Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Corrections
(CA 2)
EAD
OLFU, 2nd Sem AY 2013-2014
Topics/Chapters
I. Introduction to NIC or CBTP
II. Probation
III. Parole
IV.Forms of Executive Clemency
V. Good Conduct Time Allowance
VI.The Future of Corrections and
Restorative Justice
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION AND
CONCEPT OF NON-
INSTITUTIONAL
CORRECTIONS
Introduction
• The main purpose of imprisonment is
to reform and rehabilitate those who
have committed a crime and convicted
by a competent court; and who are
considered a danger to the society, to
assist them to lead a law-abiding and
self-supporting life upon release.
Introduction
• In reality, however, the majority of
offenders are non-violent, petty
offenders serving short prison terms.
• Prison Overcrowding has become one
of the many problems of any
correctional enterprise in the world,
along with budgetary constraints and
ineffective prison guards.
Introduction
• In an attempt to reduce the over reliance on the
use of incarceration/imprisonment; the problems
of congestions/overcrowding; and to restore the
relationship between the offender, the victim and
the community by taking into consideration the
rehabilitative needs of the offenders, the
protection of the society and the interests of the
victims, the NON-INSTITUTION-BASED
CORRECTIONS or COMMUNITY-BASED
CORRECTIONS have been legally accepted by most
countries in the world, so with the Philippines.
The Community-Based Correctional Treatment
Programs (Non-Institutional Corrections)
1. Humanitarian Aspect
2. Restorative Aspect
3. Managerial Aspect
Humanitarian Aspect
• Imprisonment is not always
advisable. Placing a person to
custodial coercion is to place him
in physical jeopardy, thus
drastically narrowing his access to
sources of personal satisfaction
and reducing his self-esteem.
Restorative Aspect
• There are measures expected to be
achieved by the offender, such as an
establishment of a position in the
community in which he does not violate
the laws. These measures may be
directed at changing and controlling the
offender. The failure of the offender to
achieve these can result to recidivism.
Managerial Aspect
• Managerial skills are special
importance because of the sharp
contrast between the per capital cost
of custody and any kind of community
program. It is easier to manage those
undergoing community based
treatment programs than that of
custodial control.
Forms of Community-Based Correctional TPs
1.Probation
2.Parole
3.Forms of Executive Clemency
A. Pardon (Absolute and Conditional)
B. Commutation of Sentence
C. Reprieve
D. Amnesty
4. Good Conduct Time Allowance (GCTA)
Agencies responsible in the supervision and
administration of Community-Based TPs
1. DOJ as the lead agency / implementer
2. The Parole and Probation Administration
(PPA) created under PD 968
3. The Board of Pardons and Parole (BPP)
created under Act No 4103 and further
strengthened by EO No 292.
4. The Council for the Welfare of Children (CWC)
created under PD 603
5. The Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council
(JJWC) created under RA 9344
Legal Bases of Community-Based
Correctional TPs
1. PD 968 (Probation Law)
2. Act No 4103 (Indeterminate Sentence Law or
Parole Law) as amended by Act No 4225 and
further amended by RA 4203
3. Sec 19, Art VII, 1987 Philippine Constitution
(Executive Clemencies)
4. Article 97, RPC (Good Conduct Time Allowance)
and Act No 2489 (Industrial Good Time Law)
5. PD 603 (Child and Youth Welfare Code)
6. RA 9344 (Juvenile Justice Act) End of
Chapter I
Chapter II
PROBATION
Sub-Topics for Probation
1.Historical Background of Probation
2.The Adult Probation Law (PD 968)
3.The Probation and Parole Administration
(PPA) of the Philippines
4.Other Forms of Probation in the Philippines
a. PD 603 or the Child & Youth Welfare Code
b. RA 9165 or The Comprehensive Dangerous
Drugs Act of 2002
c. Article 12 of the Revised Penal Code
d. RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice Act of 2006
What is Probation?
• PROBATION is a term coined by John
Augustus, From the Latin verb "probare"
which means to prove or to test.
• Probation is a disposition whereby a
defendant, after conviction of an offense, the
penalty of which does not exceed 6 years of
imprisonment, is released subject to the
conditions imposed by the releasing court and
under the supervision of a probation officer.
General Concept of Probation
• Probation is a substitute for
imprisonment, the probationer is
compared to an out-patient, a sick
person who does not need to be
hospitalized because his illness is
considered less serious.
The Probation Law and PPA
• Presidential Decree 968 otherwise
known as the “Philippine Probation
Law” approved and took effect on July
24, 1976. Section 18, PD 968 as
amended states the creation of
Probation Administration under the
DOJ, which shall exercises general
supervision over all probationers.
The Advantages of Probation
1. The convicted criminal
offender can continue to work
in his place of employment.
2. It prevents the tendency of
broken homes.
3. It relieves prison congestion.
History of Probation
• The origins of probation can be traced to
English criminal law of the Middle Ages. Harsh
punishments were imposed on adults and
children alike for offenses that were not
always if a serious nature. Sentences such as
branding, flogging, mutilation and execution
were common. During the time of King Henry
VIII, for instance, no less than 200 crimes
were punishable by death, many of which
were minor offenses.
History of Probation
• The birth of Probation was said to be at
England in the year 1841.
• Two names are most closely associated
with the founding of probation: (1)
Matthew Davenport Hill, an 18th
century English barrister and judge, and
(2) John Augustus, a 19th Century
Boston shoemaker/boot-maker.
Matthew Davenport Hill (6 August 1792 – 7 June
1872) was an English lawyer and penologist.
Matthew Davenport Hill
• As a young professional in England, Hill had witnessed
the sentencing of youthful offenders to one-day terms on
the condition that they be returned to a parent or
guardian who would closely supervise them. When he
eventually became the Recorder of Birmingham, a
judicial post, he used a similar practice for individuals
who did not seem hopelessly corrupt. If offenders
demonstrated a promise for rehabilitation, they were
placed in the hands of generous guardians who willingly
took charge of them. Hill had police officers pay periodic
visits to these guardians in an effort to tack the
offender's progress and to keep a running account.
Matthew Davenport Hill
• He practiced methods which includes
suspending judgment and releasing the
convicts in his own recognizance with a
pledge not to commit any crimes.
• He was held as the “Father of Probation in
England” for working as guardians of
parents and employers of juvenile and first-
time offenders to save them from the
stigma of prison life.
John Augustus
John Augustus
• John Augustus, the "Father of Probation“, is
recognized as the first true probation officer. Augustus
was born in Woburn, Massachusetts, in 1785. By 1829,
he was a permanent resident of Boston and the owner
of a successful boot-making business. It was
undoubtedly his membership in the Washington Total
Abstinence Society that led him to the Boston courts.
Washingtonians abstained from alcohol themselves
and were convinced that abusers of alcohol could be
rehabilitated through understanding, kindness and
sustained moral suasion, rather then through
conviction and jail sentences.
John Augustus
• In 1841, He attended police court to bail out a "common
drunkard," hence, he was the first probationer. The
offender was ordered to appear in court three weeks
later after sentencing.
• He began an 18-year career as a volunteer probation
officer. Not all of the offenders helped by Augustus were
alcohol abusers, nor were all prospective probationers
taken under his wing. Close attention was paid to
evaluating whether or not a candidate would likely
prove to be a successful subject of probation. The
offender's character, age and the people, places and
things influence him/her were all considered.
John Augustus
• He was subsequently credited with
founding Investigations, one of three
main concepts of modern probation,
the other two being Intake and
Supervision. Augustus, who kept
detailed notes on his activities, was
also the first to apply the term
"probation" to this process of treating
offenders.
John Augustus
• By 1858, He had provided bail for 1,946 men and
women, young and old. Reportedly, only ten of
this number forfeited their bond, a remarkable
accomplishment when measured against any
standard. His reformer's zeal and dogged
persistence won him the opposition of certain
segments of Boston society as well as the
devotion and aid of many Boston philanthropists
and organizations. The first probation statute,
enacted in Massachusetts shortly after this death
in 1859, was widely attributed to his efforts.
Probation in the Philippines
• Probation was first introduced in the Philippines
during the American colonial period (1898 -
1945) with the enactment of Act No. 4221 of the
Philippine Legislature on 7 August 1935.
• This law created a Probation Office under the
Department of Justice. On November 16, 1937,
after barely two years of existence, the Supreme
Court of the Philippines declared the Probation
Law unconstitutional because of some defects in
the law's procedural framework.
Probation in the Philippines
• In 1972, House Bill No. 393 was filed in
Congress, which would establish a
probation system in the Philippines. This bill
avoided the objectionable features of Act
4221 that struck down the 1935 law as
unconstitutional. The bill was passed by the
House of Representatives, but was pending
in the Senate when Martial Law was
declared and Congress was abolished.
Probation in the Philippines
• In 1975, the National Police Commission
Interdisciplinary drafted a Probation Law. After 18
technical hearings over a period of six months, the
draft decree was presented to a selected group of
369 jurists, penologists, civic leaders and social and
behavioral scientists and practitioners. The group
overwhelmingly indorsed the establishment of an
Adult Probation System in the country.
• On 24 July 1976, Presidential Decree No. 968, also
known as Adult Probation Law of 1976, was signed
into Law by the President of the Philippines.
Probation in the Philippines
• The operationalization of the Probation System in
1976-1977 was a massive undertaking during which
all judges and prosecutors nationwide were trained
in probation methods and procedures;
administrative and procedural manuals were
developed; probation officers recruited and trained,
and the central agency and probation field offices
organized throughout the country. Fifteen selected
probation officers were sent to U.S.A. for orientation
and training in probation administration. Upon their
return, they were assigned to train the newly
recruited probation officers.
Probation in the Philippines
• The probation system started to
operate on January 3, 1978. As more
probation officers were recruited and
trained, more field offices were
opened. There are at present 204 field
offices spread all over the country,
supervised by 15 regional offices.
Purposes of the Probation Law
1. to promote the correction and
rehabilitation of an offender by
providing him with individualized
treatment;
2. to provide an opportunity for the
reformation of a penitent offender
which might be less probable if he were
to serve a prison sentence; and
3. to prevent the commission of offenses.
PD 968 or the Adult Probation Law
• Sec 1. Title: Known as the
Probation Law of 1976.
• Sec 2. Coverage: It shall apply to
all first-time offenders except
those entitled to the benefits
under the provisions of PD 603
and similar laws.
Important Terms (Sec 3)
• “Probation” Is a disposition under which a
defendant, after conviction and sentence, is
released subject to conditions imposed by the
court and to the supervision of a probation
officer.
• “Probationer” means a person placed on
probation.
• “Probation Officer ” Means one who
investigates for the court a referral for
probation or supervises a probationer or both.
(d) “Absconding Probationer” – a person
whose probation was granted but failed
to report for supervision within the
period ordered by the court or a
probationer who fails to continue
reporting for supervision and/ whose
where about are unknown for a
reasonable period of time.
Grant of Probation (Sec 4)
• The court may, after it shall have
convicted and sentenced a defendant
and upon application at any time of
said defendant, suspend the execution
of said sentence and place the
defendant on probation for such
period and upon such terms and
conditions as it may deem best.
Grant of Probation (Sec 4)
• Probation may be granted whether the
sentence imposes a term of imprisonment
or a fine only. An application for probation
shall be filed with the trial court, with notice
to the appellate court if an appeal has been
taken from the sentence of conviction. The
filing of the application shall be deemed a
waver of the right to appeal, or the
automatic withdrawal of a pending appeal.
Grant of Probation (Sec 4)
• An order granting or denying
probation shall not be
appealable.
Grant of Probation (Sec 4)
Application of Probation to be more specific:
• Application for probation shall be filled with the
trial court which has jurisdiction over the case.
• Time of filling shall be any time after conviction
and sentence but within the period for perfecting
as appeal (15 days) as provided by the Rules of
Court.
• The application shall be in the form approved by
the Secretary of Justice as recommended by the
Administrator.
Post-sentence Investigation (Sec 5)
• No person shall be placed on
probation except upon prior
investigation by the probation officer
and a determination by the court
that the ends of justice and the best
interest of the public as well as that
of the defendant will be served
thereby.
• Note: PSI is mandatory. It is a pre-requisite in
granting probation
Purpose of Post-Sentence Investigation
• To be able the trial court to determine
whether or not the applicant would be served
by the grant or denial of the application.
POST SENTENCE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
A. Preliminary Procedure – The probation
officer, upon receipt of the order from the court
shall assign the same to a probation officer to
conduct the post-sentence investigation
B. Initial Interview – Within five working days
from receipt of the court order, the probation
officer shall interview the petitioner to
accomplish under an oath a worksheet (P.A
Form No. 1) the information contained in the
worksheet shall serve as the basis for further
investigation.
• The petitioner shall sign a waiver (P.A Form
No. 2) authorizing the Probation
Administration to secure any and all pertinent
documents and information.
C. Investigation- Upon completion of
Worksheet. The probation Officer shall
conduct thorough investigation on the
antecedents, mental and physical
condition, character and socio-economic
status of the petitioner. The Probation
Officer shall determine and recommend
manner by which the petitioner will be
supervised if granted probation.
c.1 Collateral Information – In the gathering of
collateral information, person who have
knowledge of the petitioner of the victim and or
relatives shall be interviewed.
f. the risk to other persons, including the victim, his witnesses, his family
and friends, or the community in general, the possibility of retaliation
by the victim, his family and friends.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR
THE GRANT OF PAROLE AND
CONDITIONAL PARDON
a. youthful offenders;
B. Other Forms
1. Amnesty
2. Commutation of Service
3. Reprieve
Guidelines for the Grant of
Executive Clemency
• According to the BPP Revised
Manual (2006), and based on
newly amended rules, the
following are guideline for the
grant of executive clemency and
parole:
Sec 2: Consideration of Cases for
Executive Clemency
• The Board of Pardons and Parole
(BPP) may consider cases for
executive clemency upon
petition, or, referral by the Office
of the President.
Sec 3: Extraordinary
Circumstances
• The Board shall recommend to
the President the grant of
executive clemency when any of
the following extraordinary
circumstances are present:
1. The Trial Court or Appellate Court in
its decision recommended the grant of
Executive Clemency for the inmate;
2. Under the peculiar circumstances of
the case, the penalty imposed is too
harsh compared to the crime
committed;
3. Evidence which the court failed to
consider, before conviction which
would have justified an acquittal of
the accused;
4. Inmates who were over fifteen (15) but
under eighteen (18) years of age at the
time of the commission of the offense;
(repealed by RA 9344);
5. Inmates who were seventy (70) years
old and above and whose continued
imprisonment is inimical to their health
as recommended by a physician of the
Bureau of Corrections Hospital and
certified under oath by a physician
designated by DOH;
6. Inmates who suffer from serious contagious or
life-threatening illness disease, or with severe
physical disability such as those who are totally
blind, paralyzed, bedridden, etc., as
recommended by a Physician of the BuCor
Hospital and certified under oath by a
Physician designated by the DOH;
Sec 4: Other Circumstances
• When none of the extraordinary
circumstances enumerated in Sec 3 exist,
the Board may nonetheless review
and/or recommend to the President the
grant of executive clemency to an inmate
pursuant to the guidelines specified
under each executive clemency (pardon,
parole, amnesty, commutation of
sentence and reprieve).
Chapter V
PARDON
Pardon