Standardisation is
maintained to ensure that all respondents reply
to the same set of questions.
• Questions may be closed or open.
• Correct question sequence to be maintained
• Opening questions should be such as to rouse
interest in the respondents
• Easy questions should be asked first.. Questions
should go from the general to the specific.
Essentials of a good questionnaire
• Should be short and simple
• Must proceed in a logical sequence
• Personal and intimate questions should be left to the end
• Technical terms and vague expressions should be avoided
• Questions should be dichotomous,multiple choice, or open-
ended.
• There should be some control questions to ensure
reliability of the respondent
• Questions affecting sentiments of the respondents must be
avoided.
• Adequate space should be provided to give the answers
• Physical appearance must attract the respondent
Collection of data through schedules
• Schedules are filled in by the enumerators
themselves. Selection of the right type of
enumerators is very important.
• Enumerators should be well trained,
intelligent, honest sincere, hard working and
have patience.
• Useful in extensive enquiries but more
expensive .
Other methods
• Warranty cards
• Distributor or store audits.
• Pantry audits
• Consumer panels
• Use of mechanical devices

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi