Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dr Parvinder Jhita
Dr Jerry Greenough
Engineering Dynamics Inc.
Overview
• Introduction: Collapse Capabilities
• Element Technology + Limit States
• Joint strength, joint flexibility
• Benchmarks
• Demonstrations
Ship impact analysis
Dropped object study
Non-linear blast analysis
• Trouble-shooting
EDI / SACS
Brief History
John Fowler
Dr David Garland
James Angehr
SACS Collapse
Brief History
Sub-area (rod)
Member sub-areas
Various cross sections
Plastic Layer
Plate Performance
• Improved elastic performance
• Based on Discrete Kirchhoff Theory (DKT)
• Improved out-of-plane deflection profile
• Results available at element corners using ‘DK’
• Triangles recommended for very large out-of-
plane deflections
• Previous plate theory available using ‘ND’
• Benchmarks (inc, patch test) – SAMPLE16
Local Buckling
Three methods
• API LRFD - LR
• Marshall, Gates et al. - MG
• API Bulletin 2U – 2U
Stress checked in each sub-area.
A moment-free hinge is inserted at the
exact location of the local buckling point.
Axial capacity is retained.
• Particularly Important
for old structures where joint
cans were not used.
MSL Formulation - MF
Fessler’s Approach - JF
Joint flexibility specified using CLPOPT (34:35)
Joint Flexibility - Fessler
• Linear behavior ( no
material/geometric non-
linear behavior).
• Uncoupled – each brace is
independent of forces in
other braces or chord.
• Method developed in 1986
gives reasonable answers
for elastic joint flexibility.
Joint Flexibility - MSL
• Method accounts for
interaction with chord load.
• Based upon joint
classification (K,Y, X joints).
• Accounts for interaction
coupling between internal
loads and moments.
• Apply ductility limits to
predict tensile joint failure.
Joint Strength / Failure
• Norsok - ND
• MSL – based on the joint flex. Approach - MS
• API LRFD - Punching shear criterion - JS
- 4 legs
- 157ft (48m) water depth
- 30ft (9m) distance between legs at WP
- 4 conductors
- 355ft (108m) piles
EQE Benchmark
Loading from 270o from True North
EQE Benchmark
Results for loading from 270o from True North
EQE Benchmark
• Independent Assessment Conclusion:
“ The results indicate Collapse provides a good
estimate of platform ultimate capacity
compared to other nonlinear codes. This
Benchmark has been a standard of
comparison for pushover analysis and
Collapse has been shown to match the
standard.”
Bomel Benchmark
Overview
Test frame
6m x 12m x 12m
6.5m
(12.6m)
t = 1 cm
box stiffened
3.4m
5.0
0.015 0.029 0.2 time (secs)
Blast Analysis Procedure (i)
1. Loading a) self weight (dead load)
b) blast wave over-pressure
c) live loads
2. Generate mode shapes + mass matrix info.
3. Create load profile in the DYR input file
4. Run DYR and Collapse
front_wall\sacinp.blast
front_wall\dyrinp.blast
front_wall\clpinp.blast
Blast Analysis Procedure (ii)
SACINP
Dynpac
Dynamic Response
CLPINA DYROCI
(full) (= SACINP + new loads)
Collapse
Collapse Blast Loading
LDAP line
ship_impact\sacinp.ship_impact
ship_impact\seainp.ship_impact
ship_impact\clpinp.ship_impact
Ship Impact Procedure
IMPACT, ENERGY and SHPIND lines
di(m) F(MN)
1 0.0 2.5
2 1.0 8.0
3 2.0 19.0
4 3.0 27.0
5 4.0 30.0
SHPIND
Dropped Object Study
1 MT mass dropped from 4.5 metres
1T
Dropped Object Study
Impact Procedure
dropped_object\sacinp.dropped_object
dropped_impact\clpinp.dropped_object
Mesh Quality
Free Triangular (Delaunay) Mesh
Mesh Quality
Collapse Trouble-shooting
• Check convergence
Increase maximum iterations / member
iterations.
• Use finer increments
• Check for limit points + other events. Use Collapse
View with a high deflection factor.
• Run with fixed pile-heads (check soil data)
• Examine wishbone lengths
• If possible, elevate wishbones away from pile-head
joints
SACS Manual, Section 4.0 ‘Trouble Shooting’
Collapse Trouble-shooting
Wishbones
Leg
Wishbone
Unstable
Pile Configuration