Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

Prepared by: Leanne Herchelle M.

Lazaro
1.Scientific and Humanistic
2.Intrinsic and Pay-off
3.Formative and Summative
1.Scientific and Humanistic Approaches

Scientific Approach- is probably the oldest approach to


curriculum evaluation as it dates from modernism and the
emphasis on the scientific method of the 19th to 20th century.
This approach to curriculum evaluation focuses on using
quantitative data generate by the learners. This allows for
statistical analysis. Furthermore, the results are compared in
order to determine the level of success. This comparison is at the
heart of decision-making when this approach is employed.
1.Scientific and Humanistic Approaches

Humanistic Approach- looks at the individual rather than the


numbers. Data is much more qualitative in nature. The rationale
behind this is that life has multiple perspectives to it and
quantitative data only provides one perspective.
2. Intrinsic and Pay-off Approaches

Intrinsic Approach- is used to assess the overall quality of a


curriculum. This involves looking at the various components of
curriculum design such as the scope, sequence, articulation, balance
and other aspects. Aspects of curriculum development are also
assessed which means examining the teaching methods, content,
and learning experiences. However, initially, at least, the criteria of
evaluation is not determined but emerges after the process begins.
2. Intrinsic and Pay-off Approaches

Pay-off Approach- clear evaluation criteria are set from the


outset. Normally, evaluators look at the impact of the curriculum on
its stakeholders, which often includes, students, teachers, parents, and
administrators. This approach to evaluation is among the most
popular in education because of the clear criteria which makes data
collection smooth and efficient.
3. Formative and Summative Approaches

Formative Approach-aim to gain quick feedback about the


effectiveness of current instructional strategies with the explicit goal of
enhancing teaching during the target course. The focus of formative evaluation
is on soliciting feedback that enables timely revisions to enhance the learning
process. Formative evaluations are designed to provide information to help
instructors improve their online instruction. Formative evaluations may be
conducted at any time throughout the instructional process to monitor the
value and impact of instructional practices or to provide feedback on teaching
strengths and challenges.
3. Formative and Summative Approaches

Summative Approach- emphasize an overall judgement of one’s effectiveness in


teaching online. Conducted at the end of a course or program, the focus of summative evaluations is to
measure and document quality indicators for decision-making purposes. Although information gained from
summative evaluations may be used to improve future teaching performance, the information is not
provided in a timely fashion to provide opportunities for revision or modification of instructional strategies
while the teaching and learning is still in progress.
Summative evaluations are designed to measure instructor performance following a sustained period of
teaching with the focus on identifying the effectiveness of instruction. Summative evaluations provide a
means of accountability in gauging the extent to which an instructor meets the institution’s expectations for
online teaching. Because summative evaluations are a central component of gauging instructional
effectiveness at most institutions, the high-stakes nature mandates that these evaluations are valid and
reliable.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi