Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NAME: AM
AGE: 66
GENDER: FEMALE
STATUS: MARRIED
ADDRESS:BACOLOD CITY
CHIEF COMPLAINT: EXERTIONAL DYSPNEA
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
2 weeks PTC – noted swelling of both feet, productive cough with greenish
sputum noted. Lipid profile, serum creatinine and chest xray was
requested.
On the day of consult noted brought in her X ray result which revealed
cardiomegaly. Exertional dyspnea lessened.
Past Medical History
GENERAL: (-) weight loss (-) loss of appetite (-) fever (-) night sweat
EYES, EAR, NOSE, MOUTH & THROAT: (-) blurring of vision (-) redness (-)
hearing loss (-) ear pain (-)nosebleed (-) sore throat (-) facial pain or
numbness
RESPIRATORY: (-)SOB (-)DOB (-)cough (-) cold
CARDIOVASCULAR: (-) palpitation (-) chest pain (-) orthopnea (-)
syncope
GASTROINTESTINAL: (-) constipation (-) loose watery stool (-)abdominal
pain
GENITO-URINARY: (-)FREQUENCY (-) URGENCY (-) DYSURIA (-) POLYURIA
MUSCULOSKELETAL: (-) JOINT PAINS (-) BACK PAIN (-) SWELLING (-)
DEFORMITY
INTEGUMENTARY: (-) RASHES (-) SKN LESION
PHYSICAL EXAM
NON SMOKER
NON ALCOHOLIC DRINKER
NO FOOD PREFERENCES
WORKS AS A NURSE
JOURNAL APPRAISAL
Cardiovascular outcomes and mortality
after initiation of canagliflozin: Analyses from
the EASEL Study
Jacob A. Udell, Zhong Yuan, Patrick Ryan, Toni Rush, Nicholas M. Sicignano, Michael
Galitz, Norman Rosenthal
Step 2.
Population: Newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabtes Mellitus patients
Intervention: canagliflozin
Comparison: non‐SGLT2 inhibitors
Outcome: all cause mortality and hospitalization with heart failure
Method: Retrospective New User Study
Clinical question:
Does the use of SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure in DM
Patients.
Step3.
1.a Was the assignment of patients
to treatment randomized?
No
1.b Were the groups similar at the
start of the trial?
Yes
4. Were all the participants who entered the
trial accounted for?
Yes
5. Were measures objective ?
Yes
Will The result help me in caring for
my patient?
Yes No
Is my Patient so different ✔
from those in the study
that the result cannot
apply
Is the treatment feasible ✔
in my setting?
Will the potential benefits ✔
of treatment outweigh
the potential harms of
treatment for my patient