Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 92

Negotiable

Instruments Law
Act. 2031
Negotiable Instruments Law
Effectivity – June 2, 1911

The law is applicable only to negotiable instruments or


those instruments which meet the requirements laid
down in Section 1 of the law

Any case not provided in the law shall be governed by


existing legislation or in default thereof, by the rules
of the law merchant

The Civil Code has no effect on its provisions except to


supply any deficiency in cases not provided by the
law.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Functions of Negotiable Instruments


(1) Used as substitute for money
(2) Media of exchange for commercial
transaction
(3) Medium of credit transaction
(4) Used as evidence of the indebtedness of
the parties
Negotiable Instruments Law

Characteristics of Negotiable
Instruments
1. Negotiability - it may pass from one person to another
similar to money

2. Accumulation of secondary contracts -


secondary contracts are created when they are transferred from
one person to another
Negotiable Instruments Law

Forms of Nego Instruments


1. Promissory note (Sec. 184)
2. Bill of Exchange (Sec. 126)
3. Check (Sec. 185)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Instruments (not negotiable)


1. Letter of credit – payable to a specific person
2. Treasury warrant – payable out of a specific fund
3. Postal money order – subject to restrictions
4. Bill of lading – no unconditional promise or order
5. Certificate of stock – no unconditional promise or order
6. Warehouse receipt – no unconditional promise or order
Negotiable Instruments Law

Non-Negotiable Instrument
 does not or not all

 transferred by assignment

 transferee acquires only rights of


transferor
 prior parties merely warrant legality of his
title
 no such right of recourse
Negotiable Instruments Law

Negotiable Documents of Title


 goods
 mere evidence of title
 does not
 intermediate parties are not secondarily liable if
dishonored
 merely steps into the shoes of the transferor
Negotiable Instruments Law

Steps in the execution of a negotiable


instrument

 Act of writing (making or drawing) the instrument


conformably with the requirements of Section1 of NIL;
and
 Delivery or issuance of the instrument with intent to be
bound thereunder to a person who takes it as a holder
Negotiable Instruments Law

Incidents in the Life of a Negotiable Instrument


 Issue – the first delivery of the instrument complete in
form to a person who takes it as a holder.
 Negotiation – transfer of an instrument from one
person to another as to constitute the transferee the
holder thereof.
 Presentment for Acceptance – this is required in

certain kinds of bills of exchange as in the case where


presentment for acceptance by the drawee is necessary
to fix the maturity of an instrument payable after sight.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Incidents in the Life of a Negotiable Instrument


 Acceptance – this is a signification by the drawee of his assent
to the order of the drawer. In this case, the drawee becomes an
acceptor who is primarily liable under the instrument.
 Dishonor by Non-Acceptance – this takes place when the
bill of exchange is presented for acceptance by the drawee and the
latter refuses to accept the same.
 Presentment for Payment – this takes place when the
holder exhibits the instrument to the drawee or the person liable
thereon and demands payment from him on or after the date of
maturity.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Incidents in the Life of a Negotiable Instrument


 Dishonor by Non-Payment – this takes place where the
instrument is presented for payment and payment is refused or
cannot be obtained, or where presentment for payment is excused
and the instrument is overdue and unpaid.
 Notice of Dishonor – this takes place when the instrument is
dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment in order to notify
the parties secondarily liable thereon of the identity of the
instrument, the fact of dishonor and the demand for payment. (In
the case of foreign bills of exchange, the notice must be in the form
of a protest which contains substantially the same matters as a
notice of dishonor but must be notarized.)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Incidents in the Life of a Negotiable Instrument

Discharge – it takes place when the instrument is paid at


or after maturity by a person who is principally liable
thereon, and also when notice of dishonor or protest is
not given within the time as specified by law. In the
latter case, all parties secondarily liable are discharged
and can no longer be held liable by the holder.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Section 1- Form of Negotiable


Instrument
(a) It must be in writing and signed by the maker
or drawer;
(b) Must contain an unconditional promise or
order to pay sum certain in money;
(c) Must be payable on demand or at a fixed or
determinable future time;
Negotiable Instruments Law

(d) Must be payable to order or bearer;

(e) Where the instrument is addressed to the


drawee, he must be named or otherwise
indicated therein with reasonable certainty
Negotiable Instruments Law

Promissory note – is an unconditional


promise in writing made by one person
to another, signed by the maker,
engaging to pay on demand, or at a
fixed or determinable future time, a sum
certain in money to order or bearer
Negotiable Instruments Law

Bill of exchange – is an unconditional


order in writing addressed by one
person to another, signed by the person
giving it, and requiring the person to
whom it is addressed to pay upon
demand or a fixed or determinable
future time a sum certain in money to
order or bearer.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Parties to a Promissory Note


1. Maker – one who signs the instrument
2. Payee – party to whom the promise is made

Parties to a Bill of Exchange


1. Drawer – who issues and draws the bill
2. Payee – party to whom the bill is payable
3. Drawee – party upon whom the bill is drawn
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 2 –Certainty as to sum what constitutes

(a) With interest

- whether fixed, compounded, increasing or


decreasing
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 2 –Certainty as to sum what constitutes

(b) With stated installments

- 2 important things

1. amount to be paid must be stated


2. date of maturity must also be stated
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 2 –Certainty as to sum what constitutes

(c) By stated installments with acceleration clause

if dependent on maker – Negotiable


if dependent of payee/holder – Non-negotiable
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 2 –Certainty as to sum what constitutes

(a) With interest

- whether fixed, compounded, increasing or


decreasing
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 2 –Certainty as to sum what constitutes

(d) With exchange – (not applicable to inland or domestic


bill)

(e) With costs of collection or attorney’s fee – due to the


fact that it take effect after maturity of the instrument
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 3 – When promise is unconditional

If source of payment – not negotiable


If source of reimbursement – negotiable

Past tense – negotiable


Future tense – non-negotiable
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 4 – Determinable future time; what


constitutes
(a) At a fixed period after date or sight; or
(b) On or before a fixed or determinable
future time specified therein; or
(c) On or at a fixed period after the
occurrence of a specified event which is
certain to happen
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 5 – Additional provisions not affecting


negotiability

General Rule – the instrument is non-


negotiable if it contains a promise or
order to do any act in addition to the
payment of money
Negotiable Instruments Law

Exceptions –
1. Sale of collateral securities
2. Confession of judgment
3. Waiver of benefit granted by law
4. Election of holder to require some other act

if option is on holder – negotiable


if option is on maker – non-negotiable
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 6 – Omissions
Even if the following are not stated, still negotiable
1. Not dated
2. Omission of value
3. Omission of place
4. Presence of seal
5. Designation of particular kind of current money payable
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 7 – When payable on demand


(a) Where it is expressed to be payable on
demand, or at sight, or on presentation
(b) In which no time for payment is
expressed.
(c) When issued, accepted or indorsed
when overdue
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 8 – When payable to order

-6 instances
Negotiable Instruments Law

Principle

Once bearer, always bearer


Negotiable Instruments Law

Principle –

Order instrument can


become a bearer instrument
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 9 – When payable to bearer


(a) When expressed to be payable;
(b) When payable to a person named therein or bearer;
(c) When it is payable to the order of a fictitious or non-
existing person, and such fact was known to the
person making it so payable;
(d) When the name of the payee does not purport to be
the name of any person; or
(e) When the only or last indorsement is an indorsement in
blank
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 10 – Terms , when sufficient

- Mere defect in language or


grammatical error will not invalidate the
instrument
- Substitution is allowed
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 11 – Date, presumption

- whenever there is a date written, it is


the true/correct date
- only a disputable presumption
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 12 – Ante-dated and post-dated

Gen. rule – ante-dating or post-dating is not


per se illegal
Exception – if done for an illegal purpose
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 13 – Date
Gen. rule – not allowed to insert or change
any date (Effect – material alteration)
Exception
1. To fix the maturity
2. To fix the interest
3. To determine whether there is
reasonable period of time
Negotiable Instruments Law

Complete v. Incomplete
Delivered v. Undelivered
HDC v. HnotDC
Personal v. Real defense
Prior v. Remote
Subsequent v. Immediate
Negotiable Instruments Law

Assignment v. Negotiation
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 14 – Incomplete but delivered


instrument – (only a personal defense)

- Doctrine of Comparative Negligence


- Breach of Trust or Authority
Negotiable Instruments Law

 Holder has prima facie authority to complete the


instrument;
 Completion to be done within a reasonable time
and according to the authority given;
 Holder in due course of the instrument
previously completed in breach of instructions
can enforce the same as if regularly completed.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 15 – Incomplete and Undelivered


Instrument

- a real defense
Negotiable Instruments Law

 Between immediate parties and a remote party not a


holder in due course, delivery to be effectual must be
made by or under the authority of the maker, drawer,
acceptor or indorser, as the case may be;
 If the instrument is in the hands of a holder in due
course, all prior deliveries are conclusively presumed
valid;
 If the instrument is out of the hands of the person who
signed it, a valid and intentional delivery is disputably
presumed.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 16 – Complete but


undelivered instrument

- a personal defense
Negotiable Instruments Law

Incomplete and Undelivered Instrument


(Section 15)

 If the completed and delivered without


authority, the instrument is not a valid contract
against any person who signed before delivery.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 17 – Rules of construction in case


of ambiguity or omission
(a) Gen rule – Words v. Figures = Words
Exception – Words
(b) Payment of interest
Rule – date of interest
Exception – date of instrument
Exception to exception – date of issuance
(c) Date required (but no date) – date of issuance
Negotiable Instruments Law

(d) Written provisions v. Printed provisions = written

(e) PN or BE = the holder may treat it either at his election

(f) Doubt on signature – deemed as an indorser

(g) I promise to pay – Solidary


We promise to pay - Joint
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 18 – Liability of person signing in


trade or assumed name
Gen rule – Only persons whose signature appears on the
instrument are liable thereon
Exception – LIABLE (even if signature does not appear)
1. person signs in a trade or assumed name
2. principal is liable if a duly authorized agent signs in
his own behalf
3. In case of forgery
Negotiable Instruments Law

4. Where the acceptor makes his acceptance


of a bill on a separate paper (Sec. 134)
5. Where a person makes a written promise to
accept a bill before it is drawn (Sec. 135)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Secs. 19/20 Signature by Agent


Requisites to apply
1. Duly authorized
2. Signs in a representative capacity
3. Discloses the principal

If one is absent – agent is personally liable


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 21 – Signature by procuration

e.g. pp, PP

- The agent has limited authority to sign the


instrument
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 22 – Infancy and Ultra


vires act of the corporation

- Both are real defenses


- Minor can negotiate but not liable
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 23 – FORGERY (real


defense)
 Forgery – is the counterfeit making or fraudulent
alteration of any writing.
 b. Effect – The signature is wholly inoperative, and no
right to retain the instrument, or to give a discharge
therefore, or to enforce payment thereof against any
party to it, is acquired through or under such signature.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 23 – FORGERY (real


defense)

a. Forgery in Order instrument


b. Forgery in bearer
c. Forgery in check/bill of exchange (liability of the
drawee)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 24 – Consideration

- Presumption of consideration
- Presumption to have been a party
thereto for value
Negotiable Instruments Law

 Absence of consideration – is the total lack of


consideration, no consideration or illegal consideration.
 Failure of consideration – is failure of the agreed
consideration to materialize.
 Both absence and failure of consideration are defenses
personal to the prejudiced party, and available against
any person not a holder in due course.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 25. Value – any consideration


sufficient to support a simple contract.

An antecedent or pre-existing debt


constitutes value
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 26 – Holder for value

- one who has given valuable


consideration for the instrument issued
or negotiated to him
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 28 – Effect of want or failure of


consideration

– BOTH are personal defenses


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 29 – Liability of the accommodation


party

Accommodated party – Primarily liable


Accommodation party – Surety

Regular party v. Accommodation party


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 30 – Negotiation

- is the transfer of a negotiable instrument from one


person to another as to constitute the transferee the
holder thereof

Methods of transfer of negotiable instrument


1. Issue
2. Negotiation
3. Assignment
Negotiable Instruments Law

How is instrument negotiated?

If order instrument – indorsement plus


delivery
If bearer – mere delivery
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 31 – How indorsement is made?

- On the back of the instrument itself

- On a separate piece of paper attached to


the instrument (Allonge)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 32 –
Gen Rule – Indorsement must be of the
entire instrument (if not, not negotiable)

Exception – if already partially paid


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 33 – Kinds of indorsement

Special v. Blank
Restrictive v. non-restrictive
Qualified v. unqualified
Conditional v. unconditional
Joint v. successive v. irregular v. facultative
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 34 – Special indorsement;


indorsement in blank
Special indorsement
e.g. Pay to B
Pay to B or order
Blank indorsement
e.g. (mere signature)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 35. Blank indorsement; how changed to


special indorsement

BI to Special Indorsement – allowed


BI to RI, QI, CI or any other – not
allowed (material alteration)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 36 – Restrictive indorsement

a. Pay to A only
b. Pay to A for collection
c. Pay to A, in trust for B
Negotiable Instruments Law

Effects of restrictive indorsement

a. Destroys the negotiability of the


instrument
b. All subsequent indorsees acquire only the
title of the first indorsee under the
restrictive indorsement
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 37 – Effects of restrictive

a. to receive payment
b. to bring any action thereon
c. transfer his rights as such indorsee
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 38 – Qualified Indorsement


e.g. – “without recourse”
Effects –
1. Does not affect the negotiability of the
instrument
2. Indorser’s liability is limited
3. Does not bar negotiation
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 39 – Conditional Indorsement

If condition is on the face – non-negotiable

If condition is at the back – holder may


collect but maker may choose to pay or
not
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 40 – Indorsement of instrument


payable to bearer
Effects –
- Once bearer, always bearer
- The person indorsing specially is liable as an
indorser to only such holders as make title
through his indorsement
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 41 – Indorsement where payable to 2


or more persons
e.g.
Pay to A and B (Joint)
G.R. - Both must indorse
Exception –
1. Partnership
2. Authorization
Pay to A or B (Solidary)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 42 – Effect of instrument drawn


or indorsed to a person as cashier

Sec. 43 – Indorsement where name is


misspelled
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 44 – Indorsement in
representative capacity

Sec. 45 – Time of indorsement

Sec. 46 – Place of indorsement


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 47 –
Gen rule – An instrument negotiable in origin is
always negotiable

Exceptions
1. if restrictively indorsed
2. discharged by payment or otherwise
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 48 – Striking out indorsements

Effect on bearer instrument –


Effect on order instrument –

Effect if stricken – no longer liable


Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 49 – Transfer without


indorsement

Effect – non-negotiable
Remedy – ask that it be indorsed
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 50 – Reacquirer

- A holder who negotiates an instrument


and then subsequently reacquires it
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 51 – Rights of the holder

a. to sue on the instrument


b. to receive payment
Negotiable Instruments Law

Sec. 52 – Holder in due course


a. Complete and regular upon its face
b. Became the holder of it before it was overdue
c. Took it in good faith and for value
d. At the time it was negotiated to him, he had no notice
of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title
of the person negotiating the instrument
Negotiable Instruments Law

Material Alteration of Instrument


(Section 124)

Material alteration – Any alteration which changes


the date, the sum payable, the time or place of
payment, number or relation of the parties, or
medium or currency of payment, or adds a
place of payment where none is specified, or
which alters the effect of the instrument in any
respect.
Negotiable Instruments Law

 Effect – It avoids the instrument except as against the


party who made, authorized or assented to the
alteration, and subsequent indorsers.

 Where the altered instrument, however, is in the hands


of a holder in due course, not a party to the alteration,
he may enforce payment thereof according to its
original tenor.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Holder in due course (Section 52)

 Rights – He may enforce the instrument and


sue thereon in his own name. He holds the
instrument free from any defect of title of prior
parties, free from defenses of prior parties
among themselves and he may enforce
payment of the instrument for full amount
against all parties liable thereon.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Holder not in due course – is one who became


a holder of the instrument without any, some or
all of the requisites under Sec. 52 of NIL.

 Rights – He can enforce the instrument and sue


under it in his own name. Prior parties,
however, even though remote, can avail against
him any defense among these prior parties and
prevent the said holder from collecting in whole
or in part the amount stated in said instrument.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Holder for value – is one who has all the


requisites for a holder in due course
except notice of want of consideration. He
is not necessarily a holder in due course;
hence, prior parties may avail of defenses
against said holder. (Prudencio v. CA, 143
SCRA 596)
Negotiable Instruments Law

Real / Absolute / Legal Defense – a defense which


attaches to the instrument irrespective of the parties
and is predicated on the principle that the right sought
to be enforced has never existed or has ceased to exist.

 Examples – forgery or unauthorized signature (Sec. 23);


material alteration (Sec. 124), incomplete and
undelivered instrument (Sec. 15)

 Against whom available – a real defense is available


against all holders, whether in due course or not.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Personal or Equitable Defense – a defense


growing out of an agreement or conduct of a
particular person in regard to an instrument
which renders it inequitable for him although
owner of it, to enforce it against the defendant.

 Examples – complete but undelivered


instrument (Sec. 16), incomplete but delivered
instrument (Sec. 14), absence or failure of
consideration, defect of title
Negotiable Instruments Law

Rights of Holder in General (Section 51)


a) He may sue on the instrument in his own
name; and
b) He may receive payment and if the payment
is in due course, the instrument is discharged.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Rights of Holder in Due Course


a) He may sue on the instrument in his own name
(Section 51);
b) He may receive payment and if payment is in due
course, the instrument is discharged;
c) He holds the instrument free from any defect of title
of prior parties;
d) He holds the instrument free from defenses available
to prior parties among themselves; and
e) He may enforce payment of the instrument for the
full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon.
Negotiable Instruments Law

Rights of Holder NOT in Due Course


 He may sue on the instrument in his own name (Sec 51);

 He may receive payment and if the payment is in due

course, the instrument is discharged;


 He is entitled to the instrument but holds it subject to

the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable (Section


58); and
 He has all the rights of the holder in due course from
whom he derives his title in respect of all parties prior to
such holder, provided he is not himself a party to any
fraud or illegality affecting the instrument (Section 58).

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi