Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INSTRUCTOR : Y.WARELLA
DRS: International Relations 1964 –UGM-; YOGYAKARTA;
MPA: Public Administrations 1975 UNIV of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES, USA;
PhD : Doctor of Philosophy – 1983 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, USC,
LOS ANGELES, California, USA.
PROFESSOR – UNDIP- 1995
Positions at UNDIP
Secretary of the Faculty : 1973-1975
Associate Dean for Academic Affairs 1983-1989
Dean : 1989-1995
Secretary of Senate Diponegoro University 1997-2000
Chairman of MAP Program 2000-2010
Associate Rector for Academic Affairs 2001-2004
Director Graduate School UNDIP 2006-2010.
Lies about the reason for missing the deadline for a class assignment or a quiz
Takes a quiz and then tells another student (who hasn’t taken the quiz yet) information about the quiz (note
that in this example that both students have violated the Honor Code)
Copies (by any means and for any reason) any of the questions (or answers) on any of the quizzes or on the
Comprehensive Final Exam
Attempts to circumvent D2L’s (or any other information service’s) security systems to gain unauthorized
access to resources
Represents the work of another as one’s own work
Fails to make appropriate contributions to the Team Project
Fails to report violations of the Honor Code
This honor code has been influenced (including some word choice) by the Stanford University Honor Code (see: “Honor Code: Stanford University Office of Judicial Affairs,
Office of the Dean of Students” at http://www.stanford.edu/dept/vpsa/judicialaffairs/guiding/honorcode.htm).
The policies, procedures, guidelines, and practices of Minnesota State University Mankato govern situations of disruptive classroom behavior and academic dishonesty (see:
“Disruptive Classroom Behavior and Academic Dishonesty: Academic Referrals” at http://www.mnsu.edu/conduct/referral.html).
DASAR-DASAR KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
(FUNDAMENTAL OF PUBLIC POLICY)
INTRODUCTION – PENGERTIAN DASAR
Government
Society
INTRODUCTION – PENGERTIAN DASAR
Keputusan,
Kebijakan,
Kebijaksanaan (wisdom)
DEMOCRACY AND PUBLIC POLICY
The study of public policy is firmly grounded in the study of politics, which is as
ancient as human civilization itself.
Most of the ancient philosophers looked at politics in general, theoretical ways.
Plato’s Republic – The search for justice. One of Plato’s objectives in the
Republic was to show that justice is worthwhile—that just action is a good in
itself, and that one ought to engage in just activity even when it doesn’t seem to
confer immediate advantage.
Aristotle’s Politics - Since we see that every city-state is a sort of community and
that every community is established for the sake of some good (for everyone
does everything for the sake of what they believe to be good), it is clear that
every community aims at some good, and the community which has the most
authority of all and includes all the others aims highest, that is, at the good with
the most authority. This is what is called the city-state or political community.
[I.1.1252a1-7]
The systematic study of public policy is a 20th century
phenomenon.
Dates to 1922, when political scientist Charles Merriam sought
to connect the theory and practice of politics to understanding
the actual activities of government, that is, public policy.
Nevertheless, most of the literature on public policy dates back
only about 50 years.
The study of politics is the attempt to explain the
various ways in which power is exercised in the everyday
world and how that power is used to allocate resources
and benefits to some people and groups, and costs and
burdens to other people and groups.
The study of public policy is the examination of the creation, by
the government, of the rules, laws, goals, and standards that
determine what government does or does not do to create
resources, benefits, costs, and burdens.
In studying public policy, we focus on those decisions made (or
implicitly accepted) by government and nongovernmental
actors to address a problem that a significant number of people
and groups consider to be important and in need of a solution.
A major element of studying and teaching
public policy is the reliance of policy studies
on a broad range of the social sciences.
Table 1.1. Selected Disciplines That Study Public Policy
Political Science The study of political The political process is the American Political Science
relationships; that is, the study process through which policies Review, American Journal of
of the processes by which are made and enforced. Political Science, Journal of
societies seek to allocate Politics, Policy, Political
political power and the benefits Research Quarterly, Public
of such power, Opinion Quarterly
Sociology Sociology is the study of social Community and group activities American Sociological Review,
life, social change, and the are an important part of policy Contemporary Sociology, Journal
social causes and consequences making, because groups of of Sociology
of human behavior. Sociologists people often form to make
investigate the structure of demands.
groups, organizations, and
societies, and how people
interact within these contexts.
Economics The study of the allocation of There are many economic American Economic Review,
resources in a community, factors that influence public Econometrica, Journal of
however defined. Economists policy, such as economic Applied Economics, Journal of
study markets and exchanges. growth, productivity, Political Economy.
Welfare economists seek to employment, and the like. The
understand the extent to which tools of economics are often
an overall community’s welfare used to promote policies or to
can be maximized. explain why policies succeed or
fail.
Table 1.1. Selected Disciplines That Study Public Policy
Public Administration The study of the management of The management of public Public Administration Review,
government and nonprofit programs is an integral part of the Journal of Public Administration
organizations, including the policy process. PA scholars study Research and Theory
management of information, the motivation of program
money, and personnel to achieve implementers and targets and
goals developed through the help research innovations to
democratic process. improve service delivery.
Public Policy The study of what governments We give this label to the highly Journal of Policy Analysis and
choose to do or not to do, interdisciplinary study of the Management, Journal of Public
including studies of the policy public policy process. Policy Policy, Policy Studies Review,
process, policy implementation scholars develop theories about Policy Studies Journal, Journal of
and impact, and evaluation. how the policy process works and Policy History
develop tools and methods to
analyze how policy is made and
implemented.
WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY?
1. J.E.Anderson , 1975 :
Public policy is a purposive course of action followed by govern-ment in dealing with
some topic or mater of public concern
2. D.Easton , 1953 :
Public policy is the authoritative allocation of values for the whole society
3. T.R.Dye , 1978 :
Public policy is whatever govrnments choose to do or not to do
4. C.L.Chochran & E.F.Malone , 1995 :
Public policy consists of political decisions for implementing pro-grams to achieve
societal goals
22
WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY ?
23
OTHER DISTINCTIONS REGARDING POLICY
Problem Definition
Forecasting needs,
defining targets
Policy Design
Agenda
Defining nature
Setting size, distributions Decision
of problem analysis
Political
Opinion polls,
feasibility analysis
surveys,
Termination
etc. Policy
Summative
Formative Legitimation
evaluation
evaluation
Impact Implementation
Source : W.Persons, 1997, public policy
WHY DO WE STUDY PUBLIC POLICY?
Kontinentalis
Kebijakan Publik adalah turunan dari hukum, mempersamakan
kebijakan publik dan hukum, utamanya hukum publik maupun
hukum tata negara, dilihat sebagai proses interaksi diantara
institusi-institusi negara
Anglo-Saxonis
Kebijakan Publik adalah turunan dari politik-demokrasi, dilihat
sebagai produk interaksi antara negara dan publik
CHARACTERISTIC OF PUBLIC POLICY
Consciously and explicitly value oriented; in many cases the central theme
deals with the democratic ethos and human dignity
BENTUK KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
Pasal 7 UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, jenis dan
hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan terdapat tujuh tingkatan , yaitu:
a) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
b) Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat
c) Undang-Undang/Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang
d) Peraturan Pemerintah
e) Peraturan Presiden
f) Peraturan Daerah Provinsi
g) Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten/Kota
PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN DI LUAR
PASAL 7 UU NO. 12 TAHUN 2011
Peraturan-peraturan yang ditetapkan oleh:
MPR, DPR, MA, MK, BPK, Komisi Yudisial, Bank Indonesia, Menteri,
Badan, Lembaga atau Komisi yang setingkat yang dibentuk oleh perintah
UU, DPR, Daerah Provinsi, Gubernur, DPRD Kabupate/Kota,
Bupati/Walikota, Kepala Desa atau yang setingkat
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan sebagaimana di atas diakui
keberadaannya dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang
diperintahkan oleh Peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi atau
dibentuk berdasarkan kewenangan.
BENTUK KEDUA KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
Faktor Politik/Ideologi
Perlu dipertimbangkan, karena dalam perumusan kebijakan diperlukan
dukungan dari berbagai aktor kebijakan (policy actors), baik dari
kalangan pemerintah maupun bukan pemerintah
Faktor Ekonomi/Finansial
Perlu dipertimbangkan terutama apabila kebijakan tersebut akan
menggunakan dana yang cukup besar atau akan berpengaruh pada
situasi ekonomi dalam negara
Indikator yang perlu diperhatikan antara lain : tingkat inflasi dan
hutang LN, daya beli dan pendapatan perka-pita penduduk, potensi
daerah dan komoditas unggulan, dsb
FAKTOR STRATEGIS YANG BERPENGARUH DALAM
PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN
Faktor Administratif/Organisatoris
Perlu dipertimbangkan apakah dalam pelaksanaan kebijakan itu benar-
benar akan didukung oleh kemampuan administratif yang memadai,
atau apakah sudah ada organisasi yang akan melaksanakan kebijakan
itu
FAKTOR STRATEGIS YANG BERPENGARUH DALAM
PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN
Faktor Teknologi
Perlu mempertimbangkan apakah teknologi yang ada dapat mendukung,
apabila kebijakan tersebut akan diimplementasikan
Faktor Sosial, Budaya, Agama dan Hukum
Perlu dipertimbangkan apakah kebijakan tersebut tidak
menimbulkan benturan sosial, budaya dan agama atau yang sering
disebut masalah SARA
Faktor Pertahanan dan Keamanan
Perlu dipertimbangkan apakah kebijakan yang akan dikeluarkan ini
tidak akan mengganggu stabilitas keamanan negara.
FAKTOR DI ATAS AKAN MENJADI
KRITERIA DALAM MENENTUKAN
FEASIBILITAS (KELAYAKAN) DARI
ALTERNATIF KEBIJAKAN
YANG AKAN DIPILIH
TINGKATAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
LINGKUP NASIONAL
KEBIJAKAN NASIONAL
• Kebijakan negara yang bersifat fundamental dan stra-
tegis dalam pencapaian tujuan nasional.
• Wewenang MPR dan Presiden bersama-sama dengan
DPR
• Bentuk : UUD, TAP MPR, UU, PERPU
KEBIJAKAN UMUM
• Kebijakan Presiden sebagai pelaksana UUD, TAP MPR,
UU, guna mencapai tujuan nasional
• Wewenang Presiden
• Bentuk : PP, KEPPRES, INPRES
KEBIJAKAN PELAKSANAAN
• Penjabaran dari kebijakan umum sebagai strategi
pelaksanaan tugas di bidang tertentu
• Wewenang : menteri / pejabat setingkat menteri dan
pimpinan LPND
• Bentuk : Peraturan, Keputusan, Instruksi Pejabat
tertentu
LINGKUP WILAYAH / DAERAH
KEBIJAKAN UMUM
• Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah sebagai pelaksanaan
asas Desentralisasi dalam rangka mengatur urusan
Rumah Tangga Daerah
• Wewenang Kepala Daerah bersama DPRD
• Bentuk : PERDA
KEBIJAKAN PELAKSANAAN
• Wewenang : Kepala Daerah atau Kepala Wilayah
• Bentuk : Keputusan Kepala Daerah dan Instruksi
Kepala Daerah atau Keputusan Kepala Wilayah
dan Instruksi kepala Wilayah
PROSES KEBIJAKAN SECARA UMUM
Evaluasi
Kebijakan
Monitoring
Kebijakan
Revisi
Isu Kebijakan Kebijakan
(baru) Penghentian
Kebijakan x
Lingkungan Kebijakan
Implication of concepts of public policy:
Policy demands are those demands or claims made upon public officials by
other actors, private or official, in the political system for action or inaction on
some percieved problem.
System Environment
Personality Information
Systems Feedback
A
U
Social The Conversion T
Systems Flew I Demands of Demands
of H
N O
Effects from P R Outputs
U I T
International
Political nts T Support I
e e E
Systems Th ironm
Env S
Info Outputs
International
Ecological Information
Systems The Extra Feedback
Societal
International Environment
Social
Systems
PROSES / KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
SIKLUS Faktor-Faktor Strategis :
Politik, Ekonomi / Finansial
Admin / Organisatoris, Teknologi, Sosbud,
PERUMUSAN
KEBIJAKAN :
Agama, Hankam
S/D Dipilihnya alternatif
EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI
KEBIJAKAN KEBIJAKAN : • Keb. Langsung
• Keb. Tidak Langsung
• Keb. Campuran
MONITORING
KEBIJAKAN : • “Policy Output”
• “Policy Impact”
Low
• Family and Community
• Voluntary Organization
• Private Markets
Voluntary
Instruments
• Information and Exhortation
• Subsidies
• Auction of Property Rights
Mixed
• Regulation
• Public Enterprises
• Direct Provision
A Spectrum Of Policy Instruments
ruments
CompulsoryInst
High
INSTRUMENTS OF POLICY
Regulation
Government management
Taxing and spending
Market mechanisms
Education and information
56
9. THE POLICY PROCESS :
The Framework for Analisys
1. Kebijakan publik yang bersifat makro atau umum, atau mendasar yaitu Pasal 7 UU
No. 12 Tahun 2011
2. Kebijakan publik yang bersifat messo atau menengah, atau penjelas pelaksanaan.
Kebijakan ini dapat berbentuk Peraturan Menteri, Surat Edaran Menteri, Peraturan
Gubernur, Peraturan Bupati dan Peraturan Walikota. Dapat pula berbentuk Surat
Keputusan Bersama atau SKB antar-menteri, gubernur, dan bupati atau walikota
3. Kebijakan publik yang bersifat mikro adalah kebijakan yang mengatur pelaksanaan
atau implementasi kebijakan diatasnya. Bentuknya adalah peraturan yang
dikelurakan oleh aparat publik dibawah menteri, gubernur, bupati, dan walikota
DISTRIBUTIVE, REDISTRIBUTIVE AND
REGULATORY POLICIES
Distributive Policy
Kebijaksanaan yang mengatur tentang pemindahan alokasi kekayaan, pemilikan atau hak-hak
Contoh : pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum
Regulatory Policy
1. Anderson, James E. (Ed), Cases in Public Policy-Making, CBS Colege Publishing, New York:1982
2. Considine, Mark, Public Policy: A Critical Approach, Macmillian Education, Melbourne: 1994
3. Dewey, John, The Public and Its Problems, Swallow Press, New York: 1991
4. Howlett, Michael and M. Ramesh, Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystem, Oxford
Publishing, New York: 1992
5. Hill, Michael, The Policy Process: A Reader, Prentice Hall, Essex: 1997
6. Hill, Michael, The Policy Process in the Modern State, Pearson Education, New York, 1997
7. Hill, Michael and Peter Hupe, Implementing Public Policy, Sage Publication, London: 2002
8. Kelman, Steven, Making Public Policy: A Hopeful View of American Government, BasicBooks, New York: 1987
9. Kismartini dkk, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Penerbit universitas Terbuka, Jakarta: 2005
10. Moran, Michael and Martin Rein and Robert Goodwin (Ed), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford
University Press, New York: 2006
11. Nugroho, Riant D., Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi Implementasi dan Evaluasi, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta:
2003
12. Parsons, Wayne, Public Policy: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan, Prananda Media, Jakarta: 2005.
13. Palumbo, Dennis J. and Marvin A. Harder, Implementing Public Policy, Lexington Books, Toronto: 1981
14. Quade, E.S., Analysis for Public Decision, Elsevier Science Publishing, New York: 1982
15. Weimer, David L. and Aidan R. Vining, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, Prentice Hall, London: 1999
16. Wibawa, Samodra, Kebijakan Publik: Proses dan Analisis, Intermedia, Jakarta: 1994
Terima kasih