Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
THEIR EXPLANATION:
A spirit or soul, derived from the experience of human
souls or spirits in “dreams and waking hallucinations”
animates lifeless objects such as sticks or stones,
trees, mountains, rivers, etc.
SIR JAMES FRAZER
1854-1941
A Scottish ethnologist.
The Golden Bough (1890-1915):
compares the myths, magical practices,
and religions of the world’s cultures
throughout history.
Frazer developed the social evolutionary
model of:
MAGIC > RELIGION > SCIENCE
He asserted Australian Aborigines were
the most primitive of all because they
practiced only, what he defined their
spirituality as, magic.
EARLY 20TH CENTURY
ANTHROPOLOGY
CRITIQUES:
Descriptive and does not lend itself to theoretical formulations.
Applies to the local and not “bigger pictures” of culture.
CLIFFORD GEERTZ
(1926-2006)
Geertz focused on interpreting the
symbols that give meaning to
peoples’ lives.
He asserted that anthropologists
must deeply analyze and thickly
describe cultures and their symbols
through the interpretive model in
order to make difference
understandable.
He argued that religions are too
particularistic with regard to events,
individuals, and groups to be
understood through functionalist
theories.
GEERTZ ON RELIGION AS A
CULTURAL SYSTEM
Geertz’s definition of culture: "a historically transmitted pattern of meanings
embodied in symbols, a system of inherited conceptions expressed in symbolic forms
by means of which men (sic) communicate, perpetuate, and develop their knowledge
about and attitudes toward life.”
Geertz’s theory of religion as a cultural system:
A symbolic system, religion is a social construct that--through social interaction--
creates reality, and provides people with a blueprint for how to live.
Generates powerful and lasting moods and motivations in people. The moods are in
and of themselves, and the motivations are directed towards goals.
Infuses these moods and motivations with the sense that they are uniquely real.
Provides an overall ordering for existence that gives life meaning, and provides
explanations for why problems and tragedies occur.
Infuses the overall explanations and ordering for existence with the sense that it is
factual.
Together, these dynamics seem so powerful to believers that religion becomes the
only sensible explanation for reality. Belief is fortified through ritual, and then taken
into the world to transform it to conform with religion.
FEMINIST ANTHROPOLOGY
ANDROCENTRISM: The focus on the men of a community, and
the reliance on men’s opinions and explanations of the roles,
functions, and statuses of women in their community.
In the late 1960s, feminist anthropologists began focusing on
women’s experiences, and women’s roles, statuses, and contributions
to culture and their communities.
Feminist scholarship developed the concept and study of gender as
a culturally constructed analytical category.
Currently feminist anthropologists focus on comparative studies
amongst women.
Feminist approaches to religion and society:
Critiques of gendered relations of power
Investigations of pre-Abrahamic Goddess cultures and witchcraft
How women articulate their agencies with religious structural practices and
processes
STRUCTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Claude Levi-Strauss (he’s currently 100 years old) drew upon structural linguistics to
establish structural anthropology and asserted that people are hard wired to think about the
world in terms of binary opposites—raw and cooked, high and low, inside and outside,
person and animal, life and death, etc.
Binary structures are universal, every culture can be understood in terms of these opposites,
but their contents and meaning differ from culture to culture.
Individual objects and symbols are not important, it is the RELATIONSHIPS between them
that generate meaning.
Religion serves to mediate these oppositions, thereby resolving basic tensions or
contradictions found in cultures.
Culture and society shape people – a macro approach that gives primacy to structural
processes over the individual.
CRITIQUES:
Structural anthropology is synchronic, concentrating on specific cultural junctures not
contextualized with their histories.
It assumes binary thinking is hard wired, or essential to humans, but does not provide a
scientific framework to prove it.
Marxists: Structural anthropology fails to address economies and class struggles.
Feminists: Levi-Strauss focuses on the exchange of women in an uncritical way to support
his theory.
POST-STRUCTURAL
ANTHROPOLOGY
Post-structuralism emerged as a critique of structuralism, and the array of post-
structural theories are numerous and eclectic.
The post-structural moment occurred when it was recognized that people
participate in the creation of knowledge and power, and are not mere pawns of
cultural and social structural practices and processes.
Post-structuralism asserts that the study of underlying structures is itself a product
of culture, and therefore subject to biases and misinterpretations.
To understand culture, it is necessary to study the systems of knowledge which
produce culture.