Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Presented By-
- AppliChem was established in 1952 before World War-II in Chicago. A chemical to be added in low concentration to
- It’s manufacturer of Specialty Chemicals. the plastic molding compound during its
- Produced adhesive solution namely Release Ease. manufacture for easier separation of molded
parts.
• Sold as dry powder
The Company has 6 production units across for Release Ease. • Widely used in molding plastic parts
• Has been a steady profit generator for
company since 1982
1 Western Europe (Frankfurt)
• Competition was more fierce than in U.S. Hence, quality and product specifications were closely
monitored
• European customers made sure to consume Release Ease with one year of purchase
• European customers purchased Release Ease in 50 kilo bags
Case Questions
Recommendations
?
Why some plants are performing better ?
Manufacturing $ $ $ $ $ $
Cost 102.93 97.35 95.01 76.69 116.34 153.80
Mexican operators had
certain technical dept
because of which they were Larger number of employees
Bulkshipped Release Ease old equipments and the
able to maintain the were required in this plant
Miscellaneous to other company plants for only dryer was in poor
process improvements after due to different rules and
packaging repair
getting recommendations regulations of the Japan
from Frankfurt plant expert
Ari
Key – Takeaways from the Comparison
Manufacturing costs for Japan Plant is the Highest which may be because of extensive usage of technology
and automation, labs for testing and also employment of more workforce due to different rules and
regulations in Japan.
Capacity utilization for Venezuela plant is the highest (91%) because the plant has a small capacity and it
producing maximum quantity of Release-ease.
For the Gary plant the utilization is good (75%) also they are offering several varieties of the product and have
different packaging sizes their cost have gone up due to presence of older technology. Their main advantage
of this plant is the staff which is loyal.
Why some plants were better than others ?
-Number of people employed in R&D were
R&D
different in different plants
Objective Function : Minimization of total cost = Manufacturing cost + Shipping + Import costs
Constraints :
1. Demand Constraint => Unmet Demand = 0
2. Supply Constraint => Excess Capacity >= 0
3. Non-negativity constraint
Assumptions:
Total Demand for Gary’s Plant is considered as 26.4, it is assumed that all imports from North American
is coming to this region. (4.5% import tax & Larger plant with diversified packaging sizes).
The material is being exported from Mexico Plant to North America region.
Recommendations
Production Should decrease for Mexico
Plant as from the case it is given there will (In 1982)
be higher market fluctuations.
Supply Region Actual Production Proposed Production
Production increase in Gary plant in Mexico 17.2 6.2
order to cater whole US market demand Canada 2.6 3.7
thus reducing import costs.
Venezuela 4.1 4.5
Leverage Sunchem plant in Japan for Frankfurt 38 47
R&D purposes. The demand can be Gary 14 18.5
catered by Frankfurt Plant. Sunchem 4 0
(in million pounds)
Increased Production in Frankfurt Plant
since low manufacturing cost and
presence of state of art technology.
02 03 04 05