Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Injuries
PRA 635
CMT and Case Management
Acromioclavicluar Separation
• Acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a diarthrodial
articulation with interposed fibrocartilaginous
meniscal disk that links the hyaline cartilage
articular surfaces of the acromial process and the
clavicle
• Joint is stabilized by a combination of dynamic
muscular and static ligamentous structures, which
allow a normal anatomic range of motion
– Because of the transverse orientation of the articulation,
direct downward forces may result in shear stresses
that cause disruption of stabilizing structures and create
displacement beyond normal limits
Acromioclavicluar Separation
• Severity of an AC separation is dependent
upon the degree of ligamentous injury
• Capsular AC ligaments and extracapsular
coracoclavicular (CC) ligament are the
primary static stabilizers of the AC joint
– Anterior and posterior AC ligaments are
predominantly responsible for maintaining
stability in AP plane
Acromioclavicluar Separation
– Two components of CC ligament, trapezoid and
conoid ligaments, provide restraint against
compression and superior-inferior translation,
respectively
– Deltoid and trapezius muscles are especially
important in providing dynamic stabilization
when these ligamentous structures are
damaged
Anatomy
Anatomy
Epidemiology
• AC joint injuries are seen especially in
competitive athletes, such as rugby or
hockey players, and occur most frequently
in the second decade of life11
• Males are more commonly affected than
females, with a male-to-female ratio of
approximately 5:111
Etiology/MOI
• M/C MOI is a direct force applied to the
superior aspect of the acromion, usually
from a fall with the arm in an adducted
position
– This impact drives the acromion inferiorly,
spraining the intra-articular AC ligaments
– If the force is great enough, the extra-articular
CC ligament may also be damaged
Etiology/MOI
• Less commonly, an indirect force may be
transmitted up the arm as a result of a fall
on an outstretched hand
– Force continues through the humeral head to
acromial process, displacing it superiorly and
stressing AC ligaments
– Coracoacromial (CA) ligaments are not injured
with this type of mechanism
AC Separation
Etiology/MOI
Classification
• Type I injuries involve sprained, but intact
CC and AC ligaments
• Type II injuries involve a complete disruption
of AC ligaments with a sprained, but intact
CC ligament
• In the more severe type III injury, both the
CC and AC structures are disrupted
Classification
• Type IV injuries are defined by posterior
displacement of the clavicle relative to
acromion with buttonholing through
trapezius muscle
• In type V injuries, clavicle is widely
displaced superiorly relative to acromion as
a result of disruption of muscle attachments
• Rare type VI injuries are characterized by
inferior displacement of the distal clavicle
below acromial process or coracoid process
Classification
Trapezius
Clinical Presentation
• Patients typically present with pain and restricted
shoulder motion after a fall
• Visual inspection of patient may also provide a
significant key to diagnosis
– Prominent clavicle with loss of normal contour of
shoulder caused by sagging of acromion is highly
suggestive of a ligamentous disruption of the AC joint
– Findings may be clearer when patient is asked to hold a
10-15 pound weight in hand of affected arm
Functional Testing
• Evaluate neurovascular status and r/o
possible clavicular fracture
• Pain during passive abduction from 90° to
180°
• Pain on passive horizontal adduction
• Resisted tests negative in chronic AC
problem
• Positive O’Brien’s test
O’Brien’s Test
Imaging
• Type V separation,
characterized by
wide displacement of
the clavicle in a
superior direction
relative to the
acromion
• Findings denote
disruption of the AC
ligaments and
coracoclavicular (CC)
ligament, as well as
deltoid attachment to
distal clavicle
Management 1
• Type I
– Rest, ice, and immobilization if it relieves pain
– Light friction massage over AC ligament
– Symptoms resolve within 7-10 days
– ↑ ROM to pain-free range
– Strengthen shoulder, especially trapezius and
deltoid muscles
– Use sling until pain subsides
Management 1
• Type II
– Treated symptomatically, but taping, bracing, or
a Kenny-Howard sling for 1-2 weeks for up to 8
weeks
– ↑ ROM to pain-free range
– Strengthen shoulder, especially trapezius and
deltoid muscles
Management 1
• Type III
– Definite support, such as Kenny-Howard sling
– Perform early ROM tests as pain ↓
– Vigorous strengthening program
Kenny-Howard Sling (AC Sling)
• http://www.tartanortho.com/AC62A2.html.pdf
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Definition
– Proposed that only in very early stages of
epicondylopathies is inflammation present
– These tendon overuse problems are
degenerative b/c no inflammatory cells are
found
– Proper term should be “tendonosis”
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Epidemiology
– Primarily b/w ages 35 and 50 years with median
age of 41 years, with a high activity level (sports
or occupational) three or more times per week
with a 30-minute or greater session11
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Pathophysiology
– Many proposed etiologies for this condition have
involved inflammatory processes of the radial humeral
bursa, synovium, periosteum, and the annular ligament
– Mechanical stress on tendons attaching to condyles
release substance P and peptides, indicating a
neurogenic inflammatory origin11
– Another proposed cause is microscopic tearing with
formation of reparative tissue (ie, angiofibroblastic
hyperplasia) in the origin of the extensor carpi radialis
brevis (ECRB) muscle
• Microtearing and repair response can lead to macroscopic
tearing and structural failure of the origin of the ECRB muscle
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Anatomy
– Most commonly involved tissue is the origin of
ECRB (100%), anterior edge extensor digitorum
communis (50% of time), and sometimes
underside of extensor carpi radialis longus
(ECRL)
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Etiology
– Any activity involving wrist extension, radial
deviation and/or supination can be associated
with overuse of the muscles originating at the
lateral epicondyle
– Tennis has been the activity most commonly
associated with the disorder, but might also
include plumbers and meat-cutters
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Clinical Presentation
– Patients present complaining of lateral elbow
and forearm pain exacerbated by use
– Most tender area is usually on anterior/inferior
portion of lateral epicondyle or slightly distal
• Often tenderness on palpation in several areas
including ECRB, ECRB or extensor digitorum
– Onset can be either acute or insidious
– Tenderness tends to improve with rest and
worsen with movements, especially wrist
extension
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Diagnosis
– Definite painful resisted wrist extension with elbow
extended
• Pressure can be added with extended forearm pronated
– May be pain and limited wrist flexion when stretching a
full flexed wrist with an extended elbow and pronated
forearm
• May be loss of passive wrist flexion associated with chronic
condition due to fibrosis
– May be pain on resisted finger extension, which usually
creates pain in the forearm mid-extensor area
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Imaging
– Radiographs can be helpful in ruling out other disorders
or concomitant intra-articular pathology (i.e.,
osteochondral loose-body, posterior osteophytes)
• Calcification in the degenerative tissue of the ECRB muscle
origin can be seen in chronic cases
– Magnetic resonance imaging can help confirm the
presence of degenerative tissue in the ECRB muscle
origin and can help diagnose concomitant pathology;
however, it is very rarely needed
Lateral Epicondylopathy
• Management
– Initial goals of ↓pain and inflammation and ↑
strength
– Light manual methods such as friction
massage, active release®, joint mobilisation,
and Graston technique®
– Stretching elbow flexion/extension, wrist
flexion/extension, forearm supination/pronation
for 30 seconds, five repetitions, three times
daily
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Carpal tunnel
syndrome (CTS) is
a collection of
characteristic
symptoms and
signs that occurs
following
entrapment of the
median nerve within
the carpal tunnel
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Incidence is 1-3 cases per
1000 subjects per year33
• Prevalence is
approximately 50 cases
per 1000 subjects in the
general population33
• Incidence may rise as high
as 150 cases per 1000
subjects per year, with
prevalence rates greater
than 500 cases per 1000
subjects in certain high-
risk groups33
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Epidemiology
– Female-to-male ratio is 3-10:133
– Peak age of development of CTS is from 45-60
years33
• Only 10% of CTS patients are younger than 31 years
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Tendons of the following muscles (not the muscles
themselves):
– Flexor digitorum profundus
– Flexor digitorum superficialis
– Flexor pollicis longus
– Some sources also include the flexor carpi radialis, but it
is more precise to state that it travels in the flexor
retinaculum which covers the carpal tunnel, rather than
running in the tunnel itself
• Nerves:
– Median nerve b/w tendons of flexor digitorum profundus
and flexor digitorum superficialis
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Pathophysiology
– Median nerve is damaged within the rigid
confines of the carpal tunnel, initially undergoing
demyelination followed by axonal degeneration
– Sensory fibers often are affected first, followed
by motor fibers
– Autonomic nerve fibers carried in the median
nerve also may be affected.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Pathophysiology
– Cause of the damage is subject to some
debate; however, it seems likely that abnormally
high carpal tunnel pressures exist in patients
with CTS
• Pressure causes obstruction to venous outflow, back
pressure, edema formation, and, ultimately, ischemia
in the nerve
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome