Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Electronics Engineering
CRITERION 2
Program Curriculum and Teaching-Learning Processes
CRITERION 2 Mark Weightage
Mark Weightage
Program Curriculum 20
• The hours allocated and credits for each subject are presented in the table
given below according to the curriculum of Anna University, Chennai.
sample
Chart showing the Contribution of different streams in the
University Curriculum (2017 regulation)
CURRICULUM CONTENT
10.28 9.14
6.2
Mathematics
Basic Sciences
10.29
Basic Engineering
Computing
Interdisciplinary
2.86
Humanities
Professional core
6.86 Electives
49.14
5.14
Broad Curriculum:
• Co-Curricular Activities
• Extra Curricular Activities
Co-Curricular Activities vs PO Mapping
Activities PO Mapping
Guest Lectures PO1, PO2, PO3, PO5, PO6, PO10, PO11, PO12
Symposiums PO1, PO2, PO3, PO5, PO6, PO9, PO10, PO11, PO12
Workshops PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO6, PO9, PO10, PO11, PO12
Inplant Training PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO6, PO9, PO10, PO11, PO12
Industry Oriented Training PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO6, PO9, PO10, PO11, PO12
Extra Curricular Activities
Activities PO Mapping
Energy Club PO1, PO2, PO3, PO6, PO7, PO8, PO9, PO10, PO11, PO12
C412 2.80 2.25 2.60 2.60 3.00 2.67 3.00 - - - - 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total 140.3 124.52 101.48 85.4 82.1 36.69 38.8 16.37 48.2 31.8 31.4 54.85 42.4 53.52
Average 2.46 2.15 1.95 1.86 2.11 1.75 1.85 2.05 1.79 1.77 1.74 1.63 1.51 1.91
Analysis of Curriculum Map to Identify Gaps in the Curriculum
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
Percentage Column1 Column2
of
The analysis of the curriculum map
• The analysis of the curriculum map shows that the level of
achievement of the PO’s -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 is greater than 60%.
• Hence the achievement of the above stated PO’s is possible with the
current curriculum to some extent.
• The percentage of achievement of the PO’s – 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 is less
than 60%.
• This implies that in order to achieve the above PO’s the content to be
imparted beyond the syllabus should be identified.
Gaps in the Curriculum
MARKS(100)
Describe Processes followed to improve
quality of Teaching & Learning
• Processes may include adherence to academic calendar and
improving instruction methods using pedagogical initiatives such as
real world examples, quality of laboratory experience with regard to
conducting experiments, recording observations, analysis of data,
etc. Encouraging bright students, assisting weak students etc. The
implementation details and impact analysis need to be documented
Overview of Section 2.2.1
Processes to improve quality of teaching and learning
Initiatives
• Academic Calendar
• The Academic Calendar serves as an information source and planning document for students,
faculty, staff and the department. The academic calendar is prepared at the beginning of
each semester with a clear plan of conducting examinations, co curricular and extracurricular
activities of the college. Each department will prepare a department wise academic calendar
listing the plan of the activities of the department such as department staff meeting,
association activities, professional body activities, remedial classes and tests.
CAYm1 2017-2018 (July-November)
CAYm1 2017-2018 (December-June)
ADHERENCE TO ACADEMIC CALENDAR 2017-2018 (ODD SEM)
Pedagogical Initiatives
Interactive classrooms:
Each student should maintain a rough record to record the details of work done in each laboratory session.
The students are directed to write the step by step procedure to achieve a solution for the given experiment.
The faculty-in-charge will check the procedure and then student’s can proceed with doing the experiment.
Students should record the observations in the rough record while doing the experiment.
Students may also analyze the data to plot graph or other related work.
The final output will be verified by the faculty-in-charge.
Students should add the details of the experiments done in the laboratory to the prescribed record book.
Students can appear for the University practical Examination only if the record is certified by the faculty-in-
charge
Flow Chart:
Encouraging Bright Students:
The students scored above 80% marks belong to the group of bright students.
The measures taken to encourage bright students will be decided by the
respective faculty.
The measures taken may include the following and additional actions may be
added according to the requirement:
Recommend some quality references.
Provide details of books to be referred.
Suggest some e-resources and journals.
Introduce a new tool/software.
Assist weak students.
Prepare quiz on topics from the subject.
Self learning facilities
Assistance to weak students:
A total of three tests will be conducted in each semester to assess the student’s performance in theory subjects.
After each test, the faculty will analyze the results and categorize the students into two groups.
The students who scored less than 50% marks belong to group of weak students and above 80% belong to the group of bright students.
Remedial classes will be conducted for the weak students by each faculty.
The number of hours taken for remedial classes will be decided by the faculty as required.
A remedial test will be conducted for the weaker students thereafter and the results are analyzed to identify the impact of the remedial classes.
Additional measures will be taken by the respective faculty in cases where the students fail to achieve the objective of remedial classes.