MEDIATION ROMMEL O. MONDILLA JR. Four-fold duties of Lawyers
Lawyers must perform their four-fold duties to
society, the legal profession, the courts and their clients, in accordance with the values and norms of the legal profession. (Gala vs. Bala, 476 SCRA 85, 2005) Practice of law
The practice of law means any activity, in or
out of court, which requires the application of law or procedure. Generally, to practice law is to give advice or to render any kind of service which advice or service requires the use in any degree of legal knowledge or skill (Ulep vs Legal Clinic, Inc. B.M. No.553, June 17, 1993) Appearance in court or any tribunal, legal counselling or giving legal advice and drafting legal documents are examples of practice of law. Mediation a voluntary process in which a mediator, selected by the disputing parties, facilitates communication and negotiation, and assists the parties in reaching a voluntary agreement regarding a dispute (R.A 9285, “Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004”) mediation is non-evidentiary or non-merit based
mediation focuses on the facilitation of
communication and negotiation between the parties in order to encourage them to voluntarily settle their dispute COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION (CAM) Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM) CAM is a voluntary process conducted under the auspices of the court by referring the parties to the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) unit for the settlement of their dispute, assisted by a mediator accredited by the Supreme Court CAM is conducted prior to the pre-trial, where the judge refers the parties to the PMC for the mediation of their dispute by their trained and accredited mediators Excluded from the coverage of ADR Act of 2004 A.M. No. 01-10-5-SC-PHILJA Oct. 16, 2001 Designating the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA) as the Component Unit of the SC for Court-referred Court-Related Mediation Case and Other ADR Mechanisms and Establishing the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) Covered cases are mandatory to be referred to CAM during the pre-trial stage of court proceedings Coverage 1. All civil case, except those which by law may not be compromised (Art. 2035, N.C.C) 2. Special proceedings for the settlement of estates 3. The civil aspect of Quasi-Offenses under Title 14 of the RPC 4. The civil aspect of criminal cases where the imposable penalty does not exceed 6 yrs. Imprisonment and the offended party is a private person; and 5. The civil aspect of theft (not qualified theft), estafa (not syndicated or large scale estafa), and libel Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR)
JDR is a process whereby the judge (JDR
judge) employs conciliation, mediation or early neutral evaluation in order to settle a case at the pre-trial stage. In the event the JDR fails, then another judge (trial judge) shall proceed to hear and decide the case All cases which were not successfully settled in CAM shall be referred to JDR by judges in areas declared as JDR sites A.M No. 04-3-5-SC RE:Guidelines for Parties’ Counsel in CAM Cases Re-orientation of Attitudes towards Dispute- view the dispute as a problem-solving opportunity for lawyers to assists the parties resolve their differences in ways that are productive for their future lives Re-orientation of Lawyer’s role in Mediation- drop his combative role in adjudication and view his role as a collaborator with the other counsel Assistance in preparing a Compromise Agreement or Withdrawal of Complaint and Satisfaction of Claim-the lawyers shall assist the mediator in putting in writing the terms and see to it that they are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy Problem You are the judge in civil case for legal separation, with plea for support pendente lite. At the pre-trial, you are enjoined under rules prescribed by the Court Administrator, to try your best to reconcile or at least to find a compromise between the parties. You do that, inquiring into the family life of the parties, examining the source of their disagreement, and probing into their hidden fears and interests. From your inquiry, you get to know that it is probably the husband who is at fault, and that the wife needs immediate support, otherwise she and her four children will starve. Despite your best efforts, your attempts to settle fail, and the case goes to trial. Will you go and try the case yourself, or will you inhibit yourself and pass on the case to another judge? A.M No. 03-05-01-SC The New Code of Judicial Conduct for the Philippine Judiciary CANON 1 Independence- a pre requisite to the rule of law and fundamental guarantee of a fair trial. Sec. 1 Judges shall exercise the judicial function independently on the basis of their assessment of the facts and in accordance with a conscientious understanding of the law, free of any extraneous influence, inducement, pressure, threat or interference, direct or indirect, from any quarter or for any reason. CANON 3 Impartiality- Impartiality is essential to the proper discharge of the judicial itself also to the process by which decision is made Sec. 1. Judges shall perform their judicial duties without favor, bias or prejudice CANON 5 Equality- Ensuring equality of treatment to all before the courts is essential to the due performance of the judicial office
Sec. 2 Judges shall not, in the performance of
judicial duties, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice towards any person or group on irrelevant grounds Sec. 5, Canon 3 Judges shall disqualify themselves from participating in any proceedings in which they are unable to decide the matter impartially or in which it may appear to a reasonable observer that they are unable to decide the matter impartially. Such proceedings include, but are not limited to, instances where: a.The judge has actual bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceedings; b.The judge previously served as a lawyer or was a material witness in the matter in controversy; c. The judge, or a member of his or her family, has an economic interest in the outcome of the matter in controversy; d.The judge served as executor, administrator, guardian, trustee or lawyer in the case or matter in controversy, or a former associate of the judge served as counsel during their association, or the judge or lawyer was a material witness therein; e.The judge's ruling in a lower court is the subject of review; f.The judge is related by consanguinity or affinity to a party litigant within the sixth civil degree or to counsel within the fourth civil degree; or g.The judge knows that his or her spouse or child has a financial interest, as heir, legatee, creditor, fiduciary, or otherwise, in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings; ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN MEDIATION 1. You are assisting a client in a mediation proceeding. During the proceeding, the mediator makes a doctrinal statement about the rights of the parties which is erroneous but which is favorable to your client’s case. Will you correct the mediator and state the right doctrine, or will you just keep quiet? Why? CANON 17-A lawyer owes fidelity to the cause of his client and he shall be mindful of the trust and confidence reposed in him
Canon 17 provides that lawyers owe fidelity to
the cause of their client and must therefore be always mindful of the trust and confidence reposed in them. They are mandated to serve their client with competence and diligence. CANON 18-A lawyer shall serve his client with competence and diligence
Lawyers are mandated to serve their client
with competence and diligence. Specifically, they are not to “neglect a legal matter entrusted to them and their negligence in connection therewith shall render them liable” CPR requires every lawyer to serve his client with utmost dedication, competence and diligence. 2. You are counsel in a mediation proceeding, and the mediator assigned to the case by the Supervisor happens to be your friend. The other party and his counsel do not know this. If the mediator does not reveal this, will you volunteer the information, or just keep quiet? CANON 13- A lawyer shall rely upon the merits of his cause and refrain from any impropriety which tends to influence, or gives the appearance of influencing the court
A lawyer must not display or boast of being
influential to the court. This will erode the confidence of the public on the fair administration of justice Rule 13.01- A lawyer shall not extend extraordinary attention or hospitality to, nor seek opportunity for cultivating familiarity with Judges
A lawyer must rely on the merits of his case
and should avoid using influences and connection to win his case. His cases must be won because they are meritorious and not because of connections, clout, dominance or influence CANON 15-A Lawyer shall observe candor, fairness and loyalty in all his dealings and transactions with his clients.
As indispensable part of the system of
administering justice, attorneys must comply strictly with the oath of office and the canons of professional ethics. Lawyers should be fair, honest, respectable, above suspicion and beyond reproach in dealing with their clients. RULE 15.06- A lawyer shall not state or imply that he is able to influence any public official, tribunal or legislative body This rule prohibits influence-peddling It is any agreement entered into because of the actual or supposed influence to administrative or executive officers in the discharge of their duties which contemplates the use of personal influence and personal solicitation rather than any appeal to the judgement of the officer on the merits of the object sought 3. In preparing for a mediation proceeding, you learn that the mediator assigned to the case of your client is a married girl with whom you have had an extra-marital affair. Will you reveal this to disqualify her or not? Immoral conduct That conduct which is so wilful, flagrant, or shameless as to show indifference to the opinion of good and respectable members of the community. Furthermore, such conduct must not only be immoral, but grossly immoral.
constitute a criminal act or so unprincipled as
to be reprehensible to a high degree or committed under such scandalous or revolting circumstances as to shock the common sense of decency. RULE 1.01- A lawyer shall not engage in unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful conduct
As servants of the law and officers of the
court, lawyers are required to be at the forefront of observing the values and maintaining the rule of law. They are expected to make themselves exemplars worthy of emulation. CANON 7- A lawyer shall at all times uphold the integrity and dignity of the legal profession and support the activities of the integrated bar RULE 7.03-A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, nor shall he whether in public or private life, behave in a scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession. 4. In a civil case that was subjected to mediation but failed, the opposing party testifies in open court that he has been trying to settle with your client but he failed due to the intransigence/stubbornness of your client. In the mediation proceedings, however, it was the opposing party who backed out of a possible compromise after initially agreeing to it. Since mediation proceedings are confidential, will you bring out this fact to contradict him or not? Why or why not? Sec. 9 of R.A 9285 ADR ACT SEC. 9. Confidentiality of Information. - Information obtained through mediation proceedings shall be subject to the following principles and guidelines:
(a) Information obtained through mediation shall be privileged and
confidential.
(b) A party, a mediator, or a nonparty participant may refuse to
disclose and may prevent any other person from disclosing a mediation communication.
(c) Confidential Information shall not be subject to discovery and
shall be inadmissible if any adversarial proceeding, whether judicial or quasi-judicial, However, evidence or information that is otherwise admissible or subject to discovery does not become inadmissible or protected from discovery solely by reason of its use in a mediation. SEC. 10. Waiver of Confidentiality. - A privilege arising from the confidentiality of information may be waived in a record, or orally during a proceeding by the mediator and the mediation parties. SEC. 11. Exceptions to Privilege. - (a) There is no privilege against disclosure under Section 9 if mediation communication is: (1) in an agreement evidenced by a record authenticated by all parties to the agreement; (2) available to the public or that is made during a session of a mediation which is open, or is required by law to be open, to the public; CANON 19-A lawyer shall represent his client with zeal within the bounds of the law
Canon 19 reminds legal practitioners that a
lawyer’s duty is not to his client but to the administration of justice; to that end, his client’s success is wholly subordinate; and his conduct ought to and must always be scrupulously observant of law and ethics. 5. In a family dispute under mediation, you are assisting the defendant husband who has been accused of failing to support his wife and child. In the mediation proceedings, you witness the gross imbalance of power between the wealthy and articulate husband and he destitute and inarticulate wife. The proceedings have become an opportunity for the husband to browbeat/intimidate the wife and put her under intense psychological pressure. The wife cannot even afford to hire the services of counsel. As assisting counsel for the husband, what will you do, if you do at all? Why? CANON 1- A lawyer shall uphold the constitution, obey the laws of the land and promote respect for law of and legal processes
The first duty of lawyer is not to client but the
administration of justice. A member of the bar haw sworn an oath to uphold the laws of the land, more particularly our constitution and promote, at every opportunity, through word and deed, respect for our country’s laws and our courts. RULE 15.07- A lawyer shall empress upon his client compliance with the laws and the principles of fairness
A lawyer owes fidelity to the cause of his
client, but not at the expense of truth and the administration of justice and counsel for petitioner is reminded that it is his duty not to unduly delay a case, impede the execution of a judgment or misuse court processes.
This rule also obliges lawyers to impress upon
their clients compliance with the laws and Case Study “THE FATHER IN LAW” -The counsel of Harry -The mediator, Atty. Mariano -The counsel of Kathleen’s father
1. Identify the possible violations under
the Code of Professional Conduct (CPR) and why is it a violation? The counsel of Harry CANON 13- A lawyer shall rely upon the merits of his cause and refrain from any impropriety which tends to influence or gives the appearance of influencing the court The counsel of Kathleen’s father CANON 10- A lawyer owes candor, fairness and good faith to the court RULE 10.01- A lawyer shall not do any falsehood, nor consent to the doing of any in court; nor shall be mislead or allow the Court to be misled by any artifice CANON 19- A lawyer shall represent his client with zeal within the bounds of the Law CANON 12-A lawyer shall exert every effort and consider it his duty to assist in the speedy and efficient administration of justice
RULE 15.02- A lawyer shall be bound by the
rule on privilege communication in respect of matters disclosed to him by a prospective client The mediator, Atty. Mariano Code of Ethical Standards for Mediators under A.M No. 01-10-5-SC-PHILJA Canon 2: Responsibilities to parties Impartiality-the mediator shall maintain impartiality towards all parties. He shall withdraw from mediation if the mediator believes he can no longer be impartial. Conflict of Interest- the mediator shall refrain from participating in the mediation of any dispute if he/she perceives that participation as a Mediator will be a clear conflict of interest. -a mediator shall disclose any known, significant current or past personal relationship with any party or attorney involved in the mediation and the Mediator and parties should discuss on a case by case basis whether or not to continue -after the disclosure, and a party does not seek inhibition, the Mediator shall continue as