that deals with moral principles. ETHICS • Moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity. • Moral concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character. ETHICS • A set of moral principles: a theory or system of moral values • The principles of conduct governing an individual or a group • The discipline dealing with what is good and what is bad and with moral duty and obligation MORAL • Of or relating to principles of right and wrong behavior • Conforming to a standard of right behavior NORM
• A principle of right action binding upon the
members of group and serving to guide, control, or regulate proper and acceptable behavior WHAT ARE ETHICAL PRINCIPLES? • Ethical principles are general standards of conduct that make up an ethical system. • Ethical principles are behavior guide which entails particular imperatives. • These imperatives involve specification that some type of action or conduct is either prohibited, required, or permitted in certain circumstances. FUNDAMENTAL ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
“nomos” (rule, governance, or law). • People should be free to choose and entitled to act on their preferences provided their decisions and actions do not stand to violate, or impinge on, the significant moral interest of others. • We have an obligation to respect the autonomy of other persons, which is to respect the decisions made by other people concerning their own lives. • This is also called the principle of human dignity. • It gives us a negative duty not to interfere with the decisions of competent adults, and a positive duty to empower others for whom we’re responsible.
Corollary principles: honesty in our dealings with others &
obligation to keep promises. NON-MALEFICENCE
• Comes from the Latin-derived maleficent
• from maleficus meaning wicked, prone to evil • From malum meaning evil • male meaning ill • As a moral principle, non-maleficence (literally refuse evil), prescribes above all, DO NO HARM, which entails a stringent obligation not to injure or harm others. BENEFICENCE
• From Latin word beneficus, from bene meaning well
or good and facere meaning to do. • This principle prescribes “ABOVE ALL, DO GOOD” • In practice in entails a positive obligation to literally act for the benefit of others and contribute to the welfare and well-being of others. • We have an obligation to bring about good in all our actions.
Corollary principle: We must take positive steps to prevent
harm. However, adopting this corollary principle frequently places us in direct conflict with respecting the autonomy of other persons. • Act of beneficence can include such virtuous actions as: care, compassion, empathy, sympathy, alrtuism, kindness, mercy, love, friendship and charity. • We have an obligation not to harm others: "First, do no harm."
Corollary principle: Where harm cannot be avoided, we are obligated to
minimize the harm we do.
Corollary principle: Don't increase the risk of harm to others.
Corollary principle: It is wrong to waste resources that could be used for
good.
Combining beneficence and nonmaleficence: Each action must produce more
good than harm. JUSTICE
• From the Latin word Justus meaning righteous.
DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE:
• Justice as revenge (retributive justice)
• Justice as mercy (Christian Ethics) • Justice as harmony • Justice as equity (impartiality and fairness) • Justice as avoiding parochialism and reducing global injustice • Justice as equality (equals must be treated equally) • We have an obligation to provide others with whatever they are owed or deserve. In public life, we have an obligation to treat all people equally, fairly, and impartially. Corollary principle: Impose no unfair burdens.
Combining beneficence and justice: We are obligated
to work for the benefit of those who are unfairly treated. • Justice as an equal distribution of benefits and burdens • Justice as what is deserved (each according to one’s merit or worth) ACTIVITY
• Cite some scenarios where you can apply the
four fundamental ethical principles. • Provide two (2) scenarios for each ethical principle. • Explain and justify your answers. CORE VALUES OF JOURNALISM
• Accuracy and fact-based communications;
• Humanity and respect for others; • Transparency and accountability. CORE VALUES FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS • Accuracy and fact-based communications. (Avoiding malicious deception and untruth – and understanding the exceptions, such as humour and satire); • Humanity and respect for the Other. (Challenging hate-speech, incitement and discrimination in all its forms, including misogyny); • Transparency and Accountability. (Challenging plagiarism and understanding the right to anonymity and respect for sources of information and the need to correct errors); • Introduction to free expression in the digital age. (The limits to free expression. Contemporary threats and the challenges facing policymakers, civil society, academics and media professionals); • The Difference between Journalism and Free Expression. (Understanding ethics in the context of self-regarding and others-regarding communications); • Personal and Public Communications. (The public sphere and the value of self-restraint. Developing a shared culture for tolerance and respect in communications); • Pluralism and Other Voices. (The importance of diversity of opinion to building democracy and informed society); ETHICAL USE OF INFORMATION PLAGIARISM:
• Using other people’s words and ideas without
clearly acknowledging the source of the information. COMMON KNOWLEDGE:
• Facts that can be found in numerous places and are
likely to be widely known. • Example: John F. Kennedy was elected President of the United States in 1960. This is generally known information. You do not need to document this fact INTERPRETATION:
• You must document facts that are not generally known,
or ideas that interpret facts. • Example: Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player ever to have played the game. • This idea is not a fact but an interpretation or an opinion. • You need to cite the source. QUOTATION:
• Using someone’s words directly.
• When you use a direct quote, place the passage between quotation marks, and document the source according to a standard documenting style. • Example: According to John Smith in The New York Times, “37% of all children under the age of 10 live below the poverty line”. • You need to cite the source. PARAPHRASE:
• Using someone’s ideas, but rephrasing them in
your own words. • Although you will use your own words to paraphrase, you must still acknowledge and cite the source of the information. PARAPHRASE:
• Using someone’s ideas, but rephrasing them in
your own words. • Although you will use your own words to paraphrase, you must still acknowledge and cite the source of the information. GROUP ACTIVITY:
• Create a presentation about Plagiarism, its legal
implications, and strategies in avoiding plagiarism. • Submit your work online. • Due on Thursday July 4, 2019. TYPES OF MEDIA: PRINT, BROADCAST, NEW MEDIA LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• State the learning objectives:
• Classify contents of different media types. • Define media convergence through current examples. • Discuss to class on how a particular individual is portrayed in public using different type of media. TYPE OF MEDIA
social network, radio, memeography, newsletter, cellphone, journals, film/movie PRINT BROADCAST NEW MEDIA MEDIA CONVERGENCE
• The co-existence of traditional and new media: print media, broadcast
media (radio and television), the Internet, mobile phones, as well as others, allowing media content to flow across various platforms. • The ability to transform different kinds of media into digital code, which is then accessible by a range of devices (ex. from the personal computer to the mobile phone) • Creating a digital communication environment. Media Convergence in Platform Example Communication Education Advertisement/Commercial News Entertainment HAWTHORNE EFFECT
• The alteration of behavior by the subject of a
study due to their awareness of being observed. BOOMERANG EFFECT
• It refers to the unintendedconsequences of an
attempt to persuade resulting in the adoption of an opposing position instead.