Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abletis
An overview Department of Sociology, PUP
Sociology
the study of society and social interactions taking place
within it
the study of social facts
the study of social structures
the study of social processes Our Social World Model
the queen of the social sciences
Research areas in Sociology [Fields of Specialization]
among social scientists and cultural workers, sociologists
are the more frequent and vivid in displaying the
sociological imagination
a debunking science
Global
Community
Society
National Organizations,
Institutions, and Ethnic
Subcultures
Local
Organizations and
Community
Me (and
My Inner
Circle)
Arts
Childhood
Research Areas in Sociology
ClinicalSociology
Communication, Knowledge and Culture
Community Research
Comparative Sociology
Disasters
Education
Family Research
Research Areas in Sociology
Futures Research
Health
History of Sociology
Housing and Built Environment
Labor Movements
Law
Leisure
Migration
Research Areas in Sociology
Organization
Population
Professional Groups
Rational Choice
Religion
Research Areas in Sociology
Science and Technology
Social Classes and Social Movements
Social Psychology
Social Indicators
Sociocybernetics
Sport
Stratification
Theory
Research Areas in Sociology
Tourism,
Internationl
Women in Society
Work
Youth
source: http://www.isa-sociology.org/rc.htm
CHED Memo 20, S. 2013
General Education - common to all programs.
+4 + 12 Filipino subjs.
+7 + 21 Socio subjs.
[< 23 old curr.]
+2 + 6 Local langs.
Type 3: “liberal practicality” and cultivating method for its own sake.
Grand Theory
“To be aware of the idea of social structure and to use it with sensibility
is to be capable of tracing such linkages among a great variety of
milieux. To be able to do that is to possess the sociological imagination.”
(P. 17)
“[T]hat every self-conscious thinker must at all times be aware of—and
hence be able to control—the levels of abstraction on which he
is working. The capacity to shuttle between levels of abstraction, with
ease and with clarity, is a signal mark of the imaginative and systematic
thinker.” (P. 43)
Methodological Inhibition
But no method, as such [natural scientific
method/statistics/positivism], should be used to delimit
the problems we take up, if for no other reason than
that the most interesting and difficult issues of method
usually begin where established techniques do not
apply. (P. 83)
If the problems upon which one is at work are readily
amenable to statistical procedures, one should always
try to use them... No one, however, need accept such
procedures, when generalized, as the only procedure
available. Certainly no one need accept this model as a
total canon. It is not the only empirical manner. (P. 85)
Use of Method and Theory
‘Method’ has to do, first of all, with how to ask and answer
questions with some assurance that the answers are more or
less durable. ‘Theory’ has to do, with paying close attention
to the words one is using, especially their degree of
generality and their logical relations. The primary purpose
of both is clarity of conception and economy of procedure,
and most importantly just now the release rather than the
restriction of the sociological imagination. (P. 135)
For the classic social scientist, neither method nor theory is an
autonomous domain; methods are methods for some range
of problems; theories are theories of some range of
phenomena... that he must be very well acquainted in a
substantive way with the state of knowledge in the area with
which the studies being examined are concerned. (Ibid)
Use of Method and Theory
Serious attention should be paid to general discussion of methodology only
when they are in direct reference to actual work... But neither Method nor
Theory alone can be taken as part of the actual work of the social studies. (P.
136)
Classic social science... Neither ‘builds up’ from microscopic study nor ‘deduces
down’ from conceptual elaboration. Its practitioners try to build and to deduce
at the same time, in the same process of study, and to do so by means of
adequate formulation and reformulation of problems and of their adequate
solutions. To practise such a policy... is to take up substantive problems on the
historical level of reality; to state these problems in terms appropriate to them;
and then no matter how high the flight of theory, no matter how painstaking
the crawl among detail, in the end of each completed act of study, to state the
solution in the macroscopic terms of the problem... The character of these
problems limits and suggests the methods and the conceptions that are used
and how they are used. Controversy over different views of ‘methodology’ and
‘theory’ is probably carried on in close and continuous relation with substantive
problems. (Pp. 142-143)
Mills on Academic Specialization
As he comes to have a genuine sense of significant problems and to be
passionately concerned with solving them, he is often forced to master
ideas and methods that happen to have arisen within one or another
of these several disciplines. To him no social science specialty will seem
in any intellectually significant sense a closed world. He also comes to
realize that he is in fact practising the social science, rather than any
one of the social sciences, and that this is so no matter what particular
area of social lie he is most interested in studying. (P. 157)
On Politics
In common with most other people, he does feel that he
stands outside the major history-making decisions of this
period; at the same time he knows that he is among those
who take many of the consequences of these decisions. That
is one major reason why to the extent that he is aware of
what he is doing, he becomes an explicitly political man. No
one is ‘outside society’; the question is where each stands
within it. (P. 204)
In a world of widely communicated nonsense, any statement
of fact is of political and moral significant. All social
scientists, by the fact of their existence, are involved in the
struggle between enlightenment and obscurantism. In such a
world as ours, to practise social science is, first of all, to
practise the politics of truth. (P. 198)
Note about the term “sociological”
I hope my colleagues will accept the term ‘sociological imagination’. Political scientists who have read
my manuscript suggest ‘the political imagination’; anthropologists, ‘the anthropological imagination’–
and so on. The term matters less than the idea, which I hope will become clear in the course of this
book. By use of it, I do not of course want to suggest merely the academic discipline of
‘sociology’. Much of what the phrase means to me is not at all expressed by sociologist. In
England, for example, sociology as an academic discipline is still somewhat marginal, yet in much
English journalism, fiction, and above all history, the sociological imagination is very well developed
indeed. The case is similar for France: both the confusion and the audacity of French reflection since the
Second World War rest upon its feeling for the sociological features of man’s fate in our time, yet
these trends are carried by men of letters rather than by professional sociologists. Nevertheless, I
use ‘sociological imagination’ because: (1) every cobbler thinks leather is the only thing, and for
better or worse, I am a sociologist; (2) I do believe that historically the quality of mind has been
more frequently and more vividly displayed by classic sociologists than by other social scientists;
(3) since I am going to examine critically a number of curious sociological schools, I need a counter
term on which to stand. (P. 26)
Sociology is a debunking science
Peter Berger (1963) argued that dimensions
of sociological consciousness have four
characteristics:
Debunking
Unrespectability
Relativizing
Cosmopolitan
“Sociology is more like a passion. The
sociological perspective is more like a demon
that possesses one, that drives one
compellingly, again and again, to the
questions that are its own. An introduction to
sociology is, therefore, an invitation to a very
special kind of passion.” (Ibid:24)
References
Ballantine, Jeanne H. and Keith A. Roberts. 2011. Our Social World: Introduction to
Sociology. 3rd ed. CA: Pine Forge Press.
Berger, Peter. 1963. Invitation to Sociology, NY: Double Day
Bryjak, G. J. and M. P. Soroka. 2001. Sociology: Changing Societies in a Diverse World. 4th
ed. MA: Allyn and Bacon
Durkheim, Emile. 1895. The Rules of Sociological Method [Excerpts]. Retrieved April 18,
2012
(http://durkheim.uchicago.edu/Summaries/rules.html).
International Sociological Association (n.d.). Research Committees. Retrieved April 18, 2012
(http://www.isa-sociology.org/rc.htm).
Lemert, Charles. 2012. Social Things. 5th ed. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Mills, C. W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination, NY: Penguin Books