Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Pure
About PBD
Helps to remain productive, that occurs after drinking soda or high fructose beverages
Promoted the drink at farmers’ market, local food shows and local retailers at Oregon
Distributed at 200 retail outlets (1000 cases per month) at $3.74 for an 8 ounce can
Acquired by PDB in July 2013
Positioning Options for Crescent Pure
Energy Drink
Sports Drink
Organic Drink
Option 1 – Position as Energy Drink
Pros Cons
•Customers viewed ‘energy’ as Crescent’s most •Fall in regular consumption of such drinks due to
descriptive characteristic (informal survey) negative media attention
•Price point $2.75, which was below industry •Competition – 85% collective market share in the
average of $2.99 category occupied by top 4 players
•Potential market size - $8.5 billion in 2013 and $9.5 •Only 32% of consumers over the age of 18 drank
billion in 2014 (market growth of 40% between energy drink in the past 6 months
2010 and 2012 and expected to be $13.5 billion by
2018) -> approx. 60% growth •11% of whom were drinking fewer energy drink
that they had a year earlier due to heath and safety
•Crescent’s organic certification and minimal reasons
caffeine content acted as a point of differentiation
when compared with competitors •Some younger consumers noted that Crescent had
less energy than they had hoped
Option 2 – Position as Sports Drink
Pros Cons
• Market of $6.3 billion in 2012 and is expected to be • Price of $2.75 for 8-oz was above industry average of
$9.58 by 2017 -> 52% growth $1 to $2 for 12-oz and 24-oz containers respectively
• 42% sports beverage drinkers considered sports drinks • Premium pricing strategy adopted by PBD earlier had
to be ‘anytime beverage’ and not just associate them backfired
with exercise
• Growth in market was only 9% between 2007 and
• Wider and regular consumer base as compared to 2012
Energy drinks
• Concerns regarding rising childhood obesity resulted in
• Consumer base – 62% between 18 and 24, 77% removing sports drinks from school vending machines
between 12 and 17
• Strong competition – 94% market share occupied by
the top 2 players
• Appealed mostly to younger consumers
• No demography of people of age group 12-17 in online
customer base of Crescent
Option 3 – Position as Organic Drink
Pros Cons
•Growing market opportunity for organic •Too much focus on health might cause to
drinks due to the consumers becoming lose other potential customer segment
more and more health conscious
•Would require higher advertising budget
•Scope for premium pricing due to the (than $750,000) to communicate with the
organic and energy ingredients large customer base
•Would attract larger consumer base •Limited production capacity for mass
market
•Evaluating more number of distributors and
retailers which would require more time
Recommendation
To position Crescent as an Energy Drink
In 1 year time (2014) –
Total Cost to Company will be $42,75,120
Total Revenue generated will be $42,85,440
Net Profit generated will be $10,320
Breakeven volume will be 3447678
Price Crescent between $2.79 to $2.99 as PBD by pricing the product at $2.75 is leaving money
on the table
Also, at $2.75 pricing, retailers were not getting their margins as per the industry standards
Thank You
Year 2014
Total Market size (in billion) $9.50
Advertising $7,50,000.00
Variable cost per can $1.02
Cans/case 24
Production capacity (cases) per month 12000
Total Cost of Production $35,25,120.00
Breakeven Cost to Company $42,75,120.00
Analysis
Selling Price for PDB to the distributors $1.24
Total Breakeven Volume 3447677
Break-even months 12
Total Sales (cans sold) 3456000
Total Revenue $42,85,440.00